长江三角洲地区门户功能演化与驱动机理

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.07.003

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用综合指数评价、基尼系数、标准差椭圆等方法分析了2004~2014年长江三角洲地区门户功能的空间格局及其演化过程。结果表明：① 长江三角洲地区城市门户功能上升趋势明显,空间上由“一极三强”的格局演变为“一极四强”;② 各类门户功能的空间差异整体上呈缩小趋势,其中国际门户功能的差异明显大于综合和国内门户功能,而组间差异是导致门户功能差异的主要原因;③ 所有门户功能均由南-北方向分布向东-西方向分布转型。长三角地区门户功能的演化是由多重因素驱动形成的,国内和国际门户功能的驱动机理存在明显差异。

关键词: 长江三角洲地区, 门户功能, 门户城市, 基尼系数, 标准差椭圆

Abstract:

Under the background of globalization and localization, the gateway city has become important geographical unit which links the global production network and the gateway function of the cities, and attracts more and more people's attention. From the perspective of geographical space, this article attempts to portray the city's gateway function and explore its driving mechanism, and consider the passenger and cargo flow of three dimensions consisting of water, land and air transport. Based on the data of the main gateway cities in the Yangtze River Delta Region (YRDR) during 2004-2014, the spatial pattern and evolution of the gateway function in YRDR is analyzed by using the comprehensive evaluation index, the Gini coefficient and the standard deviation ellipse. The main results can be summarized as follows: 1) On the whole, the gateway function of cities in YRDR increases clearly. Shanghai, Ningbo, Nanjing and Hangzhou always have strong gateway function in YRDR, and the gateway function pattern of this region has changed from “one pole three strong” to “one pole four strong” with the rapid advancement of gateway function in Suzhou since 2010, which also reflects that the spatial pattern of gateway function in YRDR has the stability and significant path dependence. 2) The spatial differentiation state of international gateway function is obviously larger than that of the comprehensive and domestic gateway function, but the distribution pattern of the three kinds of gateway function tends to be equilibrium in space. The main reason for the spatial differentiation of gateway function in YRDR is the difference between the two gradient cities. 3) The international gateway function of the eastern region is stronger than that of western region, but the discrepancy between them is narrowing. In the meanwhile, the spatial patterns of all the three types of gateway function are transforming from the pattern of south-north distribution to the pattern of east-west distribution. 4) The pattern of gateway function and its evolution in YRDR are driven by multiple factors. Through the fixed panel regression model, the economic and social environment factors such as population density, industrial structure and informationization level all play significant roles in promoting the comprehensive and domestic gateway function, while the improvement of the international gateway function is more closely related to the economic behavior factors. At the same time, financial development level has no significant impact on the domestic or international in YRDR.

Key words: Yangtze River Delta Region, gateway function, gateway city, Gini coefficient, standard deviational ellipse

中图分类号:

F572/U12

蒋自然, 曹有挥, 叶士琳. 长江三角洲地区门户功能演化与驱动机理[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(7): 987-996.

Ziran Jiang, Youhui Cao, Shilin Ye. The Evolution of Gateway Function and Mechanism in the Yangtze River Delta Region[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2017, 37(7): 987-996.

