黄柏山树轮生长对气候因子的响应及模拟
作者简介:彭剑峰(1965-),男,河南南阳人,副教授,博士,主要从事树轮气候学和生态学。E-mail:jianfengpeng@163.com
收稿日期: 2014-01-28
要求修回日期: 2014-03-10
网络出版日期: 2015-05-20
基金资助
国家自然基金项目(31270493)、河南省教育厅自然科学基金项目(2011B170003)、河南大学校内科研基金重点项目(2010ZRZD06)、河南大学资源与环境研究所项目(HD-2HS-2010-02)资助
Response and Model of Tree-rings Growth to Climate Factors at Huangbaishan Mountain in Henan Province
Received date: 2014-01-28
Request revised date: 2014-03-10
Online published: 2015-05-20
Copyright
彭剑峰 , 王婷 . 黄柏山树轮生长对气候因子的响应及模拟[J]. 地理科学, 2015 , 35(5) : 644 -651 . DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2015.05.644
We developed three tree-ring width standard chronology from three Huangshan pine (Pinus taiwanensis) tree-ring sampling sites at Huangbaish Mountain in the western Dabieshan Mountain, Xinyang City of Henan Province. 1) 3 standard chronologies were developed by using the international general method of tree rings, the results of their chronology eigenvalues and statistical characteristics from common times indicated that higher environmental information was contained in Huangshan Pine tree-rings, nevertheless the first-order autocorrelation coefficient showed that there was the larger influence from the prior period of the tree-ring growth; 2) The results of correlation analysis (CA) and principal component analysis (PCA) showed that they closely related among 3 standard chronologies, but the result of PCA indicated that PC1 standing for the dominant factor was the climate environment factor and significant difference found from north to south, and PC2 and PC3 showed high altitude and sunny slope were conducive to the growth of Huangshan Pine; 3) Based on dendroclimatological analyses the relationships between tree-ring width indexes of whole research region and 3 sampling sites and climatic factors were detected there were some common impact factors to Huangshan Pine from different growth environment, but much more difference than that of in common; 4) By using multiple linear regression method, the regional tree-ring growth patterns were established about different influence factors, the stepwise linear regression results also identified that the dominant factor of affect trees growth in the whole study area was prior October temperature, and precipitation of previous August also plays a very important role in tree growth process. The results verify these of dendroclimatological research. The models of different elements have good consistency; tree growth difference is remarkable under extreme weather conditions.
Key words: tree-ring; climatic response; Dabieshan Mountain; Huangshan pine
Table 1 Survey of sampling sites and statistical characteristics of the standard tree-ring width chronologies from Huangbaishan Mountain表1 采样点基本概况及树木年轮标准年表的统计特征 |
特征 | XLH | DXG | JFJ |
---|---|---|---|
经度E | 115°19′ | 115°20′ | 115°23′ |
纬度N | 31°24′ | 31°27′ | 31°28′ |
海拔高度(m) | 840~760 | 760 | 988~1010 |
坡向 | 北 | 南 | 西北 |
总样本量(芯/树) | 56/36 | 36/18 | 30/22 |
年表研制样本量(芯/树) | 48/32 | 35/18 | 20/13 |
年表时段(年) | 1915~2011 | 1971~2011 | 1964~2011 |
平均敏感度 | 0.321 | 0.301 | 0.300 |
标准方差 | 1.490 | 1.497 | 1.621 |
一阶自相关系数 | 0.752 | 0.629 | 0.749 |
