中国东北地区地缘关系演化过程及区域效应

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.08.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

梳理相关文献,深入分析探讨20世纪以来东北地区地缘关系的演化过程,刻画地缘关系变化对区域发展的影响。研究发现:20世纪10~40年代,东北地区地缘关系呈现“半畸形”开放的状态,整个地区长期处于军阀战乱与日本侵略阶段;这一时期,东北地区迎来移民高峰,农业经济、民族工业快速发展,但同时境内日本经济肆意扩张,大量资源与财富被掠夺。新中国成立以来,地缘关系由50、60年代的依赖型转向80年代以后的多元和平发展;受其及政策等其他因素影响,地区内工业由蓬勃发展到缓慢波动前行。如今,东北地区地缘政治关系仍十分复杂,但地缘经济合作前景开阔;未来应大力推动东北亚国家及次区域间安全与经济合作,同时提高东北地区内生发展动力及对外开放水平。

关键词: 中国东北地区, 东北亚, 地缘关系, 区域效应

Abstract:

With the progress of the Belt and Road Initiative and its construction, China's multifaceted cooperation with its neighbors has further deepened. Due to the special geographical location and unstable surrounding international environment, the geo-relations in Northeast China have always been complex and changeable, profoundly affecting the region's economic and social development. By combing the relevant historical documents, this paper analyzes the evolution process of the geo-relations in Northeast China since the 20th Century, and comprehensively depicts the influence of the geo-relations on the regional development.The main conclusions are as follows. From 1910s to 1940s, As a result of the outbreak of World War I and the establishment of the Soviet government, the alliance between Japan and Russia collapsed. The relationship between Japan and the United States hovered between competition and cooperation. Japan's colonial rule over the Northeast China changed the balance of the strategic situation of Northeast Asia. While the victory of the Anti-Fascist War and Counter-Japanese War basically broke the conspiracy of some countries to Northeast China. Overall, the geo-relations in Northeast China were semi-deformedly open, and the region was in a state of warlords chaos and Japanese colonial rule for a long time. At the same time, the Northeast China ushered in the peak of immigration, and the agricultural economy and national industry developed rapidly. However, the Japanese economy expanded willfully in the region, and a lot of resources and wealth were plundered. Since the founding of new China, Sino-Korean and Sino-Soviet relations have undergone a transition from the honeymoon period to the tortuous development period. Then the geo-relations in Northeast Asia show a relatively stable, peaceful and pluralistic trend of development, but there are still some challenges in the process of development, mainly coming from the United States and its military alliances and Korean Peninsula. Accordingly, the industrial development in the region has grown from prosperity to decline. And the region has made some progress in opening up regional cooperation towards Northeast Asia, among them, the implementation of Tumen River regional cooperation and development strategy and Belt and Road Initiative are the most representative. Nowadays, the geopolitical relationship in Northeast Asia is complicated, while the prospect of geo-economic cooperation is broad. In the future, we should vigorously promote the political and economic cooperation between Northeast Asian countries and sub regions, simultaneously improving the endogenous development power and the level of opening up to the outside world in Northeast China.

Key words: Northeast China, Northeast Asia, geo-relation, regional effect

中图分类号:

K901.4

程利莎,王士君,杨冉. 中国东北地区地缘关系演化过程及区域效应[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(8): 1284-1292.

Cheng Lisha,Wang Shijun,Yang Ran. Evolution Process and Regional Effect of Geo-relations in Northeast China[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2019, 39(8): 1284-1292.

