山东省乡村振兴与乡村旅游时空耦合研究

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.04.015

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

构建乡村振兴与乡村旅游评价指标体系,借助耦合协调模型对2008-2018年山东省乡村振兴与乡村旅游的耦合特征进行分析。研究表明:① 山东省乡村振兴与乡村旅游综合发展水平呈上升趋势;② 山东省属于乡村振兴主导型耦合协调,两大系统综合发展水平呈区域发展不均衡态势;③ 就时序性来说,山东省乡村振兴与乡村旅游耦合发展呈现阶段性和波动性,逐渐由低度耦合协调向中度耦合协调过渡,但尚未演化至良好耦合协调水平;④ 就空间异质性而论,山东省各市乡村振兴与乡村旅游耦合发展呈现差异性和区域性,各市的耦合协调组合状况与其经济水平、历史基础、资源禀赋、区位条件等存在空间的对应性。

关键词: 乡村振兴, 乡村旅游, 时序耦合, 空间耦合, 山东省

Abstract:

By analyzing the mechanism of the coupling and coordinated development of rural revitalization and rural tourism, the coupling index system and the coupling and coordinating model of Rural Revitalization and rural tourism are constructed. The method of entropy weighting and comprehensive evaluation is used. With the aid of the coupling and coordinating model, rural revitalization and rural tourism in Shandong Province from 2008 to 2018 and in 16 cities of Shandong Province in 2017 are studied. The comprehensive development evaluation function and the coupling coordination level are empirically analyzed. The results show that: 1) There is an interactive coupling relationship between rural revitalization and rural tourism, and the comprehensive development level of both shows a continuous upward trend. When the value of the comprehensive evaluation function of rural revitalization and rural tourism is low, the degree of coupling and coordination of the two is on the whole low and in a state of imbalance. With the full implementation of the strategy of rural revitalization and the sustainable development of rural tourism, the interactive coupling relationship between them has gradually strengthened, and the degree of coupling coordination has also been upgraded to the primary coordination state; 2) From the time series curve of the level of rural revitalization and comprehensive development of rural tourism in Shandong Province, the level of rural revitalization construction is continuously higher than that of rural tourism development water. The contribution of rural revitalization to rural tourism is greater than that of the latter, which belongs to the coupling and coordination of rural revitalization. From the spatial pattern of rural revitalization and comprehensive development of rural tourism in Shandong Province, due to the difference of resource endowment and the role of comparative advantage, the comprehensive development level of the two systems presents regional development; 3) In terms of time sequence, the coupling development of rural revitalization and rural tourism in Shandong Province shows stages and fluctuations. The degree of coupling coordination of the two systems has experienced serious imbalance, imbalance on the verge of imbalance to reluctant coordination and primary coordination, and the interaction between the two systems has been strengthened gradually, from the stage of serious imbalance to the stage of barely coordination and primary coordination. The transition from low-coupling coordination to moderate-coupling coordination has begun to develop in a healthy and orderly way, but it has not yet evolved to a good level of coupling coordination; 4) As far as spatial heterogeneity is concerned, the coupling development of rural revitalization and rural tourism in Shandong Province shows differences and regionality, and the coupling coordination degree of 16 cities in Shandong Province is divided into primary coordination. There are three types: Reluctant coordination and imbalance on the verge of imbalance, which are in the middle and lower level. There are certain spatial correspondence between the coupling coordination and combination of cities and their economic level, historical basis, resource endowment and location conditions. The phenomenon of unbalanced development and spatial heterogeneity between rural revitalization and rural tourism is obvious.

Key words: rural revitalization, rural tourism, sequential coupling, spatial coupling, Shandong Province

中图分类号:

F590.75

董文静, 王昌森, 张震. 山东省乡村振兴与乡村旅游时空耦合研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(4): 628-636.

Dong Wenjing, Wang Changsen, Zhang Zhen. The Space-time Coupling Between Rural Revitalization Strategy and Rural Tourism Development in Shandong Province[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(4): 628-636.

