论文

山东省城市人口-城区面积的异速生长特征探讨

展开
  • 1. 东北师范大学地理系, 吉林, 长春, 130024;
    2. 北京大学环境学院地理科学中心, 北京, 100871

收稿日期: 2004-04-22

  修回日期: 2004-08-13

  网络出版日期: 2005-03-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(40371039)的部分内容。

An Allometric Analysis of the Shandong Urban System Using Ideas from Fractals

Expand
  • 1. College of urban and Environmental Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin 130024;
    2. Department of Geography, Peking University, Beijing 100871

Received date: 2004-04-22

  Revised date: 2004-08-13

  Online published: 2005-03-20

摘要

基于不同的城市定义标准,对山东省城市体系的城市人口和城区面积进行分析,发现只有地级市明确地服从异速生长定律,而县级市的关系则不够明朗。研究表明,山东省城市人口-城区面积异速生长的标度因子均小于1,而且定义的城区越小则标度因子越大。由此可见,山东省城市体系的城区扩展速度整体上比较合理,不过在中小城市郊区地带的土地利用比大城市郊区地带要浪费一些。山东城市人口-城区面积异速生长关系的状态不是很好,这暗示城市体系的发展存在许多不协调的因素,借助数学模型变换揭示了其中结构退化的实质所在。文章指出,只有通过自组织方式在城市之间形成一种自下而上式竞争-合作关系,才能进一步完善城市体系的时空结构。

本文引用格式

刘继生, 陈彦光 . 山东省城市人口-城区面积的异速生长特征探讨[J]. 地理科学, 2005 , 25(2) : 135 -141 . DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2005.02.135

Abstract

In this paper, the relationship between urban population size and land area of urbanized area of Shandong Province, PRC, in 2000 by is analyzed means of the fifth Census data.Without an accepted definition of urbanized area in China, we define the urbanized area by means of variable thresholds and two lower limit values are adopted: one is about 500 person/km2, and the other is around 600 persons/km2, taking into consideration the scale invariance of urban form.The system of cities is divided into three cases: first, larger cities without the towns of counties;second, the towns based only on counties;third, whole cities including both larger and smaller ones.Four simple functions in common use are tested:① linear, A=a+bP;② exponential, A=aexp (bP);③ logarithmic, A= a+blnP, and ④ power, A=aPb.Where A represents the urbanized area, P denotes the population in the corresponding urbanized area, both a and b are parameters regarded as constants under given conditions.Among the four functions, the power, which is most widely used in the literature on fractal and self-organized criticality, fits best for both the data based on different thresholds without considering the counties.However, if the smaller cities based on counties are taken into account, the results make a difference and then the logarithmic one fits better than the power.This implies that only the larger cities in Shandong Province conform to the law of allometric growth.The cause that the smaller ones fail to obey the law can be explained demographically: the data are not based on cities strictly but on districts for administrative purposes.The scaling factor of allometric model,b, is computed such as b =0.711 and b=0.794 for different thresholds, negative allometry results implying that A increases at a slower rate than P.In addition, the data based on non-agricultural population and built-up area are also fitted into the power function, which gives the allometric coefficient as b =0.854 <1, a negative allometry result still.Although the statistical results of the allometric equations in some cases are not satisfactory, we can still draw a clear conclusion that the Shandong urban system is rational state where the urban area-population relationships are concerned.The suggestion is made that self-organizing theories can be employed to optimize the urban system in the studied area.Sometimes the allometric relationships retrogress from the power to the logarithmic one, just as it does in Shandong systems of cities.This phenomenon is interpreted theoretically in the light of mathematical transformation.As a matter of fact, if we suppose that the growth rate of urbanized area is restricted without reason, the allometric equation will inevitably change into the reverse-exponential relationships.

参考文献

[1] Lee Y.An allometric analysis of the US urban system:1960-1980[J].Environment & Planning A,1989,21(4):463-476.
[2] Naroll R S,yon Bertalanffy L.The principle of allometry in biology and the social sciences[J].Ekistics,1973,36(215):244-252.
[3] Lo CP,Welch R.Chinese urban population estimates[J].Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1977,67:246-253
[4] 李旭旦.现代地理学的几个问题[J].地理知识,1979,(9):1~5.
[5] White R,Engelen G,Uljee I.The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modeling of urban-land dynamics[J].Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design,1997,24:323-343.
[6] 陈彦光,刘继生.城市土地利用结构和形态的定量描述:从信息熵到分数维[J].地理研究,2001,20(2):146~152.
[7] Batty M,Longley PA.Fractal Cities:A Geometry of Form and Function[M].London:Academic Press,Harcourt Brace &Company,Publishers,1994.
[8] 陈彦光,许秋红.区域城市人口-面积异速生长关系的分形几何模型[J].信阳师范学院学报(自然科学版),1999,12(2):60~64.
[9] 刘继生,陈彦光.长春地区城镇体系时空关联的异速生长分析:1949~1988[J].人文地理,2000,15(3):6~12.
[10] 陈彦光,周一星.基于RS数据的城市系统异速生长分析和城镇化水平预测模型:基本理论与应用方法[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2001,37(6):819~826.
[11] 林鸿溢,李映雪.分形论——奇异性探索[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社,1992.
[12] Rigon R,Rodriguez-Itutbe I,Rinaldo A.Feasible optimality implies Hack's law[J].Water Resources Research,1998,34(11):3181-3189.
[13] 刘继生,陈彦光.城镇体系空间结构的分形维数及其测算方法[J].地理研究,1999,18(2):171~178.
[14] Benguigui L,Czamanski D,Marinov M,Portugali Y.When and where is a city fractal?[J].Environment and Planning:Planning and Design,2000,27:507-519.
[15] Rubenstein J M.An Introduction to Human Geography(Fourth Edition)[M].New York:Macmillan Publishing Company,1994.
[16] 周一星.城市地理学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1995.
[17] Portugali J.Self-Organization and the City[M].Berlin:Springer-Verlag,2000.
[18] 陈彦光,刘继生.城市系统的异速生长关系与位序-规模法则——对Steindl模型的修正与发展[J].地理科学,2001,21(4):412~416.
文章导航

/