辽中地区矿业城市生态系统脆弱性研究

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2008.06.759

地理科学 ›› 2008, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 759-764.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2008.06.759

辽中地区矿业城市生态系统脆弱性研究

顾康康^1,2, 刘景双¹, 王洋¹, 彭小黎³, 王明全^1,2

1. 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所, 吉林长春, 130012;
2. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京, 100049;
3. 安徽省农业科学院情报研究所, 安徽合肥 230031

收稿日期:2007-10-14 修回日期:2008-03-16 出版日期:2008-11-20 发布日期:2008-11-20
通讯作者: 刘景双,研究员。E-mail:Liujingshuang@neigae.ac.cn E-mail:刘景双, Liujingshuang@neigae.ac.cn
作者简介:顾康康(1982- ),男,安徽蚌埠人,博士生,主要从事生态承载力与区域生态安全调控研究。Email:gukangkang@neigae.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划973计划项目(2004CB418507)资助。

Ecological Vulnerability of Mining Cities in Central Liaoning

GU Kang-kang^1,2, LIU Jing-shuang¹, WANG Yang¹, PENG Xiao-li³, WANG Ming-quan^1,2

1. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, Jilin 130012;
2. Graduate university of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049;
3. Intelligence Research Institution, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Science, Hefei, Anhui 230034

Received:2007-10-14 Revised:2008-03-16 Online:2008-11-20 Published:2008-11-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 辽中地区矿业城市是中国重要的能源生产和重工业基地,研究其生态系统脆弱性有助于改善该区域环境恶化、生态系统失调的状况,为其可持续发展提供决策依据。基于矿业城市复合生态系统内涵,建立了辽中地区矿业脆弱性评价指标体系,提出生态系统协调度,并设定了其脆弱性和协调性分级标准。结果表明:2005年,辽中地区矿业城市生态系统脆弱性处于亚稳定状态,主要限制因子为资源匹配指数、环境质量指数和经济发展指数;辽中地区矿业城市生态系统间处于亚协调状态,其中本溪略低于亚协调,处于低度失调状态。鞍山的资源匹配指数处于较失调状态,抚顺、本溪的资源匹配指数处于失调状态,抚顺、本溪的经济发展指数处于较失调状态,是限制整个生态系统协调发展的主要原因。该评价模型较真实的反映了辽中地区矿业城市生态系统脆弱性、协调性状况,并且提出了制约其发展主要限制因子。

Abstract: Since the mining cities in Central Liaoning have been important energy production base and heavy industry base in China, the research on their ecological vulnerability will contribute to the improvement of environmental quality and ecological harmony, then we would offer academic basis for the decision-making of sustainable development. Based on the meaning of compound ecosystem in mining cities, we established the indicator system about ecological vulnerability of mining cities in Central Liaoning; put forward the ecological harmony degree; and set up the standards of ecological vulnerability and ecological harmony degree. The results showed that: the ecological vulnerability of mining cities in central Liaoning was in the sub-steady state, the main restrict factors were resources matching index, environmental quality index and economic development index. The ecosystem of it was in the sub-harmony state, of which Benxi was inferior to sub-harmony. The resources matching index in Anshan was inferior to maladjusted, Fushun and Benxi, the economic development index in Fushun and Benxi were inferior to maladjusted, which were the main restrict factors on the harmony development of ecosystems. The vulnerability and harmony degree for the ecosystems of the mining cities in Central Liaoning were well reflected by the model, then we offered their main restrict factors.

中图分类号:

X826

顾康康, 刘景双, 王洋, 彭小黎, 王明全. 辽中地区矿业城市生态系统脆弱性研究[J]. 地理科学, 2008, 28(6): 759-764.

GU Kang-kang, LIU Jing-shuang, WANG Yang, PENG Xiao-li, WANG Ming-quan. Ecological Vulnerability of Mining Cities in Central Liaoning[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2008, 28(6): 759-764.

