基于共生理论的中国沿海省市海洋经济生态协调模式研究

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.03.003

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

建立海洋生态与海洋经济的共生演化Logistic模型,通过压力-状态-影响-响应（PSIR）模型对Logistic模型中的基本指数进行求解,进一步计算海洋生态与海洋经济之间的共生系数,结果表明：天津和上海两市发展模式已摆脱资源索取模式,其海洋经济生态共生模式的探讨意义较小;其余沿海九省中,河北、江苏、广西和海南4省处于反向共生水平,辽宁和山东两省呈现并生模式,浙江和广东呈现出生态受益的偏利共生模式,福建则呈现出经济受害的偏利共生模式。根据沿海各省市海洋经济生态共生模式,提出相关的政策建议,以期对沿海省市今后的经济和生态发展模式提供理论依据。

关键词: 共生理论, Logistic模型, 经济生态系统, 沿海11省市

Abstract:

With the rapid development of China’s marine economy, a large number of human and capital flocked to the coastal area, which also resulted in the destruction of the marine ecological environment. Despite the response measures have been taken, but still with little success. Therefore, it is of great practical significance which could guide the economic and ecological construction of coastal areas in China to explore the internal mechanism between the marine economic development and the marine ecological construction. The marine composite system has both economic and ecological attributes, which can be regarded as a community(symbiosis environment) of two “populations” including marine economy and marine ecology(symbiotic unit), and the input of human capital will change the flow of elements(symbiotic matrix) between marine economy and marine ecology when it raises the density of one “population” which leading the symbiosis theory has its rationality in the study of the interaction between marine economy and marine ecology. Compared to the grasp of marine economy and ecological coordination degree on the whole, the calculation of symbiotic pattern can not only distinguish the development model of the marine composite system on the whole, but also can analyze the influence of marine economy and ecology due to the development model of symbiosis, to clear the direction of future development. In this article, the Pressure-State-Impact-Response(PSIR) model of marine composite has been established to evaluate the level of marine ecology, marine economy, and marine environmental capacity. We find that the ecological level and economic level of eleven provinces and cities in China’s coastal area are mostly steady and rising, and the environmental capacity remains basically stable from 2004 to 2013. On this basis, the symbiosis model of marine ecology and marine economy is discussed based on the Logistic model, and the results show that Tianjin and Shanghai have been out of resource demand model, and there marine economic and ecological symbiotic coefficient is less significant; In other nine provinces, Hebei, Jiangsu, Guangxi and Hainan are in reverse symbiosis patterns, Liaoning and Shandong, are in individual development patterns, while Zhejiang and Guangdong, showing the ecological benefit of commensalism patterns, and Fujian is economic suffer partial interest symbiosis pattern. Overall, China’s marine ecology and marine economic development still remain in the restricted or isolated development stage, especially the situation which achieving the promotion of marine economy by sacrificing marine ecological development is pervasive, and marine ecological construction can not support the development of marine economy effectively. At last, this article puts forward some relevant policy suggestions according to the marine economic and ecological symbiotic model, in order to provide theoretical basis for the future economic and ecological development in coastal provinces and cities.

Key words: symbiotic theory, logistic model, economic ecosystem, 11 coastal provinces and cities

中图分类号:

F129.9

王嵩, 孙才志, 范斐. 基于共生理论的中国沿海省市海洋经济生态协调模式研究[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(3): 342-350.

Song Wang, Caizhi Sun, Fei Fan. Marine Economic and Ecological Symbiosis form of Coastal Provinces and Cities in China Based on Symbiosis Theory[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2018, 38(3): 342-350.

