1960~1990年间渭河下游河段滩槽冲淤动态与机理研究

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2013.010.1268

地理科学 ›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 1268-1276.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2013.010.1268

1960~1990年间渭河下游河段滩槽冲淤动态与机理研究

邵文伟^1,², 师长兴¹(), 范小黎^1,², 周园园^1,²

1.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,中国科学院陆地水循环及地表过程重点实验室,北京 100101
2.中国科学院大学,北京 100049

收稿日期:2012-11-05 修回日期:2013-01-30 出版日期:2013-10-20 发布日期:2013-10-20
作者简介:
作者简介：邵文伟(1985-),浙江金华人,博士研究生,主要从事河流地貌与河道演变研究。E-mail:shaoww.11b@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(40971012)及国家重点基础研究发展计划项目（2011CB403305）资助

Processes and Mechanisms of Sedimentation in Channel and Floodplain in the Lower Weihe River in 1960-1990

Wen-wei SHAO^1,², Chang-xing SHI¹(), Xiao-li FAN^1,², Yuan-yuan ZHOU^1,²

1. Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101,China
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049,China

Received:2012-11-05 Revised:2013-01-30 Online:2013-10-20 Published:2013-10-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用河道断面测量数据计算了1960~1990年渭河下游河槽和滩地冲淤量及其分布的时空变化,分析了变化发生的原因。结果表明：1960~1990年间共淤积泥沙8.88×10⁸m³,且泥沙主要分布在渭淤11断面(WY11)以下河段。滩地淤积量是河槽的1.83倍,滩地冲淤过程以1968年和1982年为转折点分为3个阶段,依次经历了快速淤积、缓慢淤积和侵蚀3个过程。其中淤积以滩面垂向加积为主,侵蚀主要表现为河岸侵蚀后退或坍塌。河槽以1969年为转折点分为快速淤积和轻微淤积(冲刷淤积交替)两个阶段。年内滩地和河槽在汛期整体上淤积,非汛期滩地侵蚀(主要以河道侧向侵蚀形式),而河槽表现为微淤,滩地在汛期堆积和非汛期侵蚀的倾向较河槽明显。三门峡水库在蓄水拦沙(1960年9月~1962年3月)和滞洪排沙(1962年3月~1973年10月)阶段,泥沙淤积上延到渭淤17(WY17)和渭淤27断面(WY27)间河段;实行蓄清排浑(1973年11月~1990年)后溯源淤积大为减弱,淤积未再上延,河道冲淤趋向于平衡。潼关高程是影响河槽和滩地泥沙淤积和释放的主要原因之一。此外,滩地的冲淤量与当年汛期来沙量相关性最高,而河槽冲淤量与当年汛期径流量相关性最高。

关键词: 渭河下游, 冲淤动态, 河漫滩, 河槽, 潼关高程

Abstract:

Cross section measurements were used to calculate the amount and patterns of sediment accumulation and erosion on floodplains and in channel at various spatial and temporal scales in the lower reaches of the Weihe River in 1960-1990, and the causes for the changes in the amount and patterns of sediment accumulation were investigated. Result showed that the total sediment storage amounted to 8.88×10⁸m³in 1960-1990. The amount of sedimentation on floodplain was 1.83 times larger than that in channel and sediment deposition mainly happened in the reaches down the cross-section WY11. By two break points in 1968 and 1982, sedimentation process on floodplain was divided into there stages characterized by fast deposition, slow deposition and sediment release in sequence, in which deposition occurred mainly in the form of vertical accumulation and sediment release mainly resulted from the retreat of river banks. The sedimentation process is channel changed abruptly in 1969. The stage before the year 1969 was featured by fast deposition and with some altermations between deposition and erosion that after the year 1969 was characterized by slight deposion. Sediment aggradation occurred in both floodplain and channel during flood periods, and sediment was released from the floodplain in the form of river bank erosion and weak aggradation took place in channel during the low flow periods. The sediment trapping and releasing was more significant in floodplain than in the channel during these two stages. The sediment deposition extended upstream to the reach between WY17-WY27 when the operation mode of Sanmenxia Dam was storing all water and sediment during 1960-1963 and detaining the floods and sluicing sediment from March 1962 to October 1973, but no more serious further headward sediment deposition occurred when the operation mode was detaining clear water and releasing muddy water from November 1973 to 1990. Sediment deposition on floodplain and in channel was affected mainly by Tongguan elevation, which is used to represent the base level of the Weihe River and is defined as the water level of discharge of 1 000 m³/s at Tongguan near the river's outlet. In addition, the sediment deposition on the floodplain was found to be highly correlated with the sediment load in flood periods, while that in channel was associated with the flood discharge.

Key words: the lower Weihe River, sediment dynamics, floodplain, channel, Tongguan elevation

中图分类号:

P931.1

邵文伟, 师长兴, 范小黎, 周园园. 1960~1990年间渭河下游河段滩槽冲淤动态与机理研究[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(10): 1268-1276.

Wen-wei SHAO, Chang-xing SHI, Xiao-li FAN, Yuan-yuan ZHOU. Processes and Mechanisms of Sedimentation in Channel and Floodplain in the Lower Weihe River in 1960-1990[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2013, 33(10): 1268-1276.

