根据野外观测资料,比较不同农耕地的产流产沙与草地,分析了退耕还草后减流减沙效应随降雨特征、坡度以及时间变化的特征。结果表明,退耕还草减流减沙主要是在大雨量时,尤其是减流效应,在小雨量降雨时很弱,甚至不减流。退耕还草减流减沙效应随坡度的增加而增大,且减沙效应增长速度大于减流效应,退耕还草应尽快退掉25°以上的坡耕地。退耕还草减流减沙在多雨和暴雨多年份以及在暴雨多的季节效应强,主要削减的是大暴雨、高含沙的地表径流。在任何情况下,退耕还草的减沙效应都明显大于减流效应。
The Loess Plateau is well known to the world for its intense soil erosion. Increasingly critical soil erosion is an important factor contributing to ecological environment degradation such as land degradation and high sediment concentration of river. Water and soil losses are considered resulting from the most important cause of mankind irrational land use, particularly vegetation degeneration and cultivating steep slope land, and the awareness of tillage erosion as a soil degradation process has become an increasingly important concern to conservation. A large body of literature indicates that returning the steep sloping field to forest and grass land, and adjusting measures to local conditions to restore vegetation is the important measure to control soil and water loss in the plateau in our country. The study of returning the cropland to forest and grass affecting on the regional soil and water resources has been the hot. Even though there were many researches on reduced runoff and sediment for forest and grass, but based on comparing forest and grass to naked land, and less clear is the efficiency of reduced runoff and sediment resulting from returning cropland to grass. So, runoff and sediment changes characteristics after returning farmland to forest and grass should be studied. According to the comparison of the runoff and sediment amount in grass and cropland in experiment plots, the efficiency of reduced runoff and sediment with rainfall, slope and time were studied. Runoff and sediment reduction after restoring forest and grass occur mainly in heavy rain, particularly reduced runoff efficiency, in light rain, is very weak or not. Based on data calculated and analyzed, the efficiency of reduced runoff and sediment are 0.44 and 0.84 as rainfall exceeding 50mm compared 0.31 and 0.7 when rainfall under 20mm. With slope gradient increasing the efficiency increase, increasing speed of reducing sediment efficiency is much more rapidly than reduction of runoff. In those larger storms years and rainy seasons the efficiency of runoff and sediment reduction is high. At any time, reducing sediment efficiency is more strong than reduction of runoff. Returning cropland to forest and grass has been identified as main measure for conserving soil and water. The study results show, returning cropland to forest and grass is necessary, and the sloping field with a slope of >25° should be retured to grassland and forest as soon as possible. And it is hoped that such analyses will help understand the effect on water and soil resources from returning cropland to forest and grass.
[1] 唐克丽,等. 杏子河流域坡耕地的水土流失及其防治[J].水土保持通报,1983,(5):43~48.
[2] 朱显谟. 抢救"土壤水库"实为黄土高原生态环境综合治理与可持续发展的关键-四论黄土高原国土整治28字方针[J]. 水土保持学报,2000,14(1):1~5.
[3] 李玉山. 黄土高原治理开发与黄河断流的关系[J].水土保持通报,1997,17(6):41~45.
[4] 刘万铨. 黄土高原水土保持在黄河流域水资源开发利用中的地位和作用[J]. 中国水土保持,1999,(11):28~31.
[5] 许炯心. 黄土高原生态环境建设的若干问题与研究需要[J]. 水土保持研究,2000,7(2):10~13.
[6] 焦居仁,乔殿新. 退耕还林(草)的成功实践与思考[J]. 中国水土保持,2000,(7):1~2.
[7] 梁一民,侯喜禄,等. 黄土丘陵区林草植被快速建造的理论与技术[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1999,5(3):1~5.
[8] 侯喜禄,曹清玉. 陕北黄土丘陵区植被减沙效益研究[J]. 水土保持通报,1990,10(2):33~40.
[9] 邹桂霞,刘素媛. 不同树种水土保持效益研究[J]. 山西水土保持科技,1999,(4):9~10.
[10] 张启民,张文婷. 晋西黄土丘陵沟壑区几种优良牧草水土保持效益的研究[J]. 山西水土保持科技,1998,(4):13~15.
[11] 徐学选,陈霁巍,等. 黄河中游水土保持措施对径流的影响[J]. 人民黄河,2000,22(7):36~37.
[12] 蒋定生,江忠善,等. 黄土高原丘陵区水土流失规律与水土保持措施优化配置研究[J]. 水土保持学报,1992,6(3):14~17.
[13] 中国科学院黄土高原综合科学考察队. 黄土高原地区土壤侵蚀区域特征及其治理途径[M]. 北京:中国科学技术出版社,1991.
[14] 扈祥来. 甘肃省黄土丘陵地带森林植被对水资源的影响[J]. 水科学进展,2000,11(2):199~202.
[15] 张科利,细山田健三.坡面浅蚀发生过程及其与坡度关系的模拟研究[J].地理科学,1998,18(6):561~566.
[16] 蒋定生,等. 黄土高原水土流失与治理模式[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社,1997.