图/表 4

图1

表1

表2

图2

参考文献 21

[1]	韩增林,李彬,张坤领,等.基于CiteSpace中国海洋经济研究的知识图谱分析[J].地理科学, 2016,36(5): 643-652. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.05.001
	[Han Zenglin, Li Bin, Zhang Kunling et al. Knowledge structure of China’s marine economy research: An analysis based on cite space map. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016, 36(5): 643-652.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.05.001
[2]	高源,韩增林,杨俊,等.中国海洋产业空间集聚及其协调发展研究[J].地理科学,2015,35(8):946-951.
	[Gao Yuan, Han Zenglin, Yang Jun et al. Spatial agglomeration of marine industries and region coordinated development in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(8): 946-951.]
[3]	Sun Caizhi, Wang Song, Zou Wei.Chinese marine ecosystem services value: Regional and structural equilibrium analysis[J].Ocean & Coastal Management, 2016, 125: 70-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.03.001
[4]	Sun Caizhi, Wang Song, Zou Wei et al. Estimating the efficiency of complex marine systems in China’s coastal regions using a network Data Envelope Analysis model[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2017(139): 77-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.02.005
[5]	李洪英,胡求光,胡彬彬.浙江省海洋经济与生态环境的协调发展研究——基于低碳经济的视角[J].华东经济管理,2011,25(6):11-14.
	[Li Hongying, Hu Qiuguang, Hu Binbin.Research of coordinated development between marine economy and ecological environment in Zhejiang Province—Based on the perspective of a low-carbon economy. East China Economic Management,2011,25(6):11-14.]
[6]	叶属峰,房建孟.长江三角洲海洋生态建设与区域海洋经济可持续发展[J]. 海洋环境科学,2006,6(25):68-72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6336.2006.z1.017
	[Ye Shufeng, Fang Jianmeng.Construction of oceanic ecology and sustainable development of regional oceanic economy in the Yangtze River Delta. Marine Environmental Science, 2006,6(25):68-72.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6336.2006.z1.017
[7]	狄乾斌,韩增林.辽宁省海洋经济可持续发展的演进特征及其系统耦合模式[J].经济地理,2009,29(5):799-805.
	[Di Qianbin,Han Zenglin.Analysis of evolutionary characteristics of sustainable development of marine economy and its system coupling pattern in Liaoning Province. Economic Geography, 2009,29(5):799-805.]
[8]	高强,周佳佳,高乐华.沿海地区海洋经济-社会-生态协调度研究——以山东省为例[J].海洋环境科学,2013,32(6):902-906.
	[Gao Qiang, Zhou Jiajia, Gao Lehua.Coastal marine economic-social-ecological coordination degree research—Take Shandongas the example. Marine Environmental Science, 2013,32(6):902-906.]
[9]	高乐华,高强.海洋生态经济系统交互胁迫关系验证及其协调度测算[J]. 资源科学,2012,34(1):173-184.
	[Gao Lehua, Gao Qiang.Validation and calculation of the coordination degree of interactive relationships in the marine eco-economic system.Resources Science, 2012,34(1):173-184.]
[10]	徐胜,张超.低碳视角下环渤海地区海洋经济与生态环境协调性研究[J]. 中国渔业经济,2013,4(31):146-152. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-590X.2013.04.022
	[Xu Sheng,Zhang Chao.Research of coordinated development between marine economy and ecological environment in Bohai area region in the perspective of a low-carbon economy. Chinese Fisheries Economics, 2013,4(31):146-152.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-590X.2013.04.022
[11]	James C R.Designing learning organizations[J]. Organizational Dynamics, 2003, 32(1):46-61. doi: 10.1016/S0090-2616(02)00137-7
[12]	张智光. 林业生态安全的共生耦合测度模型与判据[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(8):90-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2014.08.012
	[Zhang Zhiguang.Measuring model and criterion of forestry ecological security by symbiotic coupling method. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2014,24(8):90-99.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2014.08.012
[13]	Di Qianbin, Dong Shaoyu.Symbiotic state of chinese land-marine economy[J]. Chin. Geogra. Sci., 2017, 27(2): 176-187. doi: 10.1007/s11769-017-0857-y
[14]	唐强荣,徐学军,何自力.生产性服务业与制造业共生发展模型及实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2009,12(3):20-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2009.03.004
	[Tang Qiangrong,Xu Xuejun, He Zili.A model and empirical study of the symbiotic development between the producer-service industry and the manufacturing industry.Nankai Business Review, 2009,12(3):20-26.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2009.03.004
[15]	孙才志,覃雄合,李博,等.基于WSBM模型的环渤海地区海洋经济脆弱性研究[J].地理科学,2016,36(5):705-714. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.05.008
	[Sun Caizhi, Qin Xionghe, Li Bo et al.Assessment of marine economy vulnerability of coastal cities in Bohai Sea Ring Area based on WSBM model. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016, 36(5):705-714.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.05.008
[16]	李博,杨智,苏飞,等.基于集对分析的中国海洋经济系统脆弱性分析[J]. 地理科学,2016,36(1):47-54. doi: 10.1329/j.cnki.sgs.2016.01.006
	[Li Bo, Yang Zhi, Su Fei et al. Vulnerability measurement of Chinese marine economic system based on set pair analysis. Scientia GeographicaSinica,2016, 36(1):47-54.] doi: 10.1329/j.cnki.sgs.2016.01.006
[17]	范斐,孙才志.辽宁省海洋经济与陆域经济协同发展研究[J].地域研究与开发,2011,30(2):59-63.
	[Fan Fei, Sun Caizhi.Research on the cooperation development of marine & inland economy in Liaoning Province. Areal Research and Development,2011, 30(2): 59-63.]
[18]	Song Wang, Caizhi Sun, Xin Li et al. Sustainable development in China’s Coastal Area: Based on the driver-pressure-state-welfare-response framework and the data envelopment analysis model[J]. Sustainability, 2016, 8: 958. doi: 10.3390/su8090958
[19]	国家海洋局. 中国海洋统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社,2005-2014.
	[State Oceanic Administration.China marine statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Ocean Press,2005-2014.]
[20]	国家统计局.中国环境统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2005-2014.
	[National Bureau of the People’s Republic of China.China statistical yearbook of environment. Beijing: China Statistics Press,2005-2014.]
[21]	国家统计局能源统计司.中国能源统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2005-2014.
	[Department of Energy Statistics, National Bureau of the People’s Republic of China.China energy statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press,2005-2014.]