参考文献 38

[1]	Markusen A, King D . The artistic divided: The arts' hidden contributions to regional development, Minneapolois, M N: Project on Regional and Industrial Economics, Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs[D]. Minnesota: University of Minnesota, 2003.
[2]	刘云刚 . 中国政治地理学研究展望[J]. 人文地理, 2009, 24(2): 12-16+28.
	[ Liu Yungang . A research perspective on Chinese political geography.Human Geography, 2009, 24(2): 12-16+28. ]
[3]	王士君, 陈才 . 论中国东北地缘关系及因应对策[J]. 人文地理, 2003,19(6):16-19.
	[ Wang Shijun, Chen Cai . A study on the geographical relation in Northeast China and corresponding strategies. Human Geography, 2003,19(6):16-19.]
[4]	宋长青, 葛岳静, 刘云刚 , 等. 从地缘关系视角解析“一带一路”的行动路径[J]. 地理研究, 2018,37(1):3-19.
	[ Song Changqing, Ge Yuejing, Liu Yungang et al. Undertaking research on belt and road initiative from the geo-relation perspective. Geographical Research, 2018,37(1):3-19.]
[5]	陆大道, 杜德斌 . 关于加强地缘政治地缘经济研究的思考[J]. 地理学报, 2013,68(6):723-727.
	[ Lu Dadao, Du Debin . Some thoughts on the strengthening of geopolitical and geoeconomic studies. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013,68(6):723-727.]
[6]	段进军, 陆大道 . 论大国东亚地缘经济战略与东亚地区经济合作[J]. 经济地理, 1999,19(2):23-27.
	[ Duan Jinjun, Lu Dadao . Large countries geographical economics strategies of East Asia and economic cooperation of East Asia. Economic Geography, 1999,19(2):23-27.]
[7]	王明清 . 中国东北与俄罗斯远东地缘经济关系研究[D]. 长春:东北师范大学, 2016.
	[ Wang Mingqing . A study on the geo economic relations between Northeast China and Russian Far East. Changchun: Northeast Normal University, 2016.]
[8]	司增绰, 周坤, 仇方道 , 等. 中国对“一带一路”沿线国家出口增长的边际特征时空变化[J]. 地理科学, 2018,38(11):1777-1787.
	[ Si Zengchuo, Zhou Kun, Qiu Fangdao et al. The temporal and spatial variation of margin characteristics of China’s export growth to countries along the Belt and Road. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018,38(11):1777-1787.]
[9]	孙峰华, 陆大道, 代合治 , 等. 渤海海峡跨海通道建设与中国的地缘政治战略[J]. 地理科学, 2017,37(1):1-10.
	[ Sun Fenghua, Lu Dadao, Dai Hezhi et al. The constructionof Trans-Bohai Strait Passageway and its geopolitical strategies of China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017,37(1):1-10.]
[10]	任嘉敏, 马延吉 . 东北老工业基地绿色发展评价及障碍因素分析[J]. 地理科学, 2018,38(7):1042-1050.
	[ Ren Jiamin, Ma Yanji . Green development level and the obstacle factors of old industrial base in Northeast China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018,38(7):1042-1050.]
[11]	于婷婷, 宋玉祥, 阿荣 , 等. 东北地区人口结构与经济发展耦合关系研究[J]. 地理科学, 2018,38(1):114-121.
	[ Yu Tingting, Song Yuxiang, A Rong et al. The coupling relationship between population structure and economic development in Northeast China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018,38(1):114-121.]
[12]	祁怀高, 李开盛, 潘亚玲 , 等. 未来十年东北亚地缘政治结构的变化及其影响[J]. 世界经济与政治, 2016( 8): 130-156+160.
	[ Qi Huaigao, Li Kaisheng, Pan Yaling et al. Three dimensional changes and the implications for the next 10-year Northeast Asian geopolitical structure. World Economics and Politics, 2016( 8): 130-156+160. ]
[13]	陈才, 王莲琴 . 世纪之交东北亚地缘政治经济格局的新变化与我国东北沿边开放的新形势[J]. 世界地理研究, 1998(2):36-42.