图/表 8

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表2

表3

参考文献 30

[1]	刘卫东, 陆大道. 新时期我国区域空间规划的方法论探讨——以“西部开发重点区域规划前期研究”为例[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(6): 894-902. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2005.06.002
	[Liu Weidong, Lu Dadao.Methodological basis for making regional spatial planning in China in new era: A preliminary study based on planning of planning key economic regions in developing west China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(6): 894-902.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2005.06.002
[2]	McKenzie R D. Metropolitan community[J]. New York: McGraw-Hill Book, 1933.
[3]	Burghardt A F.A hypothesis about gateway cities[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1971, 61(2): 269-285. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1971.tb00782.x
[4]	Bird J H.Of central places, cities and seaports[J]. Geography, 1973, 58: 105-118.
[5]	Short J R, Breitbach C, Buckman S et al. From world cities to gateway cities: Extending the boundaries of globalization theory[J]. City, 2000, 4(3): 317-340. doi: 10.1080/713657031
[6]	Russell J C.Medieval regions and their cities[M]. London: Newton Abbot, 1972.
[7]	Taylor P J.World city network: A global urban analysis[M]. London: Routledge, 2004.
[8]	陆大道. 二⚪⚪⚪年我国工业生产力布局总图的科学基础[J]. 地理科学, 1986, 6(2): 110-118.
	[Lu Dadao.Scientific basis for the overall plan of industrial productive allocation of China up to 2000.Scientia Geographica Sinica, 1986, 6(2): 110-118. ]
[9]	陆玉麒. 区域双核结构模式的形成机理[J]. 地理学报, 2002, 57(1): 85-95. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2002.01.010
	[Lu Yuqi.The mechanism of the model of dual-nuclei structure.Acta Geographica Sinica, 2002, 57(1): 85-95.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2002.01.010
[10]	陆玉麒, 董平. 区域空间结构模式的发生学解释——区域双核结构模式理论地位的判别[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(9): 1035-1042.
	[Lu Yuqi, Dong Ping.Genesis explanation of regional spatial structure model: theoretical status of dual-nuclei structure model. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2011, 31(9): 1035-1042.]
[11]	朱翔, 贺清云. 我国双星式城市研究[J]. 经济地理, 2000, 20(6): 70-73.
	[Zhu Xiang, He Qingyun.Researches on double-star cities of our country. Economic Geography, 2000, 20(6): 70-73.]
[12]	文玉钊. 西向开放对国家空间结构的影响——基于西北门户方向研究视角[D]. 南京: 南京师范大学, 2016.
	[Wen Yuzhao.The influence of the west opening to the national spatial structure—Based on the research perspective of northwest gateway direction. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University, 2016.]
[13]	张国华, 周乐, 黄坤鹏, 等. 高速交通网络构建下的城镇空间结构发展趋势——从 “中心节点” 到 “门户节点”[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2011 (3): 27-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3363.2011.03.004
	[Zhang Guohua, Zhou Le, Huang Kunpeng et al.From city center to city gateway—Research on the evolution tendency of urban spatial structure. Urban Planning Forum, 2011 (3): 27-32.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3363.2011.03.004
[14]	郭建科, 王丹丹, 王利, 等. 基于内外联系的双核型区域交通可达性研究——以辽宁省为例[J]. 经济地理, 2015 (11): 71-77. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2015.11.010
	[Guo Jianke, Wang Dandan, Wang Li et al. The traffic accessibility in dual-nuclei area based on internal and external links—A case of Liaoning Province. Economic Geography, 2015 (11): 71-77.] doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2015.11.010
[15]	荣朝和. 论交通运输在经济时空推移和结构演变中的宏观作用[J]. 地理学报, 1995 (5): 394-401.
	[Rong Chaohe.Amacro effect of transport in the change of economic spatial structure.Acta Geographica Sinica, 1995 (5): 394-401.]
[16]	杨仲元, 卢松. 交通发展对区域旅游空间结构的影响研究——以皖南旅游区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(7): 806-814.
	[Yang Zhongyuan, Lu Song.The impacts of traffic improvements on spatial structure of regional tourism: Case of southern Anhui. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013, 33(7): 806-814.]
[17]	Hensher D A, Truong T P, Mulley C et al. Assessing the wider economy impacts of transport infrastructure investment with an illustrative application to the North-West Rail Link project in Sydney, Australia[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2012, 24: 292-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.009
[18]	O’Connor K, Fuellhart K. The fortunes of air transport gateways[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2015, 46: 164-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.06.013
[19]	张梦天, 王成金,王成龙. 上海港港区区位与功能演变及动力机制[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(9): 1767-1782. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201609014
	[Zhang Mengtian, Wang Chengjin, Wang Chenglong.Regional evolution, function evolvement and driving mechanism in the development of Shanghai port. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(9): 1767-1782. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201609014
[20]	Takebayashi M.Multiple hub network and high-speed railway: Connectivity, gateway, and airport leakage[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2015, 79: 55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.03.024
[21]	宋周莺,车姝韵,王姣娥. 东北地区的创新能力演化及其经济带动作用分析[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(9): 1388-1396.
	[Song Zhouying, Che Shuyun, Wang Jiaoe.Thespatio-temporal analysis of regional innovation capacity and its economic contribution in Northeast China.Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016, 36(9): 1388-1396.]
[22]	Wang J J, Cheng M C.From a hub port city to a global supply chain management center: A case study of Hong Kong[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2010, 18(1): 104-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.02.009
[23]	Wang G W Y, Zeng Q, Li Ket al. Port connectivity in a logistic network: The case of Bohai Bay, China[M]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2016.
[24]	国家统计局城市社会经济调查司. 中国城市统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2005-2015.
	[DUSNBSC.China City Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2005-2015.]
[25]	中国交通运输协会. 中国交通年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国交通年鉴社, 2005-2015.
	[China Communications and Transportation Association.Yearbook of China Transportation and Communications. Beijing: Yearbook House of China Transportation and Communications, 2005-2015.]
[26]	中国民用航空局. 从统计看民航[M]. 北京: 中国民航出版社, 2005-2015.
	[Civil Aviation Administration of China.From the statistical view of Civil Aviation. Beijing: China Civil Aviation Press, 2005-2015.]
[27]	赵作权. 地理空间分布整体统计研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 28(1): 1-8. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2009.01.001
	[Zhao Zuoquan.Global statistics of spatial distribution: A literature review. Progress in Geography, 2010, 28(1): 1-8.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2009.01.001
[28]	褚艳玲, 宫之光, 杨忠振. 21 世纪以来中国航空货运空间变化研究[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(3): 335-341.
	[Chu Yanling, Gong Zhiguang, Yang Zhongzhen.The spatial pattern of China air cargo transportation in 21stcentury.Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016, 36(3): 335-341.]
[29]	王姣娥, 胡浩. 中国高铁与民航的空间服务市场竞合分析与模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(2): 175-185. doi: 10.11821/xb201302003
	[Wang Jiaoe, Hu Hao.Competition and cooperation of high-speed rail and air transport in China: A perspective from spatial service market view. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(2): 175-185.] doi: 10.11821/xb201302003
[30]	丁金学, 金凤君, 王姣娥, 等. 高铁与民航的竞争博弈及其空间效应——以京沪高铁为例[J]. 经济地理, 2013, 33(5): 104-110.
	[Ding Jinxue, Jin Fengjun, Wang Jiaoe et al. Competition game of high-speed rail and civil aviation and its spatial effect: A case study of Beijing-Shanghai high-speed rail. Economic Geography, 2013, 33(5): 104-110.]