参考文献

[1] 史培军, 王静爱, 陈婧, 等. 当代地理学之人地相互作用研究的趋向——全球变化人类行为计划(IHDP)第六届开放会议透视[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(2):115~126.
[2] A. Malheiro. Geological hazards in the Azores archipelago: Volcanic terrain instability and human vulnerability [J]. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 2006, 156: 158-171.
[3] WEI Yi-ming, FAN Ying, CONG Lu, et al. The assessment of vulnerability to natural disasters in China by using the DEA method [J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2004, 24: 427-439.
[4] Irasema A A. Geomorphology, natural hazards, vulnerability and prevention of natural disasters in developing countries [J]. Geomorphology, 2002, 47: 107-124.
[5] Simas T, Nunes J.P, Ferreira L.G. Effect of global climate change on coastal salt marshes [J]. Ecological modeling, 2001, 139: 1-15.
[6] 於琍, 曹明奎, 李克让. 全球气候变化背景下生态系统的脆弱性评价[J]. 地理科学进展, 2005, 24(1): 61~69.
[7] A Haines, R.S Kovats, D Campbell-Lendrum, et al. Climate change and human health: impacts, vulnerability, and mitigation [J]. Harben Lecture, 2006, 367: 2101-2109.
[8] H.M Fussel. Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research [J]. Global Environmental Change, in press.
[9] M.J Metzger, M.D.A Rounsevell, L Acosta-Michlink, et al. The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change [J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2006, (114):69-85.
[10] 黄方, 刘湘南, 张养贞. GIS支持下的吉林西部生态环境脆弱态势评价研究[J]. 地理科学, 2003, 23(1):95~100.
[11] 裘善文, 张柏, 王志春. 吉林省西部土地荒漠化现状、特征与治理途径研究[J]. 地理科学, 2003, 23(2): 188~192.
[12] SHI Pei-jun, DU Juan, JI Meng-xin, et al. Urban risk assessment research of major natural disasters in China [J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2006, 21(2):170-177.
[13] 许世远, 王军, 石纯, 等. 沿海城市自然灾害风险研究[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(2):127~138.
[14] T Aven. A unified framework for risk and vulnerability analysis covering both safety and security [J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2007, (92):745-754.
[15] B Smit, J Wandel. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability [J]. Global Environmental Change, 2006, (16): 282-292.
[16] 王志强, 杨春燕, 王静爱, 等. 基于农户尺度的农业旱灾成灾风险评价与可持续发展[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2005, 14(6): 94~99.
[17] 樊杰, 孙威, 傅小锋. 我国矿业城市持续发展的问题、成因与策略[J]. 自然资源学报, 2005, 20(1): 68~77.
[18] 沈镭. 新亚欧大陆桥沿线矿业城市发展与矿业扶贫初探. 宁夏大学学报(自然科学版), 1997, 20(2): 90~102.
[19] 徐建华. 现代地理学中数学方法[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2002.
[20] 乔家君. 改进的层次分析法在河南省可持续发展能力评估中的应用[J]. 河南大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 33(2): 58~62.
[21] 徐建华, 卢艳, 岳文泽, 等. 区域可持续发展水平综合评价排序计算模型研究—以三西地区为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2002, 25(1): 44~49.
[22] 张凤玲, 刘静玲, 杨志峰. 城市河湖生态系统健康评价——以北京市"六海"为例[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(11): 3019~3027.
[23] 杨世琦, 高旺盛, 隋鹏, 等. 湖南资阳区生态经济社会系统协调度评价研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2005, 15(5): 67~70.

辽中地区矿业城市生态系统脆弱性研究

Ecological Vulnerability of Mining Cities in Central Liaoning

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	谢余初, 巩杰, 张素欣, 马学成, 胡宝清. 基于遥感和InVEST模型的白龙江流域景观生物多样性时空格局研究[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(6): 979-986.
[2]	陈平, 田竹君, 李曌, 刘朋. 日本国家尺度生物多样性综合评价概况及启示[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(9): 1130-1139.
[3]	谢余初, 巩杰, 张玲玲. 基于PSR模型的白龙江流域景观生态安全时空变化[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(6): 790-797.
[4]	周彬, 钟林生, 陈田, 张爱平. 浙江省旅游生态安全的时空格局及障碍因子[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(5): 599-607.
[5]	王耕, 王嘉丽, 龚丽妍, 苏柏灵, 刘秋波. 基于GIS-Markov区域生态安全时空演变研究——以大连市甘井子区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(8): 957-964.
[6]	吕建树, 吴泉源, 张祖陆, 刘洋. 基于RS和GIS的济宁市土地利用变化及生态安全研究[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(8): 928-935.
[7]	薛亮, 任志远. 基于格网GIS的关中地区生态安全研究[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(1): 123-128.
[8]	赵跃龙, 张玲娟. 脆弱生态环境定量评价方法的研究[J]. 地理科学, 1998, 18(1): 73-79.