耦合生态服务的区域生态安全格局研究框架

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.03.005

地理科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 361-367.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.03.005

耦合生态服务的区域生态安全格局研究框架

彭保发¹(), 郑俞¹, 刘宇^1,²

1.湖南文理学院洞庭湖生态经济区建设与发展湖南省协同创新中心,湖南常德 415000
2.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所/中国科学院生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101

收稿日期:2017-04-09 修回日期:2017-10-18 出版日期:2018-03-21 发布日期:2018-03-21
作者简介:
作者简介：彭保发（1962-）,男,湖南桃源人,教授,主要从事区域土地承载力、生态服务与生态安全研究。E-mail: pengbaofa@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目（414711114）、洞庭湖生态经济区建设与发展湖南省协同创新中心项目资助

Coupling Ecosystem Services and Regional Ecological Security Pattern

Baofa Peng¹(), Yu Zheng¹, Yu Liu^1,²

1. Hunan Province Cooperative Innovation Center for The Construction & Development of Dongting Lake Ecological Economic Zone,Hunan University of Art and Sciences,Changde 415000, Hunan,China;
2. Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences,100101 Beijing, China

Received:2017-04-09 Revised:2017-10-18 Online:2018-03-21 Published:2018-03-21
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (414711114);Fund of Hunan Province Cooperative Innovation Center for the Construction & Development of Dongting Lake Ecological Economic Zone.

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在深入阐明生态系统服务与区域生态安全格局之间内在联系的基础上,根据人类社会与生态系统之间以生态服务流为纽带形成的反馈机制,提出基于驱动（Driver）-压力（Pressure）-状态（State）-影响（Impact）-响应（Response）区域生态安全格局研究框架。该框架有助于深入理解区域生态安全维持和区域生态安全问题形成的机制,拓展区域生态安全评估、生态安全格局维持和提升的视野。当前,耦合生态服务的区域生态安全格局研究有3个关键的前沿议题：① 生态服务需求和生态服务供给的空间耦合及其对人类活动的响应;② 维持生态系统服务流网络结构完整性和稳定性的人类活动阈值;③ 耦合人类生态服务供给和需求的区域生态安全评估模型。

关键词: 生态系统服务, 生态系统服务流, 区域生态安全格局, DPSIR框架

Abstract:

Ecosystem services (ESs) are material and spiritual benefits obtained from the composition and functions, and processes occurred in ecosystems. They are fundamental and critical for survival and development of human society. They not only reflect the status of ecological security comprehensively from the aspect of ecosystem by ecosystem services supply, but also provide an avenue for human society to perceive the changes of ecosystem composition and function through changes in ecosystem flows. ES is inherently coupling with regional ecological security. A sustainable supply and delivery of ESs indicates a well regional ecological security. Therefore, ES concept and ES evaluation are essential in assessing regional ecological security status. However, theories and methodology related to integrating ES approach into ecological security assessment are insufficient. It is necessary to give a systematic exploring of methodology for combining ES with regional ecological security pattern. In this study, the inherent connection between ES and regional ecological security pattern is revealed. According to the feedback mechanism between the ecosystem capacity on ecosystem services provision and human societies through ES flow, a Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response framework (DPSIR) is outlined. In this framework, ES demand of human society is the driven force; Intensity of ES extraction indicates the pressures; Ecosystem composition and function, and integrality and stability of ES delivery network are defined as state variables; ES supply capacity and capacity to deliver ES to human society are indicators for impact. ES flow is considered as a media to feedback information on ecosystem to human society. This framework is provide a map to study regional ecological security pattern, and may broaden the view of regional ecological security assessment and the regulation of ecosystem pattern for ecological security maintenance and improvement. In the end, some critical research issues that are relevant to the DPSIR framework are given. At present, 3 key issues need to be untangled for the DPSIR framework provided here: 1) response of the spatial coupling between ES demands and ES supply capacity; 2) threshold of human activity intensity for maintaining the integrity and stability of ES flow network; 3) models for regional ecological security pattern assessment and coupling ES demands and ES supply.

