论文

Braess模型与城市网络的空间复杂化探讨

展开
  • 1. 北京大学地理科学研究中心, 北京100871;
    2. 东北师范大学城市与环境科学学院, 吉林长春130024

收稿日期: 2005-08-01

  修回日期: 2006-06-13

  网络出版日期: 2006-11-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(项目批准号:40371039)资助。

Braess's Paradox of Traffic Networks and Spatial Complication of Urban Systems

Expand
  • 1. Department of Geography, Peking University, Beijing, 100871;
    2. College of Urban and Environmental Science, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin 130024

Received date: 2005-08-01

  Revised date: 2006-06-13

  Online published: 2006-11-20

摘要

Braess交通网络模型是经典的图论模型,但该模型同时具有很强的地理学色彩。Braess借助一个简单的网络揭示了出人意料的地理现象:增加交通路线有时反而降低运输效率。从理论地理学的角度对Braess网络进行了数学抽象,然后利用规划理论、图论和微分方程解析等方法揭示出区域-城市地理系统的空间复杂化两个重要动因:空间相互作用和宏观对称破坏。

本文引用格式

陈彦光, 刘继生 . Braess模型与城市网络的空间复杂化探讨[J]. 地理科学, 2006 , 26(6) : 658 -663 . DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2006.06.658

Abstract

One of the important projects of spatial complexity science is spatial complication, which needs concrete and substaintial researches by means of effective methods. The paradox of traffic assignment problems is taken as an example to show how a system of cities and towns become complicate with the passage of time. Planning theory, graph theory, and differential dynamics, and so on, are employed to analyze the Braess’s paradox of traffic network, and new mathematical models are built in the process of geographical analyses based on the Braess’s network that is symmetric in macro-level. After new expressway is added in the network, two changes appear: one is macro-symmetry breaking of Braess’s network, and the other is spatial interaction between vehicle flows of different communication lines. Spatial interaction is associated with time lag and feedback what always give rise to non-linearity, while symmetry breaking implies spatial order breaking and reconstruction. A conclusion is drawn that spatial interaction and macro symmetry breaking are two dynamic factors activating spatial complication of self-organizing network of cities and towns.

参考文献

[1] Wilson A G.Complex Spatial Systems:The Modelling Foundations of Urban and Regional Analysis[M].Singapore:Pearson Education Asia Pte Ltd.,2000.
[2] Braess D.A paradox on traffic networks[R].2004.Available at:http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/
[3] Hagstrom J N,Abrams R A.Characterizing Braess's Paradox for Traffic Networks[M].Proceedings of IEEE,Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems,2001,837-842.
[4] Hagstrom J.Braess's Paradox[R].2004.Available at:http://tigger.uic.edu/
[5] Arthur W B.Why do things become more complex[J].Scientific American,1993,268:92.
[6] Arthur W B.Complexity and the economy[J].Science,1999,284(2):107-109.
[7] Holland J.Hidden Order:How Adaptation Builds Complexity[M].Reading,M A:Addison-Wesley,1995.
[8] White R,Engelen G.Cellular dynamics and GIS:modeling spatial complexity[J].Geographical Systems,1993,1:237-253.
[9] Batty M.The emergence of cities:complexity and urban dynamics[M].CASA UCL Papers,2003,available at:http://www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/working_papers/paper64.pdf
文章导航

/