中文权威核心期刊学术论文价值综合评价体系的构建与实践:以地理学科为例

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.08.017

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

深入解读中国科研评价中存在的3个现象,即过度重视SCI(Science Citation Index)/SSCI(Social Sciences Citation Index)、“唯高影响因子”和“唯发表成果为王”。其中,过度重视SCI/SSCI直接或间接造成了“唯高影响因子”和“唯发表成果为王”现象的出现,成为中国学术界当前亟待解决的重要问题。“科研评价和学术地位认定政策”“学术成果影响力”和“学术影响力评价”是影响中文权威核心期刊学术论文价值认可度的3大公因子。结合对中国地理学领域为主的近千位科研人员的感知调查,构建了包括期刊影响因子、论文被引频次、论文下载量、论文社会价值以及论文创新性5个指标的新的学术论文价值综合评价模型。最后从国家、部委、学会、期刊和学者层面分别提出改革过度推崇SCI/SSCI的学术评定政策、树立科研成果服务国民经济主战场的导向;强化政策执行力与构建服务于学术本质的考核标准;发挥桥梁和纽带作用及制定和完善评价体系;提升文化自信、凸显特色化和差异化、强化市场化和增值多元化;增强母语成果自信和提升在中文权威核心期刊建立学术地位的动力等实践建议。

关键词: 科研评价, 学术论文价值, 综合评价模型, 地理学, 权威核心期刊, 中国

Abstract:

This paper conducts an in-depth and systematic analysis on the scientific research evaluation in China which is featured by the over-emphasis on SCI/SSCI publication and over-weighted focus on Impact Factor (IF) and the number of paper publication only. The highly stressed orientation of SCI/SSCI publication in scientific research evaluation has, in a direct or indirect way, brought about the prominent phenomenon of only pursuing the paper publication in academic journals with high IF for scientific researchers. All these have served as the main challenges facing China's academic society, thus urgently needed to be addressed. Therefore, this paper tries to, by conducting perception research in geography field and analyzing nearly 1 000 survey questionnaires disseminated to geography researchers, newly establish a comprehensive model to evaluate the academic value of scientific papers from the five dimensions of indicators, i.e., journal IF, paper citation frequency, paper downloads, social value of papers and innovativeness of papers, as well as identifies the three main pillar aspects for academic value recognition of papers, i.e., related policies on scientific research evaluation and academic status certification, academic achievement influencing power, and academic influencing power evaluation. The results show that the academic achievement influencing power and academic influencing power evaluation are positively correlated to the paper academic value recognition, while the related policies on scientific research evaluation and academic status certification have presented a negative correlation. Besides, the proposed evaluation model in this paper has been empirically applied and tested in selecting and awarding the Most Influential Academic Papers in Chinese geography journals in 2016 and 2018. Finally, by taking geography journals as case study, this paper aims to ease and convert the trend of only focusing on high IF SCI/SSCI publication, promote the evaluation standardization to journals in different languages and disciplines by mutual learning and bringing the gap between different sets of evaluation criteria, yet in a customized way according to the characters, contents and conditions of each discipline, thus providing valuable references to the scientific paper academic value evaluation system reform by other disciplines.

Key words: scientific research evaluation, academic value of papers, comprehensive evaluation model, Geography, authoritative core journals, China

中图分类号:

G304

朱晓华,高春东. 中文权威核心期刊学术论文价值综合评价体系的构建与实践:以地理学科为例[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(8): 1351-1360.

Zhu Xiaohua,Gao Chundong. Establishment and Application of the Comprehensive Evaluation System of Academic Value of Papers in Chinese Authoritative Core Journals: Case Study in Geography[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2019, 39(8): 1351-1360.