Key words: ecosystem services, ecosystem service flow, regional ecological security pattern, DPSIR framework

中图分类号:

X171

彭保发, 郑俞, 刘宇. 耦合生态服务的区域生态安全格局研究框架[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(3): 361-367.

Baofa Peng, Yu Zheng, Yu Liu. Coupling Ecosystem Services and Regional Ecological Security Pattern[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2018, 38(3): 361-367.

图/表 4

参考文献 39

[1]	彭少麟, 郝艳茹, 陆宏芳, 等. 生态安全的涵义与尺度[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 43(6): 27-31. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0529-6579.2004.06.006
	[Peng Shaolin, Hao Yanru, Lu Hongfang et al. The meaning and scales of ecological security. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 2004, 43(6): 27-31.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0529-6579.2004.06.006
[2]	王根绪, 程国栋, 钱鞠. 生态安全评价研究中的若干问题[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14(9): 1551-1556.
	[Wang Genxu, Cheng Guodong, Qian Ju.Several problems in ecological security assessment research. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003, 14(9): 1551-1556.]
[3]	傅伯杰, 周国逸, 白永飞, 等. 中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全[J]. 地球科学进展, 2009, 24(6): 571-576.
	[Fu Bojie, Zhou Guoyi, Bai Yongfei et al. The main terrestrial ecosystem services and ecological security in China. Advances in Earth Science, 24(6): 571-576.]
[4]	傅伯杰, 吕一河, 高光耀. 中国主要陆地生态系统服务与生态安全研究的重要进展[J]. 自然杂志, 2012, 34(5): 261-272. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9608.2012.05.003
	[Fu Bojie, Lyu Yihe, Gao Guangyao.Major research progresses on the ecosystem service and ecological safety of main terrestrial ecosystems in China. Chinese Journal of Nature, 2012,34(5):261-272.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9608.2012.05.003
[5]	王晓峰, 吕一河, 傅伯杰. 生态系统服务与生态安全[J]. 自然杂志, 2012, 34(5): 273-298. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9608.2012.05.004
	[Wang Xiaofeng, Lyu Yihe, Fu Bojie.Ecosystem services and ecological security. Chinese Journal of Nature, 34(5):273-298.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9608.2012.05.004
[6]	Costanza R, D’Arge R, Groot Rd et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
[7]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis report [M].Washington D C: Island Press,2005.
[8]	欧阳志云, 郑华. 生态系统服务的生态学机制研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(11): 6183-6188.
	[Ouyang Zhiyun, Zheng Hua.Ecological mechanisms of ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(11):6183-6188.]
[9]	Bagstad K J, Johnson G W, Voigt B et al. Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: Acomprehensive approach to quantifying actual services[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013, 4: 117-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012
[10]	Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts T H et al. Natural capital: Theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
[11]	Kandziora M, Benjamin Burkhard, Felix Müller.Mapping provisioning ecosystem services at the local scale using data of varying spatial and temporal resolution[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013, 4: 47-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.001
[12]	Daily G C, Polasky S, Goldstein J et al. Ecosystem services in decision making: Time to deliver[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2009, 7: 21-28. doi: 10.1890/080025
[13]	Farley J, Costanza R.Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69: 2060-2068. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.010
[14]	Bateman I J, Harwood A R, Mace G M et al. Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: Land use in the United Kingdom[J]. Science, 2013, 341: 45-50. doi: 10.1126/science.1234379
[15]	王如松, 欧阳志云. 对我国生态安全的若干科学思考[J]. 科技与社会, 2007, 22(3): 223-229. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3045.2007.03.008
	[Wang Rusong, Ouyang Zhiyun.Some consider ations with scientific views on ecological security in China S&T and Society, 22(3):223-229.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3045.2007.03.008
[16]	彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序,等. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 407-419.
	[Peng Jian, Zhao Huijuan, Li Yanxu et al. Research progress and prospect on regional ecological security pattern construction. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(3): 407-419.]
[17]	马克明, 傅伯杰, 黎晓亚, 等. 区域生态安全格局:概念与理论基础. 生态学报[J], 2004, 24(4): 761-768.
	[Ma Keming, Fu Bojie, Li Xiaoya et al. The regional pattern for ecological security (RPES): The concept and theoretical basis. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004,24(4):761-768.]
[18]	吴健生, 岳新欣, 秦维. 基于生态系统服务价值重构的生态安全格局构建——以重庆两江新区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 429-440. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201703003
	[Wu Jiansheng, Yue Xinxin, Qin Wei.The establishment of ecological security patterns based on the redistribution of ecosystem service value: A case study in the Liangjiang New Area. ChongqingGeographical Research, 2017, 36(3): 429-440.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201703003
[19]	左伟, 王桥, 王文杰,等. 区域生态安全评价指标与标准研究[J]. 地理学与国土研究, 2002, 18(1): 67-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0504.2002.01.017
	[Zuo Wei, Wang Qiao, Wang Wenjie et al. Study on regional ecological security assessment index and standard. Geography and Territorial Researh, 2002,18(1):67-71.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0504.2002.01.017
