城乡系统关联耦合的演化特征及地域类型划分

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.07.012

地理科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7): 1150-1159.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.07.012

城乡系统关联耦合的演化特征及地域类型划分

王颖¹(), 刘航¹, 陈晓红¹^,*(), 宋云婷²

1. 哈尔滨师范大学地理科学学院，黑龙江哈尔滨 150025
2. 长春市城乡规划设计研究院，吉林长春 130033

收稿日期:2019-08-11 出版日期:2020-07-10 发布日期:2020-12-07
通讯作者: 陈晓红 E-mail:dilixiwangying@126.com;chenxh440@163.com
作者简介:王颖(1984−)，女，山东日照人，博士，讲师，主要从事城市地理、城市与区域规划研究。E-mail： dilixiwangying@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41401182）、教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目（19YJC630177）、黑龙江省自然科学基金项目（LH2019D008）、黑龙江省普通本科高等学校青年创新人才培养计划（UNPYSCT-2018194）、哈尔滨师范大学人文社会科学优秀青年学者支持项目（SYQ2014-06）资助

Evolution Characteristics and Division of Regional Types of Correlation Coupling of Urban-Rural Systems: A Case Study of the Three Provinces of Northeast China

Wang Ying¹(), Liu Hang¹, Chen Xiaohong¹^,*(), Song Yunting²

1. College of Geographical Sciences, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025, Heilongjiang, China
2. Changchun Institute of Urban Planning and Design, Changchun 130033, Jilin, China

Received:2019-08-11 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-12-07
Contact: Chen Xiaohong E-mail:dilixiwangying@126.com;chenxh440@163.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (41401182), Youth Fund for Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education (19YJC630177), Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (LH2019D008), Innovative Youth Talent Cultivation Plan of Heilongjiang Provincial Universities (UNPYSCT-2018194), Human Civilization and Social Science Supportive Program for Excellent Young Scholars of Harbin Normal University (SYQ2014-06).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于城乡系统关联耦合的概念内涵，以东北三省34个地级市为研究单元，采用2003—2017年的城、乡发展数据，运用灰色关联模型，对东北三省城乡关联的内部要素作用、城乡耦合时空特征以及城乡关联耦合地域类型进行研究。结果表明：东北三省历年城、乡各要素间关联度均在0.5以上，属于较高关联；城、乡子系统中对城乡关联耦合的强作用要素集中于城市系统的经济、空间领域以及乡村系统的经济领域，弱作用要素集中于城市系统的工业、社会领域与乡村系统的人口、社会领域；2003—2017年，东北三省城乡耦合度平均值由0.788下降至0.692，城乡相互作用趋于缓和、城乡协调适应性不断增强；东北三省城乡耦合度呈现“南低北高、南北差异日渐缩小、高值集中于各省经济落后区域、低值向四大中心城市极化”的空间格局；东北三省34个城市的城乡关联耦合演化可划分为高水平协调稳定型、高水平协调倒退型、较低水平协调倒退型、低水平与较低水平协调发展型、低水平与较低水平协调稳定型5种类型。

关键词: 城乡系统, 关联耦合, 地域类型, 东北三省

Abstract:

Starting from the conceptual characteristics of the correlation coupling of urban-rural system, taking 34 prefecture-level cities in the three provinces of Northeast China as research units, using the data of urban and rural development from 2003 to 2017, and using the grey correlation model, this paper studies the internal driving factors, spatial and temporal characteristics, and the regional types of urban-rural correlation coupling. The results show that: the correlation degree between urban and rural factors in the three provinces of Northeast China is over 0.5, which is a relatively high correlation. The strong factors for urban and rural system are concentrated on the economic and spatial fields of urban subsystem and the economic field of the rural system, and the strong factors of the urban sub-system are obviously more than that of the rural subsystem. In 2003-2017, the average urban-rural coupling degree in Northeast China showed a gradual decline, from 0.788 to 0.692, indicating that the urban-rural interaction tended to be eased and the coupling between urban and rural areas increased. The spatial pattern of urban-rural coupling in the three provinces of Northeast China showed “south low north high, north south difference narrowing, high value is concentrated in the backward areas of the three provinces and the four major centers is the polarization of low value”. The correlation coupling of urban and rural areas in 34 cities in the three provinces of Northeast China can be divided into five evolution types: high level coordination stability type, high level coordination regression type, lower level coordination decline type, low level and lower level coordination rising type, low level and lower level coordination stability type.

