Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊介绍 期刊订阅 广告合作 联系我们 English
旧版网站  
 
优先出版  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  热点文章  |  阅读排行  |  下载排行  |  引用排行
地理科学    2014, Vol. 34 Issue (12): 1462-1469     DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2014.012.1462
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
文学旅游地的空间重构研究——以凤凰古城为例
安宁1,2,朱竑1,刘晨3
1.华南师范大学文化产业与文化地理研究中心,广东 广州 510631
2.格拉斯哥大学地理与地球科学系,英国 格拉斯哥 G128QQ
3.伦敦大学皇家赫洛威学院地理系,英国 伦敦 TW200EX
The Reconstruction of Literary Tourist Destination: A Case Study of Fenghuang
Ning AN1,2,Hong ZHU1,Chen LIU3
1.Centre for Social and Cultural Geography,South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510631,China
2.School of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G128QQ,UK
3. Department of Geography, Royal Holloway, University of London,London TW200EX,UK
全文: PDF (581 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)     
摘要 

文学和旅游之间关系十分密切,以文学旅游地为切入点,运用定性研究方法分析了凤凰古城如何通过文学和旅游的影响实现其空间重构,得到结论如下:① 开发者的旅游开发行为迅速改变了凤凰的社会经济结构,在其旅游发展过程中,不同权力主体(政府、开发商、小成本经营者、旅游者等)之间的权力博弈实现了空间的“权力化”重构;② 以沈从文及其作品等为代表的湘西文学作品和旅游者的地方想象共同建构了凤凰古城的地方形象,文学和旅游的“邂逅”赋予凤凰诗性的想象空间,实现了凤凰古城诗性空间的构建;③ 权力空间和诗性空间的建构过程是相互影响的:权力空间的构建过程中包含了权力主体对诗性空间建构过程的运用;反之,诗性空间的建构过程也包含着不同权力主体对空间的利用和争夺,并受之影响。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
安宁
朱竑
刘晨
关键词 文学旅游地空间重构权力空间诗性空间凤凰 
Abstract

Drawing on the qualitative research methods, especially the methods of observation, interview, and textual analysis, this article focuses on the study of the ancient town of Fenghuang. This article concerns on its space “encountering” between tourism and literature and analyzes how Fenghuang achieves its space reconstruction through the interaction between them. Based on the conceptual understanding of space that is proposed by Henry Lefebvre, Edward Soja, and David Harvey, this article discusses the process of space (re)construction in Fenghuang, including how “the material space” (re)produces “the conceived space” or/and “the space of power” which is governed by the power from the principal parts, and how it construct the “poetic space” which affected by human behavior in social practice. These findings indicate that: 1) the development of tourism changes the socio-economic structure of Fenghuang rapidly, and then the focus of its spatial attributes shifts after that, through which it achieves the reconstructing process from the original ecology of the paradise-like substances to the space full of power games. In this process, the local government and the developers have played the pivotal roles, in which they integrated and reproduced the space of Fenghuang and (re)constructed it as a “space of power” through their negotiations and gaming with civilians, retail managers and tourists. 2) Accompanied with tourists’ geographical imaginations, Shen Congwen, and his literary have constructed the ‘real’ images of Fenghuang. This process achieves the “poetical” construction of Fenghuang through which both the labels of literary tourist destination are produced and the “poetical” constructed space which is consumed by tourists through an imaginative way. 3) The (re)construction process of “space of power” and “poetic space” interacts with each other. The construction of the “poetic space” is included in the process of the construction of space of power; on the contrary, the construction of space of power is also affecting the construction of the “poetic space”. Literary promotes the development of tourism, and on the contrary, the development of tourism affects the image of tourists’ imaginations directly and indirectly. On the basis of these findings, we can conclude that the space (re)construction of Fenghuang is affected by the literary and tourism through which the material space of Fenghuang is viewed as space of literary destination with the attributes of materiality, scope of power, and symbolism. As an entry point, literary tourism is explored in this study, which on the one hand enriches the understanding of the meaning of space, and expands the existing theories of space construction; on the other hand, it develops a positive value and significance for tourists’ behavior, tourism developing and other researches.