	[ Chen Cai, Wang Lianqin . Impact of the changing situation of geo-political and geo-economic structures of Northeast Asia & development of the out-oriented economy of border areas in Northeast China. World Regional Studies, 1998(2):36-42.]
[14]	王俊生 . 东北亚多边安全机制: 进展与出路[J]. 世界经济与政治, 2012( 12): 53-75+157-158.
	[ Wang Junsheng . Multilateral security mechanism in Northeast Asia: Progress and pathway. World Economics and Politics, 2012( 12): 53-75+157-158. ]
[15]	刘江永 . 朝鲜半岛局势与东北亚可持续安全[J]. 东北亚论坛, 2016, 25(3): 3-14+127.
	[ Liu Jiangyong . Situation of the Korean Peninsula and sustainable security of Northeast Asia. Northeast Asia Forum, 2016, 25(3): 3-14+127. ]
[16]	张序强, 张桂兰, 董雪旺 . 东北亚三地区经济技术合作研究[J]. 经济地理, 2001, 21(3): 275-278+282.
	[ Zhang Xuqiang, Zhang Guilan, Dong Xuewang . A study on economy technology cooperation among three regions in Northeast Asia. Economic Geography, 2001, 21(3): 275-278+282. ]
[17]	黄平 . 东北亚地缘政治特点与中韩经贸合作趋势[J]. 人文地理, 1997,13(1):33-38.
	[ Huang Ping . The geopolitical gharacteristics of the Northeast Asia and the trend of Sino-south Korean Economic cooperation. Human Geography, 1997,13(1):33-38.]
[18]	于国政 . 21世纪初东北亚经济合作发展趋势分析[J]. 当代亚太, 2002(8):24-28.
	[ Yu Guozheng . An analysis of the trend of economic cooperation in Northeast Asia in the early 21st century. Journal of Contemporary Asia-Pacific Studies, 2002(8):24-28.]
[19]	李天籽, 王迪 . 东北亚区域能源互联网建设研究[J]. 东北亚论坛, 2016, 25(6): 58-68+126.
	[ Li Tianzi, Wang Di . Research on the construction of energy internet in Northeast Asia. Northeast Asia Forum, 2016, 25(6): 58-68+126. ]
[20]	富景筠 . 东北亚天然气格局的演变逻辑——市场结构与权力结构的分析[J]. 东北亚论坛, 2015, 24(4): 60-70+128.
	[ Fu Jingyun . The evolution logic of natural gas order in Northeast Asia: Analysis of market structure and power structure. Northeast Asia Forum, 2015, 24(4): 60-70+128. ]
[21]	郭锐 . 国际机制视角下的东北亚环境合作[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011,21(8):43-48.
	[ Guo Rui . Environmental cooperation in Northeast Asia from the angle of international regimes.China Population, Resources and Environment, 2011,21(8):43-48.]
[22]	陈才, 王士君 . 东北经济区地缘战略研究[J]. 东北亚论坛, 2001, 10(3): 3-7+96.
	[ Chen Cai, Wang Shijun . A study on the geopolitical strategy of Northeast Economical Zone. Northeast Asia Forum, 2001, 10(3): 3-7+96. ]
[23]	袁树人, 宋德清, 黄岩君 . 图们江发展三角区的地缘经济与资源赋予特点[J]. 世界地理研究, 1995(1):9-17.
	[ Yuan Shuren, Song Deqing, Huang Yanjun , Geo-economics and resource vesting characteristics of Tumen River Development Triangle. World Regional Studies, 1995(1):9-17.]
[24]	方创琳 . “一带一路”背景下中国图们江区域城市国际经济合作战略与格局[J]. 东北亚经济研究, 2017,1(1):5-14.
	[ Fang Chuanglin . The strategy and pattern of international economic cooperation in Tumen River Area of China under the background of “the Belt and Road”. Northeast Asia Economic Research, 2017,1(1):5-14.]
[25]	李正, 武友德, 陈才 , 等. 转化博弈视域下图们江合作通航的困局与出路研究[J]. 地理科学, 2013,33(4):393-401.
	[ Li Zheng, Wu Youde, Chen Cai et al. Transformation game perspective about the cooperation dilemma in the Tumen River's navigation and its solutions. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013,33(4):393-401.]