图/表 11

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

参考文献 24

[1]	Kesel R H,Yodis E G,Mccraw D J.An approximation of the sediment budget of the lower Mississippi River prior to major human modification[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,1992,17:711-722.
[2]	Trimble S W.Fluvial processes, morphology and sediment budgets in the Coon Creek Basin, WI, USA, 1975-1993[J].Geomorphology,2009,108:8-23.
[3]	Visser F,Roth C H,Wassow R,et al.A sediment budget for a cultivated floodplain in tropical North Queensland, Australia[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2007,32:1475-1490.
[4]	Allison M A,Demas C H,Ebersole B A,et al.A water and sediment budget for the lower Mississippi-Atchafalaya River in flood years2008-2010: Implications for sediment discharge to the oceans and coastal restoration in Louisiana[J].Journal of Hydrology,2012,432-433:84-97.
[5]	李文学,张翠萍,姜乃迁,等.潼关高程变化及其对渭河下游淤积的影响[J].泥沙研究,2003,(3):24~29.
[6]	李昌志,王兆印,吴保生.潼关高程下降对渭河下游河床演变的影响[J].泥沙研究,2005,(2):45~53.
[7]	李琦,宋进喜,宋令勇.渭河下游河道泥沙淤积及其对河床比降的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2010,24(9):110~113.
[8]	张翠萍,张超,伊晓燕,等.渭河下游洪水冲淤特性及不淤临界流量分析[J].人民黄河,2011,33(2):27~31.
[9]	张根广,王新宏,冯民权.渭河下游河道淤积发展及其萎缩的原因浅析[J].泥沙研究,2003,(3):35~38.
[10]	中国科学院地理研究所渭河研究组.渭河下游河流地貌[M].北京:科学出版社,1983.
[11]	孙继敏,许立亮.汾渭地堑的河流阶地对第四纪时期印度-欧亚板块碰撞带的构造响应[J].第四纪研究,2007,27(1):20~26.
[12]	许炯心. 黄河干流龙门至三门峡间泥沙沉积汇的研究[J].地理学报,2009,64(5):515~530.
[13]	许炯心. 近50年来降水变化和人类活动对黄河入海径流通量的影响[J].水科学进展,2003,14(6):690~695.
[14]	粟晓玲,康绍忠,魏晓妹,等.气候变化和人类活动对渭河流域入黄径流的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2007,35(2):153~159.
[15]	龙毓骞,梁国亭,张原峰.黄河下游断面资料数据库及冲淤分布初步分析[J].水文,2002,22(4):28~31.
[16]	舒彩文, 谈广鸣.河道冲淤量计算方法研究进展[J].泥沙研究,2009,(4):68~73.
[17]	申冠卿,姜乃迁,张原锋,等.黄河下游断面法与沙量法冲淤计算成果比较及输沙率资料修正[J].泥沙研究,2006,(1):32~37.
[18]	程龙渊,刘栓明,肖俊法,等.黄河下游河道冲淤量计算问题研究[J].人民黄河,1998,20(2):4~7.
[19]	连惠萍,张志林,霍瑞敬.黄河下游淤积测量误差分析与冲淤计算方法研究[J].人民黄河,2004,26(9):1~3.
[20]	钱宁,张仁,周志德.河床演变学[M].北京:科学出版社,1987.
[21]	Gautier E,Brunstein D,Vauchel P,et al.Channel and floodplain sediment dynamics in a reach of the tropical meandering Rio Beni(Bolivian Amazonia)[J].Earth Surface Process and Landforms,2010,35:1838-1853.
[22]	Benedetti M M.Controls on overbank deposition in the Upper Mississippi River[J]. Geomorphology,2003,56:271-290.
[23]	王宏,杨国礼,王瑞芳.渭河流域水利水保措施对泥沙、径流影响分析计算[J].水土保持学报,1994,14(5):48~52.
[24]	吴保生,王光谦,王兆印,等.来水来沙对潼关高程的影响及变化规律[J].科学通报,2004,49(14):1461~1465.

1960~1990年间渭河下游河段滩槽冲淤动态与机理研究

Processes and Mechanisms of Sedimentation in Channel and Floodplain in the Lower Weihe River in 1960-1990

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 24

相关文章 7

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	刘慰, 王随继, 王彦君. 黄河下游河道断面形态参数变化及其水沙过程响应[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(9): 1563-1572.
[2]	师长兴. 黄河上游内蒙古段河床演变及其与水沙变化的关系[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(6): 895-901.
[3]	张凌华, 张振克, 符跃鑫, 陈影影, 蒋大亮, 张志荣, 蒋松柳. 长江下游南京-镇江河段河漫滩粒度特征[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(9): 1183-1190.
[4]	吴文恒, 刘焱序. 渭河下游农户生活用能的区域地理特征响应[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(12): 1506-1513.
[5]	曹光杰, 爨景波, 李彦彦. 长江江苏段末次盛冰期古河槽特征[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(8): 986-992.
[6]	李谢辉, 王磊, 谭灵芝, 郑奕. 渭河下游河流沿线区域洪水灾害风险评价[J]. 地理科学, 2009, 29(5): 733-739.
[7]	李景宜. 陕西渭河下游湿地环境风险因素分析[J]. 地理科学, 2007, 27(3): 371-375.