综述

景观价值与景观保护评价

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 辽宁 沈阳 110016;
    2. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100049;
    3. 中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所, 甘肃 兰州 730000

收稿日期: 2005-03-16

  修回日期: 2006-06-22

  网络出版日期: 2006-07-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(40571161、90102004)资助。

Assessment on Landscape Value and Protection

Expand
  • 1. Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016;
    2. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049;
    3. State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000

Received date: 2005-03-16

  Revised date: 2006-06-22

  Online published: 2006-07-20

摘要

景观以其兼具经济、生态、文化等多重价值而为人类所重视,又由于人类活动日益强烈的干扰而面临景观破碎化和景观组分间连接性丧失的威胁,从而备受国内外学者的关注。文章从稀有性、多样性、功效性、宜人性、资源性以及美学价值等方面对景观价值的内涵进行了评述,并介绍了景观价值定量化研究的方法;从视觉感知的角度对景观保护的评定方法和不同景观评定的实例进行了综述,并结合中国的实际情况,列举了当前中国急需保护的各类景观,为中国自然保护事业提供参考依据。

本文引用格式

肖笃宁, 解伏菊, 魏建兵 . 景观价值与景观保护评价[J]. 地理科学, 2006 , 26(4) : 506 -512 . DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2006.04.506

Abstract

Landscape has multi-functions such as economy, ecology and culture, and it faces threats from landscape fragmentation and loss of connectivity among landscape components induced by more intensive anthropogenic disturbances, therefore, landscape attracted more and more attention all over the world. Firstly, this article reviewed the connotation of landscape value, including rarity that is an important landscape character, diversity expressing the structure and function diversity of landscape cell, efficacy that means the transformation function of substance, energy, information and value in a given ecosystem, livability implying a landscape being suitable for existence of human beings and aesthetic value defined from human behavior model and information process theory. Secondly, it introduced the quantitative methods of evaluating landscape value, including direct use value, indirect use value, optional value, hereditable value, and subsistent value. Corresponding assessment methods for above landscape value were summed up, they are cost analysis method, income analysis method, shadow price method, substitute cost method, estate value analysis method, respectively. In addition, the assessment methods and cases on various landscapes according to human visual sensing were also listed. In the view of authors, national natural heritage with rarity, unique and aesthetic characteristics, anthropogenic management landscape with important culture value, destructed landscape which need ecological restoration or rehabilitation due to engineering destruction or landscape contamination by irrational use, should be protected first and foremost. The scenic beauty of landscape obtained by testing the public taste, landscape vulnerability and landscape threshold value that is a token of resistance, assimilation and restoration ability to disturbance, and landscape susceptibility expressing the attention extent by public, were then summarized combining the physical circumstance in China, which might be helpful for natural conservation in China.

参考文献

[1] Antrop M.Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2000, 77:17-28.
[2] 肖笃宁,钟林生.景观分类与评价的生态原则[J]. 应用生态学报,1998,9(2):217~221.
[3] 马克明,傅伯杰,周华峰.景观多样性测度:格局多样性的亲和度分析[J].生态学报,1998,18(1):76~81.
[4] 陈利顶,傅伯杰.景观连接度的生态学意义及其应用[J].生态学杂志,1996,15(4):37~42.
[5] 傅伯杰,陈利顶.景观多样性的类型及其生态意义[J].地理学报,1996,51(5):455~462.
[6] 傅伯杰,陈利顶,马克明,等.景观生态学原理及应用[M].北京:科学出版社, 2001.92~93.
[7] Odum H T.Ecology and general systems [M]. Niwot: Univ Colorado Press 1994. Revision of Odum H T. Systems Ecology. New York:John Wiley & Sons 1983.
[8] 蓝盛芳,钦 佩.生态系统的能值分析[J]. 应用生态学报,2001,12(1):129~131.
[9] 马克明,孔红梅,关文彬,等.生态系统健康评价:方法与方向[J].生态学报,2001,21(12):2106~2116.
[10] 李 瑾,安树青,程小莉, 等.生态系统健康评价的研究进展[J].植物生态学报,2001, 25(6):641~647.
[11] 罗跃初,周忠轩,孙 秩, 等.流域生态系统健康评价方法[J].生态学报,2003,23(8):1606~1614.
[12] 彭 涛,高旺盛,隋 鹏.农田生态系统健康评价指标体系的探讨[J].中国农业大学学报,2004,9(1):21~25.
[13] 李春英,刘 才,陈 焱.现代生态学研究的热点问题之一:生态系统健康[J].东北林业大学学报,2003,31(4):54~55.
[14] 张 峰,周维芝,张 坤.湿地生态系统的服务功益及可持续利用[J].地理科学,2003,23(6): 674~679.
[15] 宗跃光.城市景观生态规划的理论与方法[M].北京:中国科学技术出版杜,1993.
[16] 李双成,郑 度.环境与生态系统资本价值评估的区域范本[J].地理科学,2002,22(3):270~275.
[17] 任志远.区域生态环境服务功能经济价值评价的理论与方法[J].经济地理,2003, 23 (1):1~4.
[18] 宗跃光.城市景观生态价值的边际效用分析法[J].城市环境与城市生态,1998,11(4):52~54.
[19] 庄大昌,丁登山,董明辉.洞庭湖湿地资源退化的生态经济损益评估[J].地理科学,2003,23(6):680~685.
[20] 陈昌笃.景观保护与受胁景观红皮书[J].生物多样性,1994,2(3):177~180.
[21] 涂书新,韦朝阳.我国生物修复技术的现状与展望[J]. 地理科学,2003,23(6):20~31.
[22] 尹德涛,南忠仁,金成洙.矿区生态研究的现状及发展趋势[J]. 地理科学,2004,24(4): 238~244.
[23] Buhyoff G J,Leuschner W A.Estimation psychological disutilityfrom damaged forest stands [J]. For. Sci., 1978, 24(1): 424-432.
[24] Kaplan R.The analysis of perception via preference: A strategy for studding how the environment is experienced [J]. Landscape Planning, 1985, 12(2):161-176.
[25] 张 慧,沈渭寿,江腊沙.青藏铁路沿线景观保护评价方法研究[J].生态学报,2004,24(3):574~582.
[26] 俞孔坚.自然风景质量评价研究——BIB-LCJ审美评判测量法[J]. 北京林业大学学报,1998,10(2):1~11.
[27] 吴必虎,李咪咪.小兴安岭风景道景观评价研究[J].地理学报,2001,56(2):214~222.
[28] 陈鑫峰,王 雁.森林美剖析——主论森林植物的形式美[J]. 林业科技, 2001,37(2):122~130.
[29] 王云才.乡村景观旅游规划设计理论与实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.61~65.
[30] 俞孔坚.景观敏感度及其阈值评价分析[J].地理研究,1991,10(2):38~51.
[31] 赵跃龙.中国脆弱生态环境类型分布及其综合整治[M].北京:中国环境出版社,1999. 99.
[32] 李团胜.石鉄矛.肖笃宁.大城市区域的景观生态规划理论与方法[J]. 地理学与国土研究, 1999, 15(2):52~55.
[33] 夏慧荣.高速公路环境景观评价的研究[J]. 环境保护科学,2001,27:42~43.
文章导航

/