地理科学

地理科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10): 1581-1591.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.10.007

• • 上一篇    下一篇

技术转移视角下中国三大城市群区域一体化发展研究

段德忠1,2, 谌颖2, 杜德斌1,2()   

  1. 1. 华东师范大学全球创新与发展研究院,上海 200062
    2. 华东师范大学城市与区域科学学院,上海 200241
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-20 修回日期:2019-01-08 出版日期:2019-10-10 发布日期:2019-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 杜德斌 E-mail:dbdu@re.ecnu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:段德忠（1989-）,男,江苏溧阳人,博士后,研究方向为世界经济地理与科技创新政策。E-mail:dzduan@geo.ecnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41901139);教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(19YJC790023);上海哲学社会科学规划青年项目(2018EJL003);上海市软科学研究领域重点课题(19692103600);上海市人民政府决策咨询研究课题(2019-GR-04)

Regional Integration Process of China’s Three Major Urban Agglomerations from the Perspective of Technology Transfer

Duan Dezhong1,2, Chen Ying2, Du Debin1,2()   

  1. 1. Institute for Global Innovation and Development, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    2. School of Urban & Regional Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China;
  • Received:2018-10-20 Revised:2019-01-08 Online:2019-10-10 Published:2019-10-10
  • Contact: Du Debin E-mail:dbdu@re.ecnu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation(41901139);MOE(Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences(19YJC790023);Philosophical and Social Science Foundation of Shanghai(2018EJL003);Soft Science Research Project of Shanghai(19692103600);Research on Decision-making Consultation of Shanghai Municipal People's Government(2019-GR-04)

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

摘要：

基于城际间的专利转让数据,从技术转移体系一体化的视角阐释中国三大城市群的区域一体化进程,得出以下结论：①在总体层面和技术供给链层面,长三角、珠三角和京津冀这三大城市群的区域一体化皆未实现,其中长三角城市群正朝着一体化方向发展,大部分城市的技术获取依赖于区内技术转移网络,珠三角城市群一体化程度次之,但朝着一体化相反方向发展,京津冀城市群一体化程度最低,大部分城市的技术获取愈发依赖于外部技术转移网络;②在技术销售链层面,仅长三角城市群实现了区域一体化,以上海为核心的一体化技术转移体系正加速形成,珠三角城市群大部分城市的技术销售愈发依赖于城市群外部,而京津冀城市群则愈发依赖于城市群内部;③三大城市群的技术流动越来越多地跨越边界,区域内技术转移网络越来越无法满足城市群的技术发展需求。

关键词: 区域一体化, 技术转移, 长三角城市群, 京津冀城市群, 珠三角城市群

Abstract:

Recently, regional integration is increasingly regarded as a tool for reaping the benefits and countering the negative impacts of globalization. Beginning with the elimination of trade barriers between countries in the same region to achieve economic integration, regional integration has gradually emphasized on promoting the economic development in developing or underdeveloped regions, and narrowing the gap of internal development within a country. Regional integration has been used by Chinese government both at the national and local level as the main policy tool to deal with the development gap within a specific region. Regardless of inter-country integration or intra-country integration, existing studies mainly explain integration in terms of trade costs, investment costs and transportation costs, few attentions have been paid to discover the regional integration from the perspective of technology flows. This paper attempts to understand the regional integration process of China's three major urban agglomerations by describing a technology trading market-based integration based on patent transfer. We found that regional integration of the technology transfer system of the three urban agglomerations both at overall level and technology supply chain level have not been realized. Among them, the Yangtze (Changjiang) River Delta (YRD) urban agglomeration is developing to integration, the technology acquisition of most cities depends on the internal inter-city technology transfer network. The integration of the Pearl (Zhujiang) River Delta (PRD) urban agglomeration ranked second, but it is developing in the opposite direction of integration. Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration (BTH) has the lowest level of integration, and technology acquisition in most cities is increasingly dependent on external inter-city technology transfer network. At the technical sales chain level, only the YRD has achieved regional integration, and the integrated technology transfer system with Shanghai as the core is accelerating. The technical sales of most cities in the PRD are increasingly dependent on the outside of the PRD, while the BTH is increasingly dependent on the inside of the BTH. Lastly, technology flows in the three urban agglomerations were increasingly moving across the border, and the intra-region technology transfer network was increasingly unable to meet the needs of technological development for the cities in the three urban agglomerations.

Key words: regional integration, technology transfer, Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration

中图分类号: 

  • K902