doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2002.02.129

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 经济学家廖士(August L sch)十分重视空间和区位的关系,他在德国传统的区位理论基础上从事经济与空间配置的研究,提出了经济景观学说。廖士曾希望他的研究能够形成一个新的领域——空间经济学,并能引起经济学自身的重构。但实际上,经济景观学说对经济学并没有多少影响。相反,在19世纪50~60年代,他的名著《区域经济学》却对经济地理学发展和区域科学孕育产生了巨大贡献。最近几年来,由于经济全球化的趋势,西方经济学家又开始对地理学产生兴趣,新经济地理学或地理经济学应运而生。主要就其研究内容和发展动向进行综述介绍,并在此基础上对西方经济学与地理学融合的新趋向进行了讨论。

Abstract: August L sch, a famous economist, attached much importance to the relationship of space and location. Based on the traditional location theory from German, he engaged in the research of the matching of economy and space, and then established the theory of economic landscape. He had hoped that his own research would form a new field-space economy and brought the reconstruction to the economy itself. But in fact, the theory of economic landscape had not much effect on the economy. On the contrary, his famous book, The Economics of Location, did tremendous contribution to the development of economic geography and the gestation of region science between the 1850s and the 1860s. With the trend of economic globalization, the western economists have been interested in geography again in recent years, of which the leaders are Krugman, Porter, Arthur, etc. So "the new economic geography" or "the geographical economics" emerged. The paper introduces in detail the two major themes of "the new economic geography": the spatial agglomeration of economic activity and the dynamics of regional growth convergence, then points out the deficiences in "the new economic geography". In the end the paper emphasized that geography and economics should construct their new alliance based on the same goal and philosophical foundation.

中图分类号:

F119.9

顾朝林, 石爱华, 王恩儒. "新经济地理学"与"地理经济学"——兼论西方经济学与地理学融合的新趋向[J]. 地理科学, 2002, 22(2): 129-135.

GU Chao-lin, SHI Ai-hua, WANG En-ru. "New Economic Geography" or "Geographical Economics" ——A New Allied Trend of Geography and Economics[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2002, 22(2): 129-135.

参考文献

[1] Krugman P. Geography and Trade[M].Cambridge. MA, MIT Press, 1991.
[2] Krugman P. Devellpment, Geography and Economic Theory[M]. Cambridge: MA, MIT Press, 1995.
[3] Krugman p. The Self-Organizing Economy[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996A.
[4] Krugman P. What's new about the New Economic Geography[J]. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1998, 14(2):7-17.
[5] Porter M. The Competitive Advantage of Nations[M]. London: Macmillian, 1990.
[6] Porter M. Competitive Advantage, Agglomeration Economies and Regional Policy[J]. International Regional Science Review, 1996, 19(1-2):85-90.
[7] Martin R. The New "Geographical Turn" in Economics: Some Critical Reflections[J]. Cambridge Uournal of Economics, 1999, 23:65-91.
[8] David P. Krugman's Economic Geography of Development: NEGs, POGs, and Naked Models in Space[J]. International Regional Science Review, 1999, 22(2):162-172.
[9] Dymski G A. On Krugman's Model of Economic Geography[J]. Geoforum, 1996, 27(4):439-452.
[10] Ottaviano, G.and Puga, D.1998. Agglomeration in the global economy: a survey of the 'new economic geography'[J]. the World Economy, 1979, 21:707-732.
[11] Schmuztler A. The New Economic Geography[J]. Journal of Economic Surveys, 1999, 13(4):355-379.
[12] Arthur W B. Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy[M]. Michigan: Michigan University Press, 1994A.
[13] Arthur W B. Increasing returns and the new world of business[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1996, July-August, 100-9.
[14] Venables A. Localization of industry and trade performance, Oxford Economic Policy Review[J]. 1996B, 12(3):52-60.
[15] Martin R, P Sunley. Paul Krugman's Geographical Economics and Its Implications for Regional Development Theory: A Critical Assessment Economic Ge0graphy[J]. 1996, 72(3):259-292.
[16] Krugman P. Increasing Returns and Economic Geography[J]. Journal of Political Geography 1991b, 99:183-199.
[17] Puga D, Venables A J. Agglomeration and Economic Development: Import Substitution versus Trade Liberalization. Center for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, mimeo, 1997b.
[18] Bertola G. Models of economic integration and localized growth. 1993. pp.159-92 in Torres, F.and Giavassi, F.(eds.), Adjustment and Growth in European Monetary Union, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
[19] Martin P, Ottaviano G I P. Growth and agglomeration. Discussion Paper 1529, London: Centre for Economic Policy Research, 1996B.
[20] Baldwin R E. Agglomerration and Endogenous Capital. Graduate Institute of International Studies, University of Geneva, mimeo, 1997.
[21] Von Hagen J, Hammond G. Industrial localization: an empirical test for Marshallian localization economies. London: Center for Economic Policy Research, 1994, Discussion Paper 917.
[22] Antonelli C. Technology districts, localized spillovers and productivity growth: the italian evidence on technological externalities in core regions. International Review of Applied Economics, 1994, 18-30.
[23] Audretsch D, and Feldman P. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production[J]. American Economic Review, 1996, 86(3): 630-40.
[24] Barro R, Sala-I-Martin X. Economic Growth[M]. New York: McGraw Hill, 1995.
[25] Cashin P. Economic growth and convergence across the seven colonies of Australia[J]. 1861-1991, Economic Record, 1995, 1(71): 128-40.
[26] Cheshire P, Carbonaro G. Convergence and divergence in regional growth rates: an empty black box. 1995. in Armstrong H, Vickerman R.(eds.), Convergence and Divergence Among European Regions, London, Pion,89-111.
[27] Coulombe S, Lee F C. 'Regional Economic Disparities in Canada'. Department of Economics, University of Ottawa, mimeo, 1993.
[28] Shioji E. 'Regional Growth in Japan'. Department of Economics, Yale University, mimeo,1993.
[29] Krugman P. The Current Case for Industrial Policy[M]. In Protectionism and World Welfare, ed. D. Salvatore, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993a, 160-179.
[30] Krugman P, A Venables, Integration, Specialization and Adjustment[J]. European Economic Review 1996, 40:959-967.
[31] Williamson J. Regional Inequalities and the Process of National Development[J]. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1965, 13:1-84.
[32] Scott A. Interregional Subcontracting Patterns in the Aerospace Industry: the Southern California Nexus[J]. Economic Gegography 1993, 69:142-156.
[33] Florida R. Regional creative destruction: production organization, globalization and the economic transformation of the Mid West[J]. Economic Geography, 1996, 72:314-34.
[34] Gerlter M. Flexibility Revisited: Districts, Nation States, and the Forces of Production. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 1992, 17:259-278.
[35] Scott A J, Storper M. Regional development reconsidered. 1992. pp.3-24 in Ernste, H.and Meier, V.(eds.), Regional Development and Contemporary Industrial Response: Extending Flexible Specialization, London, Belhaven.
[36] Harvey D. The Limits to Capital[M]. Oxford: Blachwell, 1982.
[37] Massey D. In what sense a regional problem[J]. Regional Studies. 1979 (13): 233-43.
[38] Smith N. Uneven Development[M]. Oxford, Blackwell, 1984.
[39] Clark G L. Unions and Communities Under Seige: American Communities and the Crisis of Organized Labour[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
[40] Hanson S, Pratt G. Gender, Work and Space[M]. London: Routledge,1995.
[41] Markusen A, Hall P, Glasmeier A. High Tech America: The What, How, Where and Why of the Sunrise Industries[M]. London: Allen and Unwin, 1986.
[42] Storper M, Walker R. The Capitalist Imperative: Territory, Technology and Industrial Growth[M]. Oxford, Blackwell, 1989.
[43] Kaldor N. Inter-regional trade and cumulative causation. pp.57-79in Kaldor N, Economics Without Equilibrium, New York, Shape, 1985.
[44] Isserman A M. The history, status and future of regional science: an American Perspective[J]. International Regional Science Review, 1995, 17(3): 249-296.

