地理科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 64-71.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.01.008

• • 上一篇    下一篇

多中心空间结构经济绩效的研究进展及启示

孙斌栋(), 丁嵩()   

  1. 1.华东师范大学中国现代城市研究中心/城市与区域科学学院,上海 200062
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-23 修回日期:2016-02-14 出版日期:2017-01-15 发布日期:2017-01-15
  • 作者简介:

    作者简介:孙斌栋(1970-),男,河北阜平人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事城市地理与经济地理研究。E-mail: bdsun@re.ecnu.edu.cn

  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41471139)、上海哲学社会科学规划课题(2014BCK003)、华东师范大学优秀博士学位论文培育项目(PY2015001)、教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地基金 (16JJD790012)资助

Progress and Implications for Polycentric Spatial Structure’s Effect on Economic Performance

Bindong Sun1(), Song Ding1()   

  1. 1.Center for Modern Chinese City Studies / School of Urban and Regional Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
  • Received:2015-12-23 Revised:2016-02-14 Online:2017-01-15 Published:2017-01-15
  • Supported by:
    National Nature Science Foundation of China (41471139), Shanghai Social Science Foundation (2014BCK003), Excellent Doctoral Dissertation Cultivation Project of East China Normal University (PY2015001),MOE Project Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences at Universities (16JJD790012).

摘要:

通过回顾国外多中心经济绩效的相关理论与实证研究,探讨多中心空间结构的经济绩效,特别是单中心与多中心绩效的对比研究,得出如下结论:由于城市之间可以通过“互借规模”、发挥专业化分工与协作的比较优势,加之较小的城市规模可以相对避免集聚不经济的产生,多中心空间结构理论上可以获得同等规模单一城市享有的集聚经济;受城市规模、发展阶段、地理空间尺度、功能联系、行业构成的异质性等因素影响,多中心空间结构的经济绩效表现不一。最后提出了深化国内研究的方向以及相关政策启示。

关键词: 空间结构, 多中心, 集聚经济, 经济绩效

Abstract:

Implementing polycentric development strategy is seen, by substantial urban and regional planning, as the major policy instrument to achieve the objective of spatial balanced development in China. However, the question whether the polycentric spatial structure is economically efficient or not is not answered, especially the economic performance comparison between mono-centric and polycentric spatial structure. Based on classifying the relative theoretical and empirical studies on polycentric economic performance, this article concludes the following findings. Firstly, in theory, polycentric spatial structure can obtain agglomeration economy enjoyed by one single city under the same size through ‘borrowed size’, specialization and cooperation among cities, and relatively avoiding agglomeration diseconomy owing to the small size. Secondly, in practice, the consensus that polycentric spatial structure is economically efficient has not yet achieved owing to the heterogeneity of urban size, economic development level, geographical scale, functional connections and industrial type. In the end, we put forward some directions for domestic research and policy implications. The first priority is to build the academic framework for study on polycentric spatial structure, including spatial layout measurement, performance identification and mechanism analysis. What's more, deepening the characteristics identification and evolution analysis of polycentric spatial structure is necessary. For instance, we can make use of new techniques and methods, such as big data, to measure the spatial structure of different scales, and lay more emphasis on the functional linkage. Finally, we should pay more attention to the comparative study between China and foreign countries, for instance, analyzing the different roles of governments in the formation of polycentric spatial structure.

Key words: spatial structure, polycentric, agglomeration economy, economic performance

中图分类号: 

  • F293