基于恐袭数据的“一带一路”沿线国家安全态势及时空演变分析

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.07.001

地理科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (7): 1037-1044.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.07.001

• • 下一篇

基于恐袭数据的“一带一路”沿线国家安全态势及时空演变分析

韩增林,王雪,彭飞(),刘天宝

辽宁师范大学海洋经济与可持续发展研究中心,辽宁大连 116029

收稿日期:2018-10-12 修回日期:2018-12-05 出版日期:2019-07-10 发布日期:2019-07-10
通讯作者: 彭飞 E-mail:pfly324@163.com
作者简介:韩增林（1956-）,男,山东商河人,教授,博士,博导,主要从事区域发展规划和海洋经济地理等研究。E-mail: hzl@lnnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41601114);教育部人文社会科学项目(16YJC790080);辽宁省社会科学基金项目(L17CJL001);辽宁省教育厅项目资助(JZ201783606)

Security Situation and Spatio-temporal Evolution Along Belt and Road Based on Terrorist Attack Data

Han Zenglin,Wang Xue,Peng Fei(),Liu Tianbao

Center for Studies of Marine Economy and Sustainable Development, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, Liaoning, China

Received:2018-10-12 Revised:2018-12-05 Online:2019-07-10 Published:2019-07-10
Contact: Peng Fei E-mail:pfly324@163.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41601114);Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Sciences(16YJC790080);Liaoning Provincial Social Science Fund Youth Project(L17CJL001);Liaoning Provincial Department of Education Project(JZ201783606)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

依据全球恐怖主义数据库,选取恐怖袭击事件总起数、恐怖袭击死亡人数、恐怖袭击受伤人数、恐怖袭击财产损失程度4项指标构建国家安全态势评价指标体系,运用标准差椭圆和核密度估计法对1970~2017年“一带一路”沿线国家安全态势时空演化特征进行分析。研究表明：① 在时间上,从1970~2017年“一带一路”沿线国家安全态势日益严峻,阶段性特征显著,共经历了“兴起-活跃-回落”3个阶段;② 在空间上,国家安全态势标准差椭圆向北偏西方向移动,重心转移路径为西亚北非地区-南亚地区-西亚北非地区;“9·11”事件发生前后空间特征呈现由三大“恐怖主义活跃区域”和1个“U型恐怖主义潜伏圈”向两大“动荡核心圈”和3个“动荡次中心”的转化。

关键词: 一带一路, 国家安全态势分析, 恐怖主义

Abstract:

The national safety evaluation, risk assessment and forecasting of countries along the “Belt and Road” initiative are the foundation and prerequisite for the successful implementation of the “National Initiative” and have become the key issues in the study of political geography. Based on the Global Terrorism Database, an evaluation system of the national security situation including the number of terrorist attacks, the number of deaths, the number of terrorist injuries and degree of property losses in terrorist attacks, was developed. Employing Standard Deviation Ellipse and Nuclear Density Estimation method approach to measure the spatio-temporal characteristics of the national security situation. The results show that: 1) From the analysis of time evolution, the national security situation along the “Belt and Road” became increasing seriously from 1970 to 2017, with significant phase characteristics and experienced 3 stages of “rising-active-falling”; 2) From the perspective of spatial analysis, standard deviation ellipse of national security situation moving northwest, the center of gravity path experienced a shift from the West Asia and North Africa, South Asia to West Asia and North Africa area; The spatial characteristics around the “9.11” incident have changed from the 3 "terrorist active areas" and "U-type terrorist latent circles" to the 2 "turbulent core areas" and 3 "turbulent centers".

Key words: Belt and Road Initiative, national security situation analysis, terrorism

中图分类号:

K901.4

韩增林,王雪,彭飞,刘天宝. 基于恐袭数据的“一带一路”沿线国家安全态势及时空演变分析[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(7): 1037-1044.

Han Zenglin,Wang Xue,Peng Fei,Liu Tianbao. Security Situation and Spatio-temporal Evolution Along Belt and Road Based on Terrorist Attack Data[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2019, 39(7): 1037-1044.

图/表 5

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

参考文献 32

[1]	王丰龙, 张衔春, 杨林川 , 等. 尺度理论视角下的“一带一路”战略解读[J]. 地理科学, 2016,36(4):502-511. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.04.003
	[ Wang Fenglong, Zhang Xianchun , Yang Linchuan et al.Interpretation of the "One Belt, One Road" strategy from the perspective of scale theory. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016,36(4):502-511.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.04.003
[2]	宋长青, 葛岳静, 刘云刚 , 等. 从地缘关系视角解析“一带一路”的行动路径[J]. 地理研究, 2018,37(1):3-19.
	[ Song Changqing, Ge Yuejing , Liu Yungang et al.Undertaking research on Belt and Road Initiative from the geo-relation perspective. Geographical Research, 2018,37(1):3-19.]
[3]	邹磊 . 中国“一带一路”战略的政治经济学[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2015: 306.
	[ Zou Lei. Political economy of China's "Belt and Road" strategy.Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2015.]
[4]	Bruce Hoffman. Inside terrorism[M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 2006.
[5]	Peter R Neumann , M L R Smith.Strategic terrorism:The framework and its fallacies[J]. The Journal of Strategic Studies, 2005,28(4):577.
[6]	Hu L. Global counter-terrorism strategy[M]. Beijing: Encyclopedia of China Publishing House, 2011.
[7]	Henderson. Global terrorism:The complete reference guide[M]. New York:Checkmark Books An Imprint of Facts on File Inc, 2001.
[8]	Ian O . Lesser.Countering the new terrorism[M]. Chicago: RAND Corporation, 2002.
[9]	Enders W , T Sandier,K Gaibulloev.Domestic versus transnational terrorism:Data,decomposition,and dynamics[J]. Journal of Peace Research, 2011,48(3):319-337.
[10]	周骥, 李丽娟, 陆惠龙 , 等. 浅议网络恐怖主义现状、发展趋势及对策[J]. 武警学院学报, 2018,34(10):78-83.
	[ Zhou Ji, Li Lijuan , Lu Huilong et al. Discussion on cyberterrorism’s present situation,development trend and countermeasures. Journal of the Armed Police Academy, 2018,34(10):78-83.]
[11]	佘硕, 刘旭 . 网络恐怖主义新动向及其治理分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2018,37(2):37-44.
	[ She Shuo, Liu Xu . New form of cyberterrorism and its governance. Journal of Intelligence, 2018,37(2):37-44.]
[12]	Yacov Y Haimes . Roadmap for modeling risks of terrorism to the homeland[J]. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2002,8(2):34-41.
[13]	Carley K . Destabilizing of covert networks[J]. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 2006,12:51-66.
[14]	Pedrycz W , S C Chen,S H Rubin et al.Risk evaluation through decision-support architectures in threat assessment and countering terrorism[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2009,12:621-628.
[15]	王利文 . 东南亚边境安全与地区恐怖主义[J].南洋问题研究, 2017(4):23-34.
	[ Wang Liwen . Border security and regional terrorism in southeast asia.Southeast Asian Affairs, 2017(4):23-34.]
[16]	宫玉涛 . 南亚地区恐怖主义的新态势、威胁与对策[J].南亚研究季刊, 2017(4):9-15.
	[ Gong Yutao . Terrorism in south asia: Emerging dynamics,threats and countermeasures.South Asian Studies Quarterly, 2017(4):9-15.]
[17]	张屹 . 从东南亚恐怖主义现状解析“东突”南线转向[J]. 政法学刊, 2017,34(1):121-128.
	[ Zhang Yi . On south line invasion of ETO from the status quo analysis of south-east asian terrorism. Tournal of Poltical Science and Law, 2017,34(1):121-128.]
[18]	Audrey Kurth Cronin, James M . Ludes.Attacking terrorism:Elements of a grand strategy[J]. Journal of Peace Research, 2005,42(2):238-239.
[19]	Abdel Bari Atwan. The secret history of Al Qaeda[M]. California: University of California Press, 2008.
[20]	罗刚.反恐对策: 美国经验与中国选择[J].政法论丛, 2014(5):89-96.
	[ Luo Gang . Anti-terrorism strategy:American experiences and Chinese choice. Zheng Fa Lun Cong, 2014(5):89-96.]
[21]	王君祥 . 《东盟反恐公约》——区域合作反恐法律机制及评析[J].东南亚纵横, 2009(7):3-7.
	[ Wang Junxiang . ASEAN convention on counter-terrorism—Regional anti-terrorism cooperation regime and assessment. Around Southeast Asia, 2009(7):3-7.]
[22]	尹生 . 中国反恐法制的现状、问题与对策研究[J].当代法学, 2008(3):12-19.
	[ Yin Sheng . A study on China's anti-terrorism legal mechanism. Contemporary Law Review, 2008(3):12-19.]
[23]	杨伟明, 杜邈 . 外国反恐怖工作体制研究[J].中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版), 2008(2):9-19.
	[ Yang Weiming, Du Miao . Research on foreign anti-terrorist work system. Journal of Chinese People’s Public Security University(Social Sciences Edition), 2008(2):9-19.]
[24]	梁怀新 . “一带一路”背景下中国-东盟非传统安全合作研究[J].学术探索, 2018(6):47-52.
	[ Liang Huaixin . Research on China- ASEAN non-traditional security cooperation under the "the Belt and Rad" Initiative. Academic Exploration, 2018(6):47-52.]
[25]	陈胜, 李云翔 . 试论国际反恐合作未来发展视域下中国“一带一路”战略[J].净月学刊, 2017(2):11-17.
	[ Chen Sheng, Li Yunxiang . The Belt and Road strategy in the prospect of international counter-terrorism co-operation. Jingyue Journal, 2017(2):11-17.]
[26]	刘双瑜, 吴绍忠 . 浅析中国与巴基斯坦开展反恐合作的缘由及实现路径[J]. 贵州警官职业学院学报, 2016,28(6):101-106.
	[ Liu Shuangyu, Wu Shaozhong . Reasons and achieving paths of China's cooperation with Pakistan on anti-terrorism. Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College, 2016,28(6):101-106.]
[27]	国家信息中心.“一带一路”贸易合作大数据报告( 2017) [ R]. 北京:国家信息中心, 2017.
	[ National Information Center.Big data report on trade cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative ( 2017) . Beijing:National Information Center, 2017.]
[28]	经济与和平研究所. 全球恐怖主义指数报告[R].悉尼:经济与和平研究所,2015- 2017.
	[ Institute of Economics and Peace. Global terrorism index 2014-2017. Sydney: Institute of Economics and Peace,2014- 2017.]
[29]	李国辉 . 全球恐怖袭击时空演变及风险分析研究[D]. 北京:中国科学技术大学, 2014.
	[ Li Guohui . Spatial and temporal evolution and risk analysis of global terrorist attack. Beijing:University of Science and Technology of China, 2014.]
[30]	赵媛, 杨足膺, 郝丽莎 , 等. 中国石油资源流动源-汇系统空间格局特征[J]. 地理学报, 2012,67(4):45-46.
	[ Zhao Yuan, Yang Zuying , Hao Lisha et al.The evolution of spatial displacement pattern of China's crude oil flow source-sink system. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012,67(4):45-46.]
[31]	赵敏燕, 董锁成, 王喆 , 等. “一带一路”沿线国家安全形势评估及对策[J].中国科学院院刊, 2016(6):689-696.
	[ Zhao Minyan, Dong Suocheng , Wang Zhe et al.Assessment of countries' security situation along the Belt and Road and countermeasures.Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2016(6):689-696.]
[32]	张家栋 . 世界恐怖主义的主要特征与发展趋势[J].国际观察, 2011(5):8-15.
	[ Zhang Jiadong . The main characteristics and development trend of world terrorism.International Review, 2011(5):8-15.]

总体层A	指标层B	熵值法权重	AHP 权重	组合权重
国家安全态势风险指数A	恐怖袭击事件总起数B1	0.254	0.154	0.212
	恐怖袭击死亡人数B2	0.306	0.461	0.403
	恐怖袭击受伤人数B3	0.297	0.077	0.162
	恐怖主义财产损失程度B4	0.143	0.308	0.223

基于恐袭数据的“一带一路”沿线国家安全态势及时空演变分析

Security Situation and Spatio-temporal Evolution Along Belt and Road Based on Terrorist Attack Data

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 32

相关文章 10

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王松茂, 褚玉静, 郭安禧, 郭英之. “一带一路”沿线重点省份旅游经济高质量发展研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(9): 1505-1512.
[2]	徐文明, 朱显平. “一带一路”倡议下东北地区粮食产业转型升级路径[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(12): 2046-2054.
[3]	孟广文, 赵钏, 周俊, 王艳红, 王淑芳, 杜明明. 泰中罗勇工业园“园中园”模式与效益评价[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(11): 1803-1811.
[4]	陆梦秋, 陈娱. “一带一路”倡议下中欧集装箱潜在铁路运输流的空间格局模拟[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(9): 1416-1424.
[5]	侯纯光, 杜德斌, 段德忠, 桂钦昌, 焦美琪. “一带一路”沿线国家或地区人才流动网络结构演化[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(11): 1711-1718.
[6]	孟广文, 王春智, 杜明明, 王继光, 赵钏, 鲁笑男, 王红梅. 尼日利亚奥贡广东自贸区发展历程与产业聚集研究[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(5): 727-736.
[7]	司增绰, 周坤, 仇方道, 邵军. 中国对“一带一路”沿线国家出口增长的边际特征时空变化[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(11): 1777-1787.
[8]	陆大道. 当代中国的全球观念与全球战略[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(4): 483-490.
[9]	王丰龙, 张衔春, 杨林川, 洪世键. 尺度理论视角下的“一带一路”战略解读[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(4): 502-511.
[10]	邹嘉龄, 刘卫东. 2001~2013年中国与“一带一路”沿线国家贸易网络分析[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(11): 1629-1636.