图/表 5

表1

乡村振兴与乡村旅游耦合评价指标体系"

系统	一级指标	二级指标
乡村振兴 $f x$	农村经济 $X 1$	乡村从业人员数（万人） $X 11$ ;乡村居民人均收入（元） $X 12$ ;农林牧渔业年总产值（亿元） $X 1 3$
	农村环境 $X 2$	生活垃圾无害化处理率（%） $X 21$ ;污水集中处理率（%） $X 22$ ;绿化园林景观普及率（%） $X 23$
	农村文化 $X 3$	行政村健身中心覆盖率（%） $X 31$ ;综合文化中心覆盖率（%） $X 32$ ;乡镇卫生院数（个） $X 33$
	农村设施 $X 4$	路面硬化率（%） $X 41$ ;自来水普及率（%） $X 42$ ;乡村卫生厕所普及率（%） $X 43$
	农民生活 $X 5$	最低生活保障人数比率（%） $X 51$ ;获新农合人数比率（%） $X 52$ ;乡村居民恩格尔系数（%） $X 53$
乡村旅游 $g y$	产业经济效益 $Y 1$	乡村旅游年经营收入（亿元） $Y 11$ ;住宿餐饮年零售总额（亿元） $Y 12$
	旅游产业规模 $Y 2$	乡村旅游年接待人次（亿人次） $Y 21$ ;省级旅游特色村（个） $Y 22$
	生态环境效益 $Y 3$	生态乡镇（个） $Y 31$ ;环境空气质量良好率（%） $Y 32$
	社会文化效益 $Y 4$	旅游从业人数（万户） $Y 41$ ;村民满意度（%） $Y 42$ ;村务财务公开度（%） $Y 43$