图/表 3

图1

表1

图2

参考文献 32

[1]	柳卸林, 赵捷 . 影响中国SCI论文数量与质量的因素分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2003(10):87-94.
	[ Liu Xielin, Zhao Jie . What determines the quality and quantity of papers in SCI. China Soft Science, 2003(10):87-94.]
[2]	Garfield E . "Science Citation Index"—A new dimension in indexing[J]. Science, 1964,144(361):649-654.
[3]	Garfield E . How ISI selects journals for coverage: Quantitative and qualitative considerations[J]. Current Contents, 1990,22(2):5-13.
[4]	Moed H F . Measuring China's research performance using the Science Citation Index[J]. Scientometrics, 2002,53(3):281-296.
[5]	Kostoff R N, Eriggs M E, Rushenberg R L et al. Assessment of science and technology literature of China and India as reflected in the SCI/SSCI[J]. Current Science, 2007,93(8):1088-1092.
[6]	朱晓华, 何书金, 王岱 , 等. SCI/SSCI期刊与中文权威核心期刊论文的学术价值评价: 基于地理工作者的感知分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016,71(4):680-692.
	[ Zhu Xiaohua, He Shujin, Wang Dai et al. Evaluation of academic value of papers in SCI/SSCI and Chinese core journals: A geographer perspective. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016,71(4):680-692.]
[7]	陆大道 . 以SCI为主导的论文挂帅扼杀了科技创造力[N/OL]. .
	[ Lu Dadao. Technology creativity was killed by the View of Papers Concerning Only, especially SCI. .]
[8]	陆大道 . 只有自主创新才能成就国际一流[N]. 中国科学报, 2018 -05-21.
	[ Lu Dadao . Only independent innovation can make the world first-class. China Science Daily, 2018 -05-21. ]
[9]	任胜利, 王宝庆, 郭志明 , 等. 应慎重使用期刊的影响因子评价科研成果[J]. 科学通报, 2000,45(2):218-222.
	[ Ren Shengli, Wang Baoqing, Guo Zhiming , et al. Use influence factors in evaluation of scientific research achievements cautiously. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2000,45(2):218-222.]
[10]	Cavalli F . What has prevented Annals of Oncology from reaching an impact factor of 6?[J]. Annals of Oncology, 1999,10(12):1403-1404.
[11]	Raisig L M . Mathematical evaluation of the scientific serial[J]. Science, 1960,131(3411):1417-1419.
[12]	van Leeuwen T N, Moed H F, Tijssen R J W et al. Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance[J]. Scientometrics, 2001,51(1):335-346.
[13]	Carpenter M P, Narin F . The adequacy of the science citation index (SCI) as an indicator of international scientific activity[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1981,32(6):430-439.
[14]	Cole J R, COLE S . Measuring the quality of sociological research: Problems in the use of the science citation index[J]. The American Sociologist, 1971,6:23-29.
[15]	Seglen P O . Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research[J]. BMJ, 1997,314(7079):497.
[16]	Rousseau R, Leuven K U, Mathematics D . The Journal impact factor,the dora declaration and the leiden manifesto:Comments and Observations. Documentation Information & Knowledge, 2016.
[17]	ASM Media Advisory. ASM no longer supports impact factors for its Journals[EB/OL]. . 2016 -07-11.
[18]	Garfield E . Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved?[J]. BMJ, 1996,313(7054):411-413.
[19]	袁曦临, 陆美, 刘利 . 基于机构知识库的国际学术论文管理模式探讨[J]. 情报资料工作, 2014(2):87-91.