"新经济地理学"与"地理经济学"——兼论西方经济学与地理学融合的新趋向

"New Economic Geography" or "Geographical Economics" ——A New Allied Trend of Geography and Economics

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	王宁宁, 陈锐, 赵宇, 钟少颖. 中国区域信息空间和人口空间的耦合关联分析[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 36(10): 1474-1484.
[2]	郑蕾, 刘毅, 刘卫东. 全球整车及其零部件贸易格局演化特征[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(5): 662-670.
[3]	黄润, 王升堂, 倪建华, 孙贤斌, 王笑梅. 皖西大别山五大水库生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(10): 1270-1274.
[4]	张红霞, 王学真. 山东省地区经济差距的地带与产业来源分解[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(8): 955-962.
[5]	王芳, 高晓路. 内蒙古县域经济空间格局演化研究[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(7): 818-824.
[6]	韩增林, 杜鹏, 王利, 于洋, 赵东霞, 丛迎雪, 任启龙. 区域公共服务设施优化配置方法研究——以大连市甘井子区兴华街道小学配置为例[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(7): 803-809.
[7]	王岩, 方创琳. 大庆市城市脆弱性综合评价与动态演变研究[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(5): 547-555.
[8]	范强, 杨俊, 吴楠, 马占东. 海岸旅游小镇景观格局演变与动态模拟——以大连市金石滩国家旅游度假区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(12): 1467-1475.
[9]	宋伟轩, 陈雯, 彭颖. 长三角区域一体化背景下城乡收入格局演变研究[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(9): 1037-1042.
[10]	鲁莎莎, 刘彦随, 关兴良. 中国城乡转型背景下农业综合区划研究——以106国道沿线典型样带区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(8): 909-917.
[11]	周涛, 刘继生. 吉林省农产品加工产业集群布局和发展模式研究[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(7): 815-823.
[12]	孟斌, 湛东升, 郝丽荣. 基于社会属性的北京市居民通勤满意度空间差异分析[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(4): 410-417.
[13]	王庆喜, 徐维祥, 朱恒福. 外商群集投资的区位决定因素：基于验证性因子分析的研究[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(12): 1439-1443.
[14]	徐辉, 刘俊. 广东省区域技术创新能力测度的灰色关联分析[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(9): 1075-1080.
[15]	关兴良, 方创琳, 罗奎. 基于空间场能的中国区域经济发展差异评价[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(9): 1055-1065.