	指标层	熵值权重
压力P	海洋捕捞量	0.13
	海盐产量	0.19
	海洋货物吞吐量	0.11
	海洋旅客吞吐量	0.18
	海水养殖面积	0.18
	工业废水直排入海量	0.22
状态S	人均海洋产业产值	0.14
	海洋经济密度	0.32
	海洋第三产业比率	0.08
	海洋产业产值增长率	0.07
	海洋生产总值占GDP比率	0.12
	海洋比较劳动生产率	0.11
	水体质量	0.09
	CO₂排放量	0.07
影响I	海洋供给服务价值	0.22
	环境调节服务价值	0.32
	人文社会服务价值	0.27
	海洋支持服务价值	0.20
响应R	海洋产业变化系数	0.14
	海滨旅游国际外汇收入	0.22
	环境保护投资占GDP比重	0.14
	环境保护人力投入	0.13
	海洋保护区面积	0.27
	废水处理达标率	0.11

		2005年	2007年	2009年	2011年	2013年			2005年	2007年	2009年	2011年	2013年
天津	生态水平	0.06	0.06	0.06	0.11	0.10	福建	生态水平	0.42	0.41	0.41	0.44	0.45
	经济水平	0.04	0.05	0.05	0.05	0.06		经济水平	0.28	0.24	0.32	0.42	0.29
	环境容量	0.50	0.45	0.57	0.63	0.62		环境容量	0.38	0.42	0.49	0.42	0.47
河北	生态水平	0.08	0.11	0.14	0.15	0.15	山东	生态水平	0.43	0.48	0.52	0.61	0.64
	经济水平	0.09	0.09	0.11	0.13	0.13		经济水平	0.38	0.46	0.50	0.54	0.54
	环境容量	0.34	0.36	0.43	0.41	0.41		环境容量	0.39	0.40	0.42	0.44	0.47
辽宁	生态水平	0.34	0.35	0.39	0.42	0.44	广东	生态水平	0.70	0.73	0.77	0.87	0.90
	经济水平	0.28	0.25	0.32	0.35	0.39		经济水平	0.26	0.30	0.29	0.34	0.39
	环境容量	0.31	0.33	0.44	0.39	0.39		环境容量	0.46	0.50	0.60	0.81	0.65
上海	生态水平	0.15	0.16	0.17	0.29	0.29	广西	生态水平	0.16	0.18	0.20	0.20	0.20
	经济水平	0.15	0.08	0.06	0.08	0.09		经济水平	0.05	0.05	0.05	0.05	0.05
	环境容量	0.59	0.83	0.86	0.85	0.93		环境容量	0.24	0.29	0.42	0.30	0.32
江苏	生态水平	0.23	0.25	0.28	0.34	0.37	海南	生态水平	0.11	0.10	0.11	0.11	0.12
	经济水平	0.07	0.06	0.07	0.08	0.08		经济水平	0.08	0.10	0.11	0.13	0.14
	环境容量	0.36	0.42	0.51	0.40	0.44		环境容量	0.35	0.47	0.47	0.43	0.44
浙江	生态水平	0.70	0.71	0.74	0.83	0.86
	经济水平	0.30	0.32	0.39	0.29	0.29
	环境容量	0.35	0.31	0.46	0.39	0.44