	[ Yuan Xilin, Lu Mei, Liu Li . A probe into institutional repository-based international academic papers management patterm. Information and Documentation Services, 2014(2):87-91.]
[20]	范赟, 刘俊 . 中日韩科研人员创新能力与创新绩效评价比较研究[J]. 科学管理研究, 2015,33(6):117-120.
	[ Fan Yun, Liu Jun . A comparative study of China scientific research personnel innovation capability and innovation performance evaluation. Scientific Management Research, 2015,33(6):117-120.]
[21]	张春博, 丁堃, 王贤文 , 等. 使用SSCI测度中国社会科学国际产出的问题探讨[J]. 情报资料工作, 2017(3):26-32.
	[ Zhang Chunbo, Ding Kun, Wang Xianwen , et al. Discussion on the application of SSCI to measure the international output of Chinese social sciences. Information and Documentation Services, 2017(3):26-32.]
[22]	Nunnally J. Psychometric Theory ( 2nd ed)[M]. New York: McGraw Hill, 1978.
[23]	Straub D W . Validating instruments in MIS research[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1989,13(2):147.
[24]	Yanovsky V I . Citation analysis significance of scientific journals[J]. Scientometrics, 1981,3(3):223-233.
[25]	韩鹏鸣 . 期刊论文的影响力分析[J]. 情报科学, 2010,28(10):1505-1508.
	[ Han Pengming . Analysis on the academic influence force of the journal. Information Science, 2010,28(10):1505-1508.]
[26]	新华社. 习近平在哲学社会科学工作座谈会上的讲话[N/OL]. .
	[ xinhua news agency . xi jinping's speech on the conference of philosophy and social science work. .]
[27]	中国科学技术协会, 教育部, 国家新闻出版广电总局, 等. 关于准确把握科技期刊在学术评价中作用的若干意见[N/OL]. . 2015-11-03.
	[ China Association for Science and Technology, Ministry of Education, The State Administration of Press et al. Some opinions on the role of scientific and technical journals in academic evaluation. . 2015-11-03.]
[28]	范姝婕, 付晓霞 . 2008~2017年中国作者科学引文索引扩展版(SCI-E)收录论文撤稿情况分析及思考[J]. 编辑学报, 2019,31(1):51-55.
	[ Fan Shujie, Fu Xiaoxia . Analysis on China's retracted articles indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded from 2008 to 2017. Acta Editologica, 2019,31(1):51-55.]
[29]	国务院办公厅. 关于优化学术环境的指导意见[R/OL]. . 2015-11-29.
	[ General Office of the State Council . Guiding opinions of the general office of the state council on optimizing the academic environment. . 2015-11-29.]
[30]	Hicks D, Wouters P, Waltman L et al. Bibliometrics: The leiden manifesto for research metrics[J]. Nature, 2015,520(7548):429-431.
[31]	徐明徽 . 美国知名论文抄袭检测网站曝光巴西敛财SCI杂志大量刊登涉嫌造假的中国学术论文数篇论文使用同样内容造假[N/OL]. . 2016-09-23.
	[ Xu Minghui . A prominent American plagiarism website has revealed that Brazilian hedge fund SCI magazine has published a large number of allegedly fraudulent Chinese academic papers using the same content. 2016-09-23. ]
[32]	朱晓华, 何书金, 袁丽华 . 中国地理与资源期刊集群化服务平台的发展与实践[J]. 地理学报, 2017,72(5):918-941.
	[ Zhu Xiaohua, He Shujin, Yuan Lihua . Development and practice of Chinese geographical and resource journals cluster service platform. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(5):918-941.]

赋分项目	类型	赋分	备注
论文成果获国家领导人批示或被政府部门采纳	中央常委级批示	20分	1、论文获得其他社会价值认可,则视情况酌情加分 2、如果出现累计,则以最高分项为准,只计算一次,不累加 3、所有加分,都需提供原始证明材料及其复印件
	副国级与省部级批示	16分、10分
	地市、县、镇村3级机构采纳	6分、4分、2分
论文获奖加分	国家自然科学、发明、科技进步一等奖	40分、38分、35分
	国家自然科学、发明、科技进步二等奖	30分、28分、25分
	省部级特等奖（含最高奖）	20分
	省部级一等奖、二等奖、三等奖	18分、14分、12分
	市厅级特等奖、一等奖、二等奖、三等奖	12分、10分、5分、4分
论文成果被媒体报道加分	国家权威媒体新华社报道	10分
	国家级其他媒体报道	6分
	地方媒体（地市级及以下）报道	1分
被《新华文摘》全文转摘		6分
被人大复印资料全文转摘		3分
其他		酌情