汛期洪水弃水与水土流失耦合风险关系分析

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2011.09.1138

地理科学 ›› 2011, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (9): 1138-1143.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2011.09.1138

汛期洪水弃水与水土流失耦合风险关系分析

李勋贵^1,2, 魏霞^1,3

1. 兰州大学资源环境学院, 甘肃兰州 730000;
2. 兰州大学干旱区水循环与水资源研究中心, 甘肃兰州 730000;
3. 中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所, 甘肃兰州 730000

收稿日期:2010-11-09 修回日期:2011-02-06 出版日期:1997-09-20 发布日期:1997-09-20
基金资助:
高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目(20090211120021)、兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(lzujbky-2010-103)、国家自然科学基金项目(51109103、41001154)资助。

Relationship Between Surplus Floodwater in Flood Season and Coupling Risk of Soil and Water Loss

LI Xun-Gui^1,2, WEI Xia^1,3

1. College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China;
2. Center for Hydrologic Cycle and Water Resources in Arid Region, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China;
3. Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China

Received:2010-11-09 Revised:2011-02-06 Online:1997-09-20 Published:1997-09-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 暴雨洪水是导致流域水土流失的一个重要因素,水土流失又会引起径流泥沙含量的增加,使汛期洪水弃水量加大,成为汛期洪水灾害发生的重要原因。以泾河流域为例,根据信息熵理论和USLE模型,提出约束信息量因子BI和水土流失耦合风险概念及其计算式,建立汛期洪水弃水系数与水土流失耦合风险等级之间的关系式,结果表明:①泾河张家山站以上流域1986、1995和2000年的水土流失耦合风险等级呈现出递减的趋势,分别为2.544、2.542和2.472;②汛期洪水弃水系数与水土流失耦合风险等级之间存在着显著正相关关系。

Abstract: Rainstorm flood is one important factor resulting in soil and water loss of watershed. The soil and water loss can cause the increase of sediment concentration in runoff, which will add more surplus flood in flood season and consequently become an important reason for the occurrence of flood disaster. A factor of binding information (BI) was presented based on the information entropy theory. The BI is able to describe the uncertainty degree (i.e., risk value) hiding in system before events happen. According to the BI values of different controllable-observable objectives (COOs), the changing situations of uncertainty degree that events evolve from a COO to another one can be uncovered. So the BI is convenient to test risk changing of soil and water loss and reflect its evolution trend. In addition, the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) has a preferable merit to describe and maintain the details of soil and water loss. Considering these characteristics of the USLE and BI, a notion of risk, coupling risk of soil and water loss, was proposed. The coupling risk is defined as the superposition results multiplied the BI by the factors in USLE. It can not only maintain the details of soil and water loss, but also describe the evolution processes of soil and water loss risk. On the basis of the presented coupling risk, a function relationship between sediment concentration in runoff and coupling risk grade of soil and water loss is established. A maximum rating method is employed to calculate the coefficient of surplus floodwater in flood season based on the independent variable of sediment concentration in runoff. Therefore, the relation between the coefficient of surplus floodwater and the coupling risk grade of soil and water loss is achieved with the intermediate variable of sediment concentration in runoff. A case study related to Jinghe River Basin with representative characteristics of floodwater resources utilization and soil and water loss has been performed. Results demonstrate that: 1) the coupling risk grades of soil and water loss for 1986, 1995 and 2000 at the upper watershed of the controlled section of Zhangjiashan Station are 2.5437, 2.5421 and 2.4722, respectively, which shows a total decrease trend of the coupling risk of soil and water loss in the basin; 2) there is a prominent relationship at the confidence level of 0.01 between sediment concentration in runoff (y) and coupling risk grade of soil and water loss (x) as y=0.0108exp(2.4211x). The square of correlation coefficient R is equal to 0.4037 (R²= 0.4037). The higher the coupling risk grade (x) is, the larger the sediment concentration in runoff (y) is, vice versa; and 3) a prominent function relationship at 0.01 confidence level exists between the coefficient of surplus floodwater in flood season (y) and the coupling risk grade of soil and water loss (x) as y =0.0229exp(0.9937x)R²=0.3878. The bigger the coupling risk (x) is, the larger the coefficient of surplus floodwater (y) is, the larger the amount of surplus floodwater in flood season is, and the greater the flood disaster risk is. The results can provide a reference for analysis on relationship between the risks of watershed soil and water loss and flood disaster.

中图分类号:

P333.2/S157

李勋贵, 魏霞. 汛期洪水弃水与水土流失耦合风险关系分析[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(9): 1138-1143.

LI Xun-Gui, WEI Xia. Relationship Between Surplus Floodwater in Flood Season and Coupling Risk of Soil and Water Loss[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2011, 31(9): 1138-1143.