[26]	林军 . 中苏外交关系:1917~1927[M]. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江人民出版社, 1990: 111-112.
	[ Lin Jun. Sino- Soviet diplomatic relations: 1917-1927. Harbin: Heilongjiang People's Press, 1990: 111-112.]
[27]	张盛发 . 列强在中国东北的争夺与中东铁路所有权的历史演变[J]. 俄罗斯中亚东欧研究, 2007( 5): 64-72+96.
	[ Zhang Shengfa. . The struggle of the great powers in Northeast China and the historical evolution of the East China Road Ownership. Russian, East European & Central Asian Studies, 2007( 5): 64-72+96. ]
[28]	王玉祥 . 试论“中东路事件”与“九·一八”事变[J]. 史学月刊, 1997( 4): 66-71+79.
	[ Wang Yuxiang. . On ‘East China Road incident’ and ‘September 18th Incident’. Journal of Historical Science, 1997( 4): 66-71+79. ]
[29]	李莹, 王瑜鹭 . 九一八事变前后美、英、苏对日政策的演变及中日两国的政策取向[J]. “九一八”研究, 2016,1:81-86.
	[ Li Ying, Wang Yulu . The evolution of US, British and Soviet Policy toward Japan before and after the ‘September 18th Incident’ and the policy orientation of China and Japan. Research on September 18th Incident. 2016,1:81-86.]
[30]	潘喜廷 . 东北近代史研究[M]. 郑州: 中州古籍出版社, 1994: 116.
	[ Pan Xiting. The study of modern history in Northeast China. Zhengzhou: Zhongzhou Ancient Books Publishing House, 1994: 116.]
[31]	范立君 . 近代东北移民与社会变迁(1860~1931)[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2005.
	[ Fan Lijun . Immigration and social changes in the modern Northeast China (1860-1931). Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2005.]
[32]	衣保中, 林莎 . 论民国时期东北区域经济发展的基本态势[J]. 理论探讨, 2001(2):47-49.
	[ Yi Baozhong, Lin Sha . On the basic situation of economic development in Northeast China during the republic of China. Theoretical Investigation, 2001(2):47-49.]
[33]	常城, 崔丕 . 世界列强与东北[M]. 北京: 中国大百科全书出版社, 1995: 1-246.
	[ Chang Cheng, Cui Pi. The world powers and the Northeast China. Beijing: Encyclopedia of China Publishing House, 1995: 1-246.]
[34]	陈真 . 中国近代工业史资料(第二辑)[M]. 北京: 三联书店, 1958: 433-434.
	[ Chen Zhen . Industrial data of modern Chinese history: the second album. Beijing: Sanlian Bookstore , 1958: 433-434. ]
[35]	姜威 . 中国东北工业重振:历史镜鉴与对策探讨[J]. 东北亚经济研究, 2017,1(1):110-120.
	[ Jiang Wei . Historical mirror and countermeasure discussion of reviving northeast industry of China. Northeast Asia Economic Research, 2017,1(1):110-120.]
[36]	邢树君 . 图们江区域开发战略中的国际合作问题研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2014.
	[ Xing Shujun . Research on international cooperation in the development strategy of Tumen River Region. Changchun: Jilin University, 2014.]
[37]	刘国斌, 宋瑾泽 . “一带一路”倡议与东北地区振兴联动发展战略研究[J]. 东北亚经济研究, 2018,2(6):5-15.
	[ Liu Guobin, Song Jinze . Study on the linkage development strategy of ‘The Belt and Road’initiative and revitalization of the Northeast China. Northeast Asia Economic Research, 2018,2(6):5-15.]
[38]	姜龙范 . “一带一路”倡议视域下的危机管控与东北亚安全合作机制的构建[J]. 东北亚论坛, 2018, 27(3): 45-58+127-128.
	[ Jiang Longfan . The crisis management from the perspective of belt and road initiative and the construction of security cooperation mechanism in Northeast Asia. Northeast Asia Forum, 2018, 27(3): 45-58+127-128. ]