公共区间年份(年) | 1980~2010 | 1980~2010 | 1980~2010 |
所有样芯间相关R1 | 0.352 | 0.359 | 0.319 |
树木内相关R2 | 0.711 | 0.66 | 0.490 |
树木间相关R3 | 0.347 | 0.35 | 0.314 |
信噪比 | 23.408 | 15.675 | 8.445 |
样本解释总量 | 0.959 | 0.94 | 0.894 |
Fig.1 Location of tree-ring sampling sites and the closest meteorological stations图1 树轮采样点和相邻气象站 |
Fig.2 The three standard tree-ring width chronologies and sampling numbers of Huangshan Pine图2 3个黄山松采样点的树木年轮宽度标准年表(STD)及样本量 |
Fig.3 Monthly mean air temperature, monthly maximum air temperature, monthly minimum air temperature and monthly precipitation in Macheng meteorological station of Hubei in 1959-2011图3 麻城气象站月均气温T、月均高温Tmax、月均低温Tmin和月降水量P年内分配(1959~2011年) |
Table 2 Principal components analyses and eigenvectors from the three standard tree-ring width chronologies表2 3个树木年轮宽度年表的主成份分析及特征向量 |
主成分 | 特征值 | 贡献率 (%) | 累计贡 献率(%) | 特征向量 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLH | DXG | JFJ | ||||
PC1 | 1.8018 | 60.061 | 60.061 | 0.662 | 0.595 | 0.455 |
PC2 | 0.8363 | 27.875 | 87.936 | -0.114 | -0.520 | 0.846 |
PC3 | 0.3619 | 12.064 | 100.000 | -0.740 | 0.613 | 0.277 |
Fig. 4 Correlation coefficients between PC1 of three tree-ring width chronologies from Huangshan pine and climatic factorsin Macheng meteorological station图4 黄山松树木年轮宽度年表的第一主分量与气象要素的相关分析 |
Table 3 Correlation coefficients between 3 tree-ring width chronologies from Huangshan pine and temperature and precipitation in Macheng meteorological station in 1959-2011表3 3个树木年轮宽度年表与麻城气温和降水量的相关(1959~2011年) |
月份(月) | 与温度相关值 | 与降水量相关值 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLH | DXG | JFJ | XLH | DXG | JFJ | |
P5 | -0.06894 | 0.079744 | -0.06088 | -0.13581 | -0.05823 | 0.013258 |
P6 | -0.04089 | 0.082503 | -0.3056 | 0.041586 | 0.124772 | 0.153983 |
P7 | 0.05613 | -0.06159 | 0.063085 | -0.04646 | -0.09729 | -0.12785 |
P8 | -0.06807 | 0.065462 | -0.03477 | -0.07654 | -0.2831* | -0.3176* |
P9 | -0.3631* | -0.19378 | -0.13668 | 0.2399* | 0.120174 | 0.128625 |
P10 | -0.3608* | -0.3585* | -0.3251* | 0.092586 | 0.098415 | 0.111472 |
P11 | 0.058046 | 0.058608 | 0.01189 | 0.27408* | 0.162458 | 0.139355 |
P12 | -0.14388 | -0.3858* | -0.03946 | -0.19128 | 0.113802 | -0.07796 |
1 | 0.080919 | 0.081338 | 0.34538* | -0.04043 | 0.035577 | 0.060779 |
2 | -0.08487 | 0.050625 | 0.138534 | 0.101723 | 0.28678* | 0.035205 |
3 | -0.12117 | 0.065947 | 0.073991 | -0.03278 | -0.00411 | 0.064563 |
4 | -0.17821 | -0.00239 | 0.063247 | 0.191886 | 0.33474* | 0.130483 |
5 | -0.20664 | -0.12835 | -0.23097 | 0.038256 | 0.225227 | 0.166927 |
6 | -0.1113 | -0.09012 | -0.07484 | -0.02813 | 0.05666 | 0.097177 |
7 | -0.18601 | -0.3136* | 0.02855 | 0.08565 | 0.290969 | -0.12507 |
8 | -0.2301 | -0.11475 | -0.01927 | -0.0073 | 0.068461 | -0.31927 |
9 | -0.21781 | -0.21706 | 0.107959 | 0.211145 | -0.11889 | -0.11285 |
10 | -0.15242 | -0.05205 | -0.15432 | 0.206638 | 0.075616 | 0.03977 |
注:P5~P12指前年5~12月;1~12为当年1~12月;*为置信水平在95%以上。 |
Fig.5 The PC1 curve (I) of three tree-ring width chronologies from Huangshan pine and different fitted curves (I1,I2,I3)图5 黄山松树木年轮宽度年表第一主分量(I)及不同拟合曲线(I1、I2、I3) |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |