基于不同时空尺度的知识溢出网络结构特征研究

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2013.010.1180

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

知识溢出的多空间尺度耦合、空间知识溢出的测度以及空间知识溢出的机制是近期国内外有关知识溢出地理效应研究的主要新动向。借助科学计量学追踪知识溢出的方法,以2000~2009年被国际ISI及国内重庆维普数据库收录的,中国大学和科研院所等机构在生物技术领域合作发表科学论文的信息为数据源,从社会网络的视角,运用社会网络分析和GIS空间分析方法,分别以国家、省份和城市为单元,从国际、国家和长三角层面（区域）,分析2000年以来,中国大学和科研院所知识溢出网络的拓扑结构和空间结构变动特征,并从地理距离、社会距离、认知距离、组织距离等方面探讨影响知识溢出效应的机理。研究发现：① 2003~2004年为知识溢出网络发展的拐点期;② 国际和国家层面网络接近小世界网络,长三角层面的网络体现出更多的随机网络特征;③ 知识在国际层面的空间溢出具有明显的路径依赖性,主要受到社会距离和组织距离的影响;④ 在国家层面呈现由三角形向钻石形发展的趋势,随着网络发育的日益成熟,地理距离的影响逐步减弱,社会距离和组织距离的影响得以加强;⑤ 在长三角层面总体上呈现三点一线特征,地理距离在区域尺度的影响最为显著,知识溢出既遵循了等级扩散的规律,也体现了距离衰减的特点。

关键词: 知识溢出, 社会网络, 科学计量学, 创新政策

Abstract:

In recent years, there are some trends in the research field of geographical effect of knowledge spillovers, such as coupling of knowledge spillovers between various space scales, measuring the space track of knowledge spillovers, and exploration the mechanism of spatial knowledge spillovers. By using the metrology of tracking knowledge spillovers from Scientometrics, this article takes statistical data of the scientific papers published in cooperation about the biotechnology both in the database of Thompson R ISI Web of Knowledge (ISI) and Chinese Scientific and Technical Journals (Journal of Chongqiing VIP) from 2000 to 2009 as data source. From the perspective of social network, using countries, provinces and cities as nodes, the knowledge spillover networks is constructed respectively at international, national and regional (the Yangtze Delta) levels. By using the Social Network Analysis (SNA) and the GIS spatial analysis method, this article analysis the topological and spatial structure characteristics of the knowledge spillover networks since 2000, and study the Influence factors of knowledge spillover effects from the perspective of geographic distance, cognitive distance, social distance and organization distance. The results show that: 1）The period of 2003-2004 is the turning period of the development of knowledge spillover network; 2） The networks are more like small-world networks at international and national level, but at the Yangtze Delta level, the characteristics of networks are closed to random network; 3）The spatial spillovers of knowledge are path dependence at international level, and mainly affected by the social distance and organizational distance; 4）At the national level, the spatial distribution of network present the trend from triangle form to diamond form. With the maturity of network, the influences of geographical distance gradually diminishing, on the contrary, the influences of social distance and organizational distance gradually strengthen; 5）At the regional level of the Yangtze Delta, the spatial distribution of network appears three point and one line features, and geographical distance plays a significant impact at the regional scale, which means knowledge spillovers not only follow the law of hierarchical diffusion, but also reflect the characteristics of distance decay.

Key words: knowledge spillover, social network, scientometrics, innovation policy

中图分类号:

F224

李丹丹, 汪涛, 周辉. 基于不同时空尺度的知识溢出网络结构特征研究[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(10): 1180-1187.

Dan-dan LI, Tao WANG, Hui ZHOU. The Structural Characteristics of Knowledge Spillover Networks Based on Different Spatial and Temporal Scales[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2013, 33(10): 1180-1187.

图/表 5

表1

图1

图2

图3

表2

参考文献 31

[1]	Breschi S,Lissoni F.Localised knowledge spillovers vs. innovative milieux:knowledge 'tacitness' reconsidered[J].Papers in Regional Science,2001,80(3):255-273.
[2]	Boschma R A,Iammarino S.Related variety,trade linkages and regional growth[J].Economic Geography,2009,85:289-311.
[3]	Barde S.Knowledge spillovers,black holes and the equilibrium location of vertically linked industries[J].Journal of Economic Geography,2010,11(3):27-53.
[4]	Lucas R E.On the mechanics of economic development[J].Journal of Monetary Economics,1988,12:3-42.
[5]	Duranton G.Urban evolution:the fast,the slow,and the still[J].American Economic Review,2007,97:197-221.
[6]	滕丽,蔡砥,吕拉昌.经济一体化背景下的区域溢出分析[J].人文地理,2010,22(2):116~119.
[7]	滕丽,蔡砥,王铮.区域知识溢出的计算分析[J].地理科学,2008,28(4):478~482.
[8]	Rosenthal S S,Strange W C.Geography,industrial organization,and agglomeration[J].The Revies of Economics and Statistics,2003,85(2):377-393.
[9]	Parent O,Lesage J P.Using the variance structure of the conditional autoregressive spatial specification to model knowledge spillovers[J].Journal of Applied Econometrics,2008,23:235-256.
[10]	Faria P D,Sofda W.Knowledge protection strategies of multinational firms―A cross-country comparison[J].Research Policy,2010,38(7):956-968.
[11]	Audretsch D B,Feldman M P.Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation[C]//Henderson J V,Thisse J F.Handbook of regional and urban economics.Amsterdam:Elsevier,2004.
[12]	McKelvey M,Alm H,Riccaboni M.Does co-location matter for formal knowledge collaboration in the Swedish biotechnology-pharmaceutical sector?[J].Research Policy,2003,32(3):483-501.
[13]	Fisher M,Scherngell T,Jansenberger E.The geography of knowledge spillovers between high-technology firms in Europe[J].Geographical Analysis,2006,38(3):288-309.
[14]	Ponds R,van Oort F G,Frenken K.The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration[J].Papers in Regional Science,2001,86(3):423-443.
[15]	Bathelt H,Malmberg A,Maskell P.Clusters and knowledge:local buzz,global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation[J].Progress in Human Geograpphy,2004,28(1):31-56.
[16]	Glueckler J.Economic geography and the evolution of networks[J].Journal of Economic Geography, 2007,7(5): 619-634.
[17]	盛垒. 西方空间知识溢出研究进展探析与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2010,32(10):2~9.
[18]	马艳艳. 面向企业的大学知识溢出机制与效应研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2011.
[19]	Ter Wal A, Boschma R.Applying social network analysis in economic geography:framing some key analytic issues[J].The Annals of Regional Science,2009,43:739-756.
[20]	Liefner I,Hennemann S.Structural holes and new dimensions of distance:the spatial configuration of the scientific knowledge network of China′s optical technology sector[J].Environment and Planning A,2011,43(4):810-829.
[21]	Hennemann S,Wang T,Liefner I.Measuring regional science networks in China:a comparison of international and domestic bibliographic data sources[J].Scientometrics,2011,88(2):535-554.
[22]	Graf H.Inventor networks in emerging key technologies:information technology vs. semiconductors[J].Journal of Evolutionary Economics,2012,22:459-480.
[23]	Feldman M P.Location and innovation:the new economic geography of innovation,spillovers,and agglomeration[C]//Clark G,Feldman M P,Gertler M.Oxford handbook of economic geography.Oxford:Oxford University Press,2000.
[24]	陈傲,柳卸林,程鹏.空间知识溢出影响因素的作用机制[J].科学学研究,2011,29(6):883~889.
[25]	Eriksson R H.Localized spillovers and knowledge flows:how does proximity influence the performance of plants?[J]Economic Geography,2011,87(2):127-152.
[26]	Wang Y,Wu Y S,Pan Y T,Ma Z,Rousseau R.Scientific collaboration in China as reflected in co-authorship[J].Scientometrics,2005,62(2):183-198.
[27]	陈旭,陶小马,谭婧.城市背景下的知识溢出研究述评[J].城市规划学刊,2011,(5):48~54.
[28]	Ratchford J T,Blanpied W A.Paths to the future for science and technology in China,India and the United States[J].Technology in Society,2008,30:211-233.
[29]	Zhang F Z,Cooke P,Wu F L.State-sponsored research and development:a case study of China′s biotechnology[J].Regional Studies,2011,45(5):575-595.
[30]	Ernst D.A new geography of knowledge in the electronics industry?Asia′s role in global innovation network[R].Honululu:East-West Center,2009.
[31]	Krackhardt D.QAP partialling as a test for spuriousness[J].Social Networks,1987,9(2):171-186.

年份（年）	国际层面（N1）					国家层面（N2）					长三角区域层面（N3）
年份（年）	S	D	P	C_D(%)	C_B(%)	S	D	P	C_D(%)	C_B(%)	S	D	P	C_D(%)	C_B(%)
2000	17	0.79	1.83	17.11	92.84	25	0.27	2.62	12.23	31.66	5	1.00	1.00	20.83	0.00
2001	19	1.26	1.84	14.98	90.7	25	0.58	2.12	20.87	26.79	5	1.60	2.00	29.17	41.7
2002	21	1.62	1.84	12.25	90.03	27	0.91	1.85	27.98	35.87	6	2.13	2.13	28.33	34.00
2003	17	2.53	1.82	14.80	90.23	32	1.03	1.92	25.04	34.03	11	1.09	1.09	21.90	44.9
2004	21	2.24	1.86	12.71	91.42	32	1.55	1.86	22.85	26.3	12	1.18	1.18	17.05	29.4
2005	22	3.16	1.79	10.73	67.77	32	2.34	1.72	27.31	12.66	14	1.08	2.10	19.23	37.9
2006	27	3.00	1.83	7.51	72.12	32	3.33	1.60	22.72	6.01	12	1.58	1.85	19.17	52.2
2007	28	3.90	1.82	7.20	69.21	33	4.42	1.54	20.17	9.52	11	2.65	1.75	20.19	52.00
2008	31	4.09	1.82	6.63	65.90	33	5.25	1.51	22.86	7.53	15	1.56	1.91	13.87	21.9
2009	33	4.52	1.80	6.75	59.85	32	5.79	1.43	20.16	9.68	14	2.18	1.91	13.04	32.4

三级层面	年份（年）	社会距离	地理距离	认知距离	组织距离	R²
国际层面	2004	0.985	0.366	-0.411	0.971	0.975
国际层面	2009	0.997	0.224	-0.225	0.997	0.995
国家层面	2004	0.838	0.527	-0.499	0.806	0.749
国家层面	2009	0.952	0.188	-0.338	0.931	0.908
区域层面	2004	0.917	0.761	-0.494	0.9	0.943
区域层面	2009	0.956	0.542	-0.302	0.957	0.920