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

参考文献 25

[1]	朱媛媛, 甘依霖, 曾菊新 , 等. 基于乡村振兴战略的人居文化环境质量演变驱动机制研究——以长江中游城市群为例[J]. 地理科学, 2018,38(11):1855-1863. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.11.013
	[ Zhu Yuanyuan, Gan Yilin, Zeng Juxin et al. Study on the driving mechanism of the evolution of human settlement cultural environment quality based on the strategy of rural revitalization—Take the Middle Yangtze River Urban Agglomeration as an example. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018,38(11):1855-1863.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.11.013
[2]	向富华 . 乡村旅游开发:城镇化背景下“乡村振兴”的战略选择[J]. 旅游学刊, 2018,33(7):16-17.
	[ Xiang Fuhua . Rural tourism development: Strategic choice of ‘rural revitalization’ in the context of urbanization. Journal of Tourism, 2018,33(7):16-17.]
[3]	吴吉林, 周春山, 谢文海 . 传统村落农户乡村旅游适应性评价与影响因素研究——基于湘西州6个村落的调查[J]. 地理科学, 2018,38(5):755-763. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.05.013
	[ Wu Jilin, Zhou Chunshan, Xie Wenhai . Evaluation and influencing factors of rural tourism adaptability of farmers in traditional villages: Based on the survey of six villages in Xiangxi. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018,38(5):755-763.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.05.013
[4]	宋慧娟, 陈明 . 乡村振兴战略背景下乡村旅游提质增效路径探析[J]. 经济体制改革, 2018(6):76-81.
	[ Song Huijuan, Chen Ming . On the ways to improve the quality and efficiency of rural tourism under the strategic background of rural revitalization. Economic System Reform, 2018(6):76-81.]
[5]	蔡克信, 杨红, 马作珍莫 . 乡村旅游:实现乡村振兴战略的一种路径选择[J]. 农村经济, 2018(9):22-27.
	[ Cai Kexin, Yang Hong, Ma Zuojinmo . Rural tourism: A way to realize the strategy of rural revitalization. Rural Economy, 2018(9):22-27.]
[6]	王晨光 . 集体化乡村旅游发展模式对乡村振兴战略的影响与启示[J]. 山东社会科学, 2018(5):34-42.
	[ Wang Chenguang . The influence and enlightenment of collectivized rural tourism development model on rural revitalization strategy. Shandong Social Science, 2018(5):34-42.]
[7]	赵丽丽 . 乡村振兴战略视野下乡村旅游事业发展取向与实现机制研究[J]. 农业经济, 2018(8):39-41.
	[ Zhao Lili . Research on the development orientation and realization mechanism of rural tourism in the perspective of rural revitalization strategy. Agricultural Economy, 2018(8):39-41.]
[8]	银元, 李晓琴 . 乡村振兴战略背景下乡村旅游的发展逻辑与路径选择[J]. 国家行政学院学报, 2018(5):182-186+193.
	[ Yin Yuan, Li Xiaoqin . Development logic and path choice of rural tourism in the context of rural revitalization strategy. Journal of National College of Administration, 2018(5):182-186+193.]
[9]	朱建江 . 乡村振兴与乡村旅游发展:以上海为例[J]. 上海经济, 2017(6):17-24.
	[ Zhu Jianjiang . Rural revitalization and rural tourism development: Take Shanghai as an example. Shanghai Economy, 2017(6):17-24.]
[10]	Jana Jarábková, Ľubica Majstríková, Tomáš Kozolka . Financial supporting tools of rural tourism development in Nitra Self-Governing Region[J]. European Countryside, 2016,8(2):123-134. doi: 10.1515/euco-2016-0010
[11]	Lun L M, Pechlaner H, Volgger M . Rural tourism development in mountain regions: Identifying success factors, challenges and potentials[J]. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 2016,12(6):1-23.
[12]	Bernard Lane, Elisabeth Kastenholz . Rural tourism: The evolution of practice and research approaches-towards a new generation concept[J]. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2015,23(8):1133-1156. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2015.1083997
[13]	Leanna Popp, Dan McCole . Understanding tourists' itineraries in emerging rural tourism regions: The application of paper-based itinerary mapping methodology to a wine tourism region in Michigan[J]. Current Issues in Tourism, 2016,19(10):988-1004. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2014.942259
[14]	何成军, 李晓琴, 曾诚 . 乡村振兴战略下美丽乡村建设与乡村旅游耦合发展机制研究[J]. 四川师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2019,46(2):101-109.
	[ He Chengjun, Li Xiaoqin, Zeng Cheng . Research on the coupling development mechanism of beautiful rural construction and rural tourism under the strategy of rural revitalization. Journal of Sichuan Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2019,46(2):101-109.]
[15]	李志龙 . 乡村振兴-乡村旅游系统耦合机制与协调发展研究——以湖南凤凰县为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019,38(3):643-654. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020181165
	[ Li Zhilong . Coupling mechanism and coordinated development of rural revitalization-rural tourism system: A case study of Fenghuang County, Hunan Province. Geographical Research, 2019,38(3):643-654.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj020181165
[16]	时朋飞, 李星明, 熊元斌 . 区域美丽中国建设与旅游业发展耦合关联性测度及前景预测:以长江经济带11省市为例[J]. 中国软科学, 2018(2):86-102.
	[ Shi Pengfei, Li Xingming, Xiong Yuanbin . Measurement and prospect of coupling relation between regional beautiful China construction and tourism development: A case study of 11 provinces and cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. China Soft Science, 2018(2):86-102.]
[17]	山东省统计局. 山东统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社,2008-2018.
	[ Shandong Statistical Bureau . Shandong statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press,2008-2018.]
[18]	山东省旅游局. 山东旅游年鉴[M]. 济南: 山东人民出版社,2008-2018.
	[ Shandong Tourism Bureau . Shandong tourism yearbook. Jinan: Shandong People's Publishing House,2008-2018.]
[19]	丛小丽, 黄悦, 刘继生 . 吉林省生态旅游与旅游环境耦合协调度的时空演化研究[J]. 地理科学, 2019,39(3):496-505. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.03.016
	[ Cong Xiaoli, Huang Yue, Liu Jisheng . Spatialand temporal evolution of coupled coordination degree of ecotourism and tourism environment of Jilin Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019,39(3):496-505.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.03.016
[20]	赵雪雁, 王伟军, 万文玉 . 中国居民健康水平的区域差异:2003-2013[J]. 地理学报, 2017,72(4):685-698. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201704010
	[ Zhao Xueyan, Wang Weijun, Wan Wenyu . Regional inequalities of residents’health level in China: 2003-2013. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(4):685-698.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201704010
[21]	Valerie Illingworth . The penguin dictionary of physics[M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Press, 1996: 92-93.
[22]	刘耀彬, 李仁东, 宋学锋 , 等. 中国城市化与生态环境耦合度分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2005,20(1):105-112. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2005.01.015
	[ Liu Yaobin, Li Rendong, Song Xuefeng et al. Analysis of coupling degree between urbanization and ecological environment in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2005,20(1):105-112.] doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2005.01.015
[23]	李二玲, 崔之珍 . 中国区域创新能力与经济发展水平的耦合协调分析[J]. 地理科学, 2018,38(9):1412-1421.
	[ Li Erling, Cui Zhizhen . Coupling and coordination analysis of regional innovation capability and economic development level in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018,38(9):1412-1421.]
[24]	廖重斌 . 环境与经济协调发展的定量评判及其分类体系:以珠江三角洲城市群为例[J]. 热带地理, 1999,19(2):171-177.
	[ Liao Chongbin . Quantitative evaluation and classification system of harmonious development of environment and economy: Taking Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration as an example. Tropical Geography, 1999,19(2):171-177.]
[25]	于婷婷, 宋玉祥, 阿荣 , 等. 东北地区人口结构与经济发展耦合关系研究[J]. 地理科学, 2018,38(1):114-121. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.01.013
	[ Yu Tingting, Song Yuxiang, A Rong et al. The coupling relationship between population structure and economic development in Northeast China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018,38(1):114-121.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.01.013