地理科学

地理科学 ›› 2006, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 118-127.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2006.01.118

• 问题讨论 • 上一篇    

番禺是华南海上丝路最早的始发港—对《关于中国古代“海上丝绸之路”最早始发港研究述评》的意见

赵焕庭1,2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院边缘海地质重点实验室 广东 广州 510301;
    2. 中国科学院南海海洋研究所 广东 广州 510301
  • 收稿日期:2005-06-10 修回日期:2005-10-25 出版日期:2006-01-20 发布日期:2006-01-20

Panyu: The Earliest Set Sail Port of the Maritime Silk Route of South China —Some Views on A Review on Researches in Earliest Departure Harbor of Silk Road on Sea in Ancient China

ZHAO Huan-ting1,2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Marginal Sea Geology, CAS, Guangdong Guangzhou 510301;
    2. South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, CAS, Guangdong Guagnzhou 510301
  • Received:2005-06-10 Revised:2005-10-25 Online:2006-01-20 Published:2006-01-20

PDF (PC)

赞

摘要： 韩湖初等评述中国古代海上丝路最早始发港问题的文章有几点不足:①论题虚大,拟谈中国,却只谈华南;②说人们已得出比较一致的意见,认为北部湾合浦、徐闻和日南3海港是华南古代海上丝路最早的始发港,否定番禺说。这并不符合实际,因为有些番禺说的论文未被列为参考文献予以分析;③否认番禺说与赞同北部湾说的根据是不能令人信服的。笔者根据历史文献、考古成果与历史地理条件,逐一分析韩文的理据,得出番禺是华南古代海上丝路最早始发港的结论。

Abstract: The paper by HAN Hu-Chu et al.commented the earliest set sail portof the maritime silk route of ancient China has some insufficiencies: ①this title is exaggerated. It is intended to discuss on China, but only discuss upon South China.② it is said that the people had a rather unanimous view, that is, three harbors of Hepu, Xuwen and Rinan in Beibuwan Bay were the earliest set sail ports of the maritime silk route of ancient South China, which is against Panyu theory. This is inconsistent with the facts, because some papers of the Panyu theory had not been listed as references and analyzed. ③ The arguments for Beibuwan Bay theory or against Panyu theory are not convincing. Based on the historical literature, archaeological achievement and historical geographical condition, this paper is analyzed these arguments one by one, as well as getting a conclusion—Panyu was the earliest set sail port of the maritime silk route of ancient South China.

中图分类号: 

  • K901.9