类别	一级指标	二级指标（权重）
综合门户功能	港口指标	货物吞吐量（0.139）,集装箱吞吐量（0.139）
	铁路指标	铁路客运量（0.15）,铁路货运量（0.058）
	公路指标	公路客运量（0.108）,公路货运量（0.149）
	民航指标	旅客吞吐量（0.133）,货邮吞吐量（0.124）
国内门户功能	港口指标	内贸货物吞吐量（0.157）,内贸箱吞吐量（0.121）
	铁路指标	铁路客运量（0.169）,铁路货运量（0.071）
	公路指标	公路客运量（0.137）,公路货运量（0.181）
	民航指标	国内旅客吞吐量（0.101）,国内货邮吞吐量（0.063）
国际门户功能	港口指标	外贸货物吞吐量（0.221）,外贸箱吞吐量（0.279）
国际门户功能	民航指标	国际旅客吞吐量（0.35）,国际货邮吞吐量（0.159）

类型	划分依据			城市
类型		国内门户	国际门户	2004年	2014年
双重优势型	强	强		上海、宁波	上海、宁波、苏州
国内优势型	强		弱	杭州、南京、苏州	杭州、南京
国际优势型	弱		强	无	舟山
双重劣势型	弱		弱	绍兴、温州、无锡、镇江、南通、常州、湖州、台州、嘉兴、扬州、舟山、泰州	无锡、温州、南通、舟山、常州、嘉兴、台州、绍兴、镇江、泰州、扬州、湖州

门户功能		X₁	X₂	X₃	X₄	X₅	X₆	X₇	X₈
综合门户	模型1		4.734^***	0.141	0.062	0.45^***
	模型2	3.281^***	8.128^***				0.123	0.269
	模型3	3.386^***	8.039^***				0.288		0.199
	模型4			0.155	0.046	0.548^***
国内门户	模型5		2.977^**	0.221	0.034	0.363^***
	模型6	3.426^***	6.444^***				0.021	0.324
	模型7	3.499^***	6.34^***				0.11		0.304
	模型8			0.23	0.024	0.424^***
国际门户	模型9	3.857	5.739^*	1.235^***
	模型10	3.809	5.433^*						1.127^***
	模型11	2.918	6.446^*			-0.417		1.25^***
	模型12				0.011	-0.277	1.944^***