[20]	张百平, 姚永慧, 朱运海, 等. 区域生态安全研究的科学基础与初步框架[J]. 地理科学进展, 2005, 24(6): 1-7. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2005.06.001
	[Zhang Baiping, Yao Yonghui, Zhu Yunhai et al.Scientific basis and working frame for regional ecological security research. Progress in Geography,2005, 24(6):1-7.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2005.06.001
[21]	Willemen L, Drakou E G, Dunbar M B et al. Safeguarding ecosystem services and livelihoods: Understanding the impact of conservation strategies on benefit flows to society[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013, 4: 95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.004
[22]	Aretano R, Petrosillo I, Zaccarelli N et al. People perception of landscape change effects on ecosystem services in small mediterranean islands: A combination of subjective and objective assessments[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2013, 112: 63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.010
[23]	Bagstad K J, Johnson G W, Voigt B et al. Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: Acomprehensive approach to quantifying actual services[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013, 4: 117-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012
[24]	Fisher B, Turner R K, Morling P.Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making[J]. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68: 643-653. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014
[25]	Metzger M J, Rounsevell M D A, Acosta-Michlik L et al. The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2006, 114: 69-85.
[26]	刘纪远, 王绍强, 陈镜明,等. 1990~2000年中国土壤碳氮蓄积量与土地利用变化[J]. 地理学报, 2004, 59(4): 483-496. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2004.04.001
	[Liu Jiyuan, Wang Shaoqiang, Chen Jingming et al. Storages of soil organic carbon and nitrogen and land use changes in China: 1990-2000. Acta Geographica Sinica,2004, 59(4):483-496.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2004.04.001
[27]	Polasky S, Nelson E, Pennington D et al. The impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: A case study in the state of Minnesota[J]. Environ Resource Econ, 2011, 48: 219-242. doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9407-0
[28]	Zheng H, Robinson B E, Liang Y C et al. Benefits, costs, and livelihood implications of a regional payment for ecosystem service program[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013, 110: 1-6. doi: 10.1073/iti0113110
[29]	Crossman N D, Burkhard B, Nedkov S et al. A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013, 4: 4-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001
[30]	Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R et al. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008, 105: 9495-9500. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707823105 pmid: 18621701
[31]	Goldenberg R, Kalantari Z, Cvetkovic Vet al. Distinction, quantification and mapping of potential and realized supply-demand of flow-dependent ecosystem services[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 593-594: 599-609. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.130 pmid: 28363174
[32]	de Groot R S, Alkemade R, Braat Let al. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2010, 7: 260-272. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
[33]	Galler C, Albert C, von Haaren C. From regional environmental planning to implementation: Paths and challenges of integrating ecosystem services[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2016, 18: 118-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.02.031
[34]	谢高地, 鲁春霞, 肖玉, 等. 青藏高原高寒草地生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 山地学报, 2003, 21(1): 50-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2786.2003.01.007
	[Xie Gaodi, Lu Chunxia, Xiao Yu et al.The economic evaluation of grassland ecosystem services in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Journal of Mountain Science, 2003, 21(1):50-55.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2786.2003.01.007
[35]	Mitchell M G E, Suarez-Castro A F, Martinez-Harms Met al. Reframing landscape fragmentation’s effects on ecosystem services[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2015, 30: 190-198. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.01.011 pmid: 25716547
[36]	Johnson G W, Bagstad K J, Snapp R R et al. Service path attribution networks (spans): A network flow approach to ecosystem service assessment[J]. International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems, 2012, 3: 54-71. doi: 10.4018/jaeis.2012070104
[37]	Villamagna A M, Angermeier P L, Bennett E M.Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: A conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2013, 15: 114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.07.004
[38]	陈星. 区域生态安全空间格局评价模型的研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2008, 30: 21-28. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2008.01.004
	[Chen Xin.Spatial pattern modelling of ecological security assessment in a region. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30: 21-28.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2008.01.004
[39]	关文彬, 谢春华, 马克明, 等. 景观生态恢复与重建是区域生态安全格局构建的关键途径[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23: 64-73.
	[Guan Wenbin, Xie Chunhua, Ma Keming.A vital method for constructing regional ecological security pattern: landscape ecological restoration and rehabil itation. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23(1): 64-73.]