参考文献

[1] 魏一鸣,杨存键,金菊良.洪水灾害分析与评估的综合集成方法[J].水科学进展,1999,10(1):25~30.
[2] Yang S Q,Chen Y N,Wang A S.Dynamic mechanism of flood disaster on the basis of chaotic theory[J].Journal of the Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,2003,20(4):446-451.
[3] Lincoln T.Flood of data[J].Nature,2007,447(7143):393.
[4] 付湘,王丽萍,边玮.洪水风险管理与保险[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
[5] 张欧阳,许炯心,张红武,等.洪水的灾害与资源效应及其转化模式[J].自然灾害学报,2003,12(1):25~30.
[6] 向立云,魏智敏.洪水资源化——概念、途径与策略[J].水利发展研究,2005,(7):24~29.
[7] 王浩,殷峻暹.洪水资源利用风险管理研究综述[J].水利发展研究,2004,(5):4~8.
[8] 施雅风,沈永平,胡汝骥.西北气候由暖干向暖湿转型的信号、影响和前景初步探讨[J].冰川冻土,2002,24(3):219~226.
[9] 程国栋,王根绪.中国西北地区的干旱与旱灾——变化趋势与对策[J].地学前缘,2006,13(1):3~14.
[10] 国家防办课题调研组.洪水资源化调研报告[J].中国防汛抗旱,2004,(2):10~14.
[11] Cheng C T,Chau K W.Flood control management system for reservoirs[J].Environmental Modelling and Software,2004,19(12):1141-1150.
[12] Roughani M,Ghafouri M,Tabatabaei M.An innovative methodology for the prioritization of sub-catchments for flood control[J].International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation,2007,9(1):79-87.
[13] 陈颙,史培军.自然灾害(修订版)[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2008.
[14] Wu Q,Wang M Y.A framework for risk assessment on soil erosion by water using an integrated and systematic approach[J].Journal of Hydrology,2007,337(1-2):11-21.
[15] Wischmeier W H,Smith D D.Rainfall energy and its relationship to soil loss[J].Transactions of the American Geophysical Union,1958,39(2):285-291.
[16] Wischmeier W H,Smith D D.Predicting rainfall erosion losses from cropland east of the Rocky Mountains.Agricultural Handbook No.282,Agricultural Research Service,US Department of Agriculture,Purdue Agricultural Experiment Station,1965.
[17] Wischmeier W H,Smith D D.Predicting rainfall erosion losses-a guide to conservation planning with the universal soil loss equation (USLE).Agriculture Handbook No.537,US Department of Agriculture,Springfield,USA,1978.
[18] Renschler C S,Mannaerts C,Diekkrüger B.Evaluating spatial and temporal variability in soil erosion risk—rainfall erosivity and soil loss ratios in Andalusia,Spain[J].Catena,1999, 34(3-4):209–225.
[19] Gobin A,Jones R,Kirkby M,et al.Indicators for pan-European assessment and monitoring of soil erosion by water[J].Environmental Science & Policy,2004,7(1):25-38.
[20] Li S,Lobb D A,Lindstrom M J,et al.Tillage and water erosion on different landscapes in the northern North American Great Plains evaluated using 137Cs technique and soil erosion models[J].Catena,2007,70(3):493-505.
[21] Volk M,Mller M,Wurbs D.A pragmatic approach for soil erosion risk assessment within policy hierarchies[J].Land Use Policy,2010,27(4):997-1009.
[22] Amore E,Modica C,Nearing M,et al.Scale effect in USLE and WEPP application for soil erosion computation from three Sicilian basins[J].Journal of Hydrology,2004,293(1-4):100-114.
[23] 李勋贵,王乃昂,魏霞.高含沙河流汛期弃水量确定的分级最大值法[J].资源科学,2010,32(6):1213~1219.
[24] 李志,刘文兆,郑粉莉.1965~2005年泾河流域极端温度事件变化特征[J].地理科学,2010,30(3):469~474.
[25] 刘晓清,赵景波,于学峰.清代泾河中游地区洪涝灾害研究[J].地理科学, 2007,27(3): 445~448.
[26] 查小春,黄春长,庞奖励,等.泾河流域不同时间尺度洪水序列频率分析对比研究[J].地理科学,2009,29(6): 858~863.
[27] 冉大川,郭宝群,张晓华,等.泾河流域来沙系数变化与响应分析[J].泥沙研究,2009,(2):60~67.
[28] 王春,汤国安,张婷,等.黄土模拟小流域降雨侵蚀中地面坡度的空间变异[J].地理科学,2005,25(6): 683~689.
[29] 许炯心.人类活动和降水变化对嘉陵江流域侵蚀产沙的影响[J].地理科学,2006,26(4):432~437.
[30] 张利华,李辉,张艳艳.基于137Cs示踪法的丹江口小流域农用地土壤侵蚀研究[J].地理科学,2009,29(2): 273~277.
[31] Renard K G,Freimund J R.Using monthly precipitation data to estimate the R-factor in the revised USLE[J].Journal of Hydrology,1994,157(1-4):287-306.
[32] Fistikoglu O,Harmancioglu N B.Integration of GIS with USLE in assessment of soil erosion[J].Water Resources Management,2002,16(6):447-467.
[33] 黄强,李勋贵, Feng L,等.系统周界的观控模型及其应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(3):101~106.
[34] 李勋贵,黄强,Feng L,等.界壳的泛系观控模型及其在水资源中的应用[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2005,41(5):14~19.
[35] 毕晓丽.泾河流域生态系统主要问题分析及其退耕还林(草)时空规划.北京:北京师范大学,2005.
[36] 汤国安,刘学军,闾国年.数字高程模型及地学分析的原理与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2005.
[37] 汪邦稳,杨勤科,刘志红,等.基于DEM和GIS的修正通用土壤流失方程地形因子值的提取[J].中国水土保持科学,2007,5(2):18~23.
[38] 蔡崇法,丁树文,史志华,等.应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(2): 19~24.
[39] 朱连奇,许叔明,陈沛云.山区土地利用/覆被变化对土壤侵蚀的影响[J].地理研究,2003,22(4):432~438.
[40] 冉大川.泾河流域水沙特性及减水减沙效益分析[J].水土保持通报,1992,12(5):20~28.
[41] 韦中兴,蔺生睿.泾河流域水文特性分析[J].水文,1996,(2):52~59.

汛期洪水弃水与水土流失耦合风险关系分析

Relationship Between Surplus Floodwater in Flood Season and Coupling Risk of Soil and Water Loss

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0