对评价河流颗粒物重金属污染水平的4种方法进行了比较研究;提出了适用于Igeo法和SEF法评价我国河流颗粒物重金属污染水平的评价参比标准值;并应用这些方法对我国部分河流颗粒物重金属的污染水平进行了评价。
Assessment of particulate quality clearly reveals its prominent role in heavy metal cycling. For this reason, two new methods(RSP and PEF)are put forward. Combined with preceding literature, four methods are compared. Based on assessment results of main rivers of out country, the paper proves that most of rivers are not seriously contaminated by heavy metal due to their strong buffer capacity. The aim of this paper is to provide theoretical reference for further studies and to provide appropriate selection for particulate quality assessment under different situations.
[1] Forstner U.Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences(Contaminated Sediments).Berlin:Springer Verlag,1989.107-109.
[2] 陈静生.水环境化学.北京:高等教育出版社,1987.186-187.
[3] Chapman D.Water Quantity Assessment.London:Chapman&Hall Ltd,1992,121-134.
[4] 吴瑜端.台湾海峡西岸主要港湾的重金属及其生态效应.见:陈静生,周家义.中国水环境重金属研究.北京:中国环科学出版社,1992.329-368.
[5] 陈静生,等.铜在沉积物各相中分配的实验模拟与数值模拟研究以鄱阳湖为例.环境科学学报,1987,7(2):140-149.