耦合生态服务的区域生态安全格局研究框架

Coupling Ecosystem Services and Regional Ecological Security Pattern

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 39

相关文章 14

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

指标类别	指标
驱动	生态服务需求强度生态服务需求与供给的空间耦合关系
压力	生态服务获取强度
状态	区域生态系统服务功能区域生态服务流网络结构完整性和稳定性
影响	生态服务供给能力生态服务传输能力
响应	生态服务流量

[1]	仲俊涛, 王蓓, 米文宝, 樊新刚, 杨美玲, 杨显明. 基于InVEST模型的宁夏盐池县禁牧草地生态补偿标准空间识别[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(6): 1019-1028.
[2]	王万同, 孙汀, 王金霞, 付强, 安传艳. 基于多源遥感数据的区域生态系统服务价值年际动态监测——以中原城市群为例[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(4): 680-687.
[3]	史恒通, 睢党臣, 吴海霞, 赵敏娟. 公众对黑河流域生态系统服务消费偏好及支付意愿研究——基于选择实验法的实证分析[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(2): 342-350.
[4]	丁振民, 姚顺波. 生态系统服务弹性敏感性系数的合理性与决策属性探讨[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(10): 1672-1679.
[5]	唐玉芝, 邵全琴, 曹巍, 杨帆, 刘璐璐, 吴丹, 周书贵. 基于物质量评估的贵州南部地区生态系统服务及其县域差异比较[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(1): 122-134.
[6]	吴健生, 毛家颖, 林倩, 李嘉诚. 基于生境质量的城市增长边界研究——以长三角地区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(1): 28-36.
[7]	李晓炜, 侯西勇, 邸向红, 苏红帆. 从生态系统服务角度探究土地利用变化引起的生态失衡——以莱州湾海岸带为例[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(8): 1197-1204.
[8]	郑德凤, 臧正, 赵良仕, 孙才志. 中国省际资源环境成本及生态负荷强度的时空演变分析[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(6): 672-680.
[9]	黄润, 王升堂, 倪建华, 孙贤斌, 王笑梅. 皖西大别山五大水库生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(10): 1270-1274.
[10]	胡喜生, 洪伟, 吴承祯. 福州市土地生态系统服务与城市化耦合度分析[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(10): 1216-1223.
[11]	李冰, 毕军, 田颖. 太湖流域重污染区土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(4): 471-476.
[12]	王小丹, 钟祥浩, 刘淑珍, 高攀, 杨莉. 西藏高原生态功能区划研究[J]. 地理科学, 2009, 29(5): 715-720.
[13]	王娟, 崔保山, 卢远. 基于生态系统服务价值核算的土地利用规划战略环境评价[J]. 地理科学, 2007, 27(4): 549-554.
[14]	于书霞, 尚金城, 郭怀成. 基于生态价值核算的土地利用政策环境评价[J]. 地理科学, 2004, 24(6): 727-732.