Key wordsliterary tourism    space reconstruction    space of power    poetic space    Fenghuang
收稿日期: 2013-07-15      出版日期: 2016-05-28
基金资助:国家自然科学基金(41171125;41301140)、国家留学基金(201306380085)广东省自然科学基金(S2011010005996;10251063101000007)资助
作者简介: 安宁(1987-), 男, 陕西汉中人, 博士研究生, 研究方向为地缘政治和社会文化地理.E-mail:n.an.1@research.gla.ac.uk
引用本文:   
安宁, 朱竑, 刘晨 . 文学旅游地的空间重构研究——以凤凰古城为例[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(12): 1462-1469.
Ning AN, Hong ZHU, Chen LIU . The Reconstruction of Literary Tourist Destination: A Case Study of Fenghuang[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2014, 34(12): 1462-1469.
链接本文:  
http://geoscien.neigae.ac.cn/CN/10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2014.012.1462      或      http://geoscien.neigae.ac.cn/CN/Y2014/V34/I12/1462
Fig.1  具有文学气息的商品和店铺名称
[1] Herbert D.Literary places, tourism and the heritage experiences[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2001, 28(2):312-333.
[2] Robinson M, Andersen H C.Literature and tourism: Essays in the reading and writing of tourism[M]. London: Continuum, 2002:3.
[3] 安宁, 朱竑. 他者, 权力与地方建构: 想象地理的研究进展与展望[J]. 人文地理, 2013, 28(1):20~25,47.
[4] Eagle D, Carnell H.The Oxford literary guide to the British Isles[M]. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1977:5.
[5] Gregory D. Between the book and the lamp:Imaginative geography of Egypt,1849-50[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 1995, 20(1):29-57.
[6] Mansson M.Mediatized tourism[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2011, 38(4):1634-1652.
[7] 李春敏. 列斐伏尔的空间生产理论探析[J]. 人文杂志, 2011, (1):62~68.
[8] Lefebvre H.The suvival of capitalism: Reproduction of the relation of production[M]. London: Allison & Busby, 1976:38-39, 262.
[9] 童强. 空间哲学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2011:32~34.
[10] Lefebvre H. The production of space[M].Oxford: Blackwell, 1991:16, 73, 86.
[11] Soja E W.Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996:81, 87.
[12] Wright J K.Terrae incognitae: The place of the imagination in geography[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1947, 37(1):1-15.
[13] Said E.Orientalism[M]. New York: Vintage, 1978:49-52.
[14] 陆扬. 空间理论和文学空间[J]. 外国文学研究, 2004, (4):31~37.
[15] 吴红涛. 大卫·哈维空间理论研究的逻辑架构及方法取径[J]. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2012, 39(6):24~28.
[16] Crang M.Cultural geography[M]. London and New York: Routledge, 1998:57.
[17] 常芳. 中国古典小说及其视觉化再生产中的空间叙事[J]. 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2009, 29(3):165~169.
[18] 亨利·;列斐弗尔. 政治与空间[M]. 李春译.上海:上海人民出版社, 2008:139.
[19] Herbert D.Artistic and literary places in France as tourist attractions[J]. Tourism Management, 1996, 17(2):77-85.
[20] 江波, 彭文喜. 凤凰文化旅游发展理念研究[J]. 湖南广播电视大学学报, 2012, 52(4):78~82.
[21] 王兆峰. 湘西凤凰县民族文化旅游创意产业发展研究[J]. 中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2010, 37(2):21~29.
[22] 徐波. “长河漂泊古朴意,边城泛化凤凰魂”——湘西凤凰古城有机保护原则的建立与实施[D]. 天津:天津大学,2004.
[23] 加斯顿·巴什拉.空间的诗学[M]. 张逸婧译.上海:上海译文出版社, 2009:1~3.
[24] 徐小平, 赵士化. 行将凋零的爱与美——从《边城》看沈从文的“湘西世界”[J]. 合肥学院学报, 2005, 22(2):116~119.
[1] 薛冰, 张黎明, 耿涌, 任婉侠, 逯承鹏, 田旭. 基于空间重构视角的老工业区人地关系研究——以沈阳市铁西区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(7): 890-897.
[2] 吴启焰. 新自由主义城市空间重构的批判视角研究[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(7): 769-774.
[3] 周寅康, 包浩生, 张捷. 淮河流域洪涝变化吸引子维数研究[J]. 地理科学, 1998, 18(4): 362-367.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《地理科学》编辑部
地址:长春市高新北区盛北大街4888号 邮编:130102 电话:+86 431 85542324 E-mail: geoscien@neigae.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn