论文

青藏公路路堤边坡产流产沙规律及影响因素分析

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院生态环境研究中心系统生态重点实验室, 北京 100085;
    2. 北京师范大学地理学与遥感科学学院, 北京 100875;
    3. 交通部科学研究院, 北京 100029

收稿日期: 2004-11-22

  修回日期: 2005-06-03

  网络出版日期: 2006-03-20

基金资助

西部交通建设科技项目(200231822107)。

Laws of Soil Erosion on Sideslopes of Qinghai-Tibet Highway

Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Systems Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environment Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085;
    2. School of Geography and Remote Sensing Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    3. China Academy of Transportation Science, Ministry of Communications, Beijing 100029

Received date: 2004-11-22

  Revised date: 2005-06-03

  Online published: 2006-03-20

摘要

公路建设引起的人为加速侵蚀对生态环境造成很大影响,为摸清道路边坡的侵蚀规律,在青藏公路边坡布设了自然径流观测小区,降雨过后进行采样,获得径流深和侵蚀模数数据。对所得数据整理分析表明:(1)次径流深、次侵蚀模数与降雨量和降雨强度的乘积有很好的线性相关,相关系数分别为0.802和0.554。次径流深与次侵蚀模数之间的相关系数达到0.771;(2)产流产沙随坡长增加有减少的趋势,但其规律还有待进一步研究;(3)随着时间的推移,产流产沙有所下降,小区坡面的干扰得到了恢复,因此,时间是公路边坡水土流失的重要影响因素;(4)公路边坡的年侵蚀模数,包括降雨侵蚀和冻融侵蚀,共计11991.41 t/km2,属于极强度侵蚀。

本文引用格式

徐宪立, 张科利, 庞玲, 孔亚平, 罗利芳 . 青藏公路路堤边坡产流产沙规律及影响因素分析[J]. 地理科学, 2006 , 26(2) : 211 -216 . DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2006.02.211

Abstract

There is extremely fragile ecosystem in the Tibetan Plateau in China because of its severely natural conditions. Once destroyed, it is very hard to get recovered. Especially it is main headwaters for famous rivers such as the Yangtze River, the Yellow River, etc. However, in recent years, China government has been conducting great road construction in the area. These road constructions would cause erosion more and more serious, and sediment from road would destroy aquatic ecology. Now it is necessary to find road erosion principles so as to take scientific and effective measures to reduce or control road erosion adverse effects on aquatic ecology, so we took two years to observe by setting up natural runoff plots on road sideslope (fill slope) of Qinghai-Tibet highway. When each rain was over, we sampled and attained runoff depth and soil loss. Siphonal Automated Record Rain Gauge recorded the rainfall process. After analyzing these data, we get the following results: (1) The product of rainfall and average rainfall intensity (PI) is well correlated to both runoff depth and sediment yield per rainfall event. In addition, the correlation coefficient between runoff depth and sediment yield per event also can get to 0.771. (2) Runoff depth and sediment yield decrease as slope length increases. (3) Runoff and sediment decrease over time, and the disturbance to plots got recovered during the past two years, so time is a very important factor to affect road erosion. (4) According to the existing datasets, soil losses of road sideslope is 119.91 t /(ha穉), including rainfall erosion and freezing and thawing erosion. The results of this study show us that the idea of USLE (Universal Soil Loss Equation) in America can be used for road erosion prediction after revised under specific conditions. Overall, this study explored the factors influencing road erosion and how they affect, so it is significant not only to make road erosion prediction model, but also to protect environment especially for watershed ecology.

参考文献

[1] Wischmeier W H, Johnson C B, Cross B V. A soil erodibility nomograph for farmland and construction sites[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1971, 26: 189-193.
[2] 郑粉莉, 高学田. 坡面土壤侵蚀过程研究进展[J]. 地理科学, 2003, 23(2): 230~235.
[3] 章文波, 谢 云, 刘宝元. 利用日雨量计算降雨侵蚀力的方法研究[J]. 地理科学, 2002, 22(6): 705~711.
[4] 罗利芳, 张科利, 李双才. 撂荒后黄土高原坡耕地土壤透水性和抗冲性的变化[J]. 地理科学, 2003, 23(6): 728~733.
[5] 彭文英, 张科利, 江忠善,等. 黄土高原坡耕地退耕还草的水沙变化特征[J]. 地理科学, 2002, 22(4): 397~402.
[6] Lane P N, Sheridan G J. Impact of an unsealed forest road stream crossing: water quality and sediment sources[J]. Hydrol process, 2002, 16: 2599-2612.
[7] Ziegler A D, Giambellucaand T W. Importance of rural roads as source areas for runoff in mountainous areas of northern Thailand[J]. Journal of hydrology, 1997, 196: 204-229.
[8] Arnaez J, Larrea V, Ortigosa L. Surface runoff and soil erosion on unpaved forest roads from rainfall simulation tests in northeastern Spain[J]. Catena, 2004, 57: 1-14.
[9] Ziegler A D, Giambelluca T W, Sutherland R A. Erosion prediction on unpaved mountain roads in northern Thainland: validation of dynamic erodibility modeling using Kineros2[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2001, 15: 337-358.
[10] Ziegler A D, Giambellucaand T W, Sutherland R A. Improved method for modeling sediment transport on unpaved roads using Kineros2 and dynamic erodibility[J].Hydrological Processes, 2002, 16: 3709-3089.
[11] 杨成永, 王美芝, 许兆义,等. 秦沈客运专线路堤边坡土壤侵蚀预报研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2001, 15(2):14~16.
[12] 李忠武, 蔡强国, 吴淑安,等. 内昆铁路施工期不同下垫面土壤侵蚀模拟研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2001, 15(2): 6~8.
[13] Le Bissionnais Y, Renaux B, Delouche H. Interactions between soil properties and moisture content in crust formation, runoff and interrill erosion from tilled loess soils [J]. Catena, 1995, 25: 33-46.
[14] Evett S R, G R Dutt. Effect of slope and rainfall intensity on erosion from sodium dispersed compacted earth micro catchments [J]. Soil Sci. Ameri. J, 1985, 49(11): 202-206.
[15] Meyer L D, Harmon W C. How Row-side slope and steepness affect sideslope erosion[J]. Transactions of ASAE, 1989, 32(2):639-644.
[16] 孔亚平, 张科利, 唐克丽. 坡长对侵蚀产沙过程影响的模拟研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2001, 15(2):17~24.
文章导航

/