Key words: urban and rural system, correlation coupling, regional type, the three provinces of Northeast China

中图分类号:

F291.3

王颖, 刘航, 陈晓红, 宋云婷. 城乡系统关联耦合的演化特征及地域类型划分[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(7): 1150-1159.

Wang Ying, Liu Hang, Chen Xiaohong, Song Yunting. Evolution Characteristics and Division of Regional Types of Correlation Coupling of Urban-Rural Systems: A Case Study of the Three Provinces of Northeast China[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(7): 1150-1159.

图/表 5

表 1

图 1

图 2

图 3

图 4

参考文献 30

[1]	Warren R J, Reed K, Olejnizcak M Rural land use bifurcation in the urban-rural gradient[J]. Urban Ecosystems, 2018. 21 (3): 577- 583. doi: 10.1007/s11252-018-0734-1
[2]	杨浩, 罗震东, 张京祥从二元到三元: 城乡统筹视角下的都市区空间重构[J]. 国际城市规划, 2014. 29 (4): 21- 26.
	Yang Hao, Luo Zhendong, Zhang Jingxiang From“dualistic structure”to “ternary structure”econstruction of metropolitan area space based on urban and rural harmonious[J]. Urban Planning International, 2014. 29 (4): 21- 26.
[3]	薛晴, 霍有光城乡一体化的理论渊源及其嬗变轨迹考察[J]. 经济地理, 2010. 30 (11): 1779- 1809.
	Xue Qing, Huo Youguang The origin and evolution path survey of the urban and rural integration[J]. Economic Geography, 2010. 30 (11): 1779- 1809.
[4]	McGee T G. Urbanisasi or kotadesasi? Evolving patterns of urbanization in Asia[C] // Costa F J et al. Urbanization in Asia: Spatial dimensions and policy issues. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1989: 93-108.
[5]	陈肖飞, 姚士谋, 张落成新型城镇化背景下中国城乡统筹的理论与实践问题[J]. 地理科学, 2016. 36 (2): 188- 194.
	Chen Xiaofei, Yao Shimou, Zhang Luocheng The theory and practice of urban-rural integration in China under the new urbanization[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016. 36 (2): 188- 194.
[6]	吴丽娟, 刘玉亭, 程慧城乡统筹发展的动力机制和关键内容研究述评[J]. 经济地理, 2012. 32 (4): 113- 118.
	Wu Lijuan, Liu Yuting, Cheng Hui Review on the dynamic mechanism and key elements of urban-rural integrated development in China[J]. Economic Geography, 2012. 32 (4): 113- 118.
[7]	王艳飞, 刘彦随, 严镔, 等中国城乡协调发展格局特征及影响因素[J]. 地理科学, 2016. 36 (1): 20- 28.
	Wang Yanfei, Liu Yansui, Yan Bin et al Spatial patterns and influencing factors of urban-rural coordinated development in China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016. 36 (1): 20- 28.
[8]	刘春芳, 张志英从城乡一体化到城乡融合: 新型城乡关系的思考[J]. 地理科学, 2018. 38 (10): 1624- 1633.
	Liu Chunfang, Zhang Zhiying From town-country integration to urban-rural integration: New thinking on the relationship between urban and rural areas[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018. 38 (10): 1624- 1633.
[9]	Cecilia T Rural-urban interactions: A guide to the literature[J]. Environment and Urbanization, 2006. 10 (1): 147- 166.
[10]	程叶青, 邓吉祥吉林省中部粮食主产区城乡系统耦合的关联分析[J]. 经济地理, 2012. 32 (1): 126- 130.
	Cheng Yeqing, Deng Jixiang The association analysis of urban-rural coupling on the major grain-producing areas of central Jilin Province[J]. Economic Geography, 2012. 32 (1): 126- 130.
[11]	孙平军, 修春亮, 董超东北地区经济空间极化及其驱动因子的定量研究[J]. 人文地理, 2013. 28 (1): 87- 93.
	Sun Pingjun, Xiu Chunliang, Dong Chao Quantitative analysis of economic spatial polarization and driving factors in the Northeast of China[J]. Human Geography, 2013. 28 (1): 87- 93.
[12]	陈晓红, 万鲁河城市化与生态环境耦合的脆弱性与协调性作用机制研究[J]. 地理科学, 2013. 32 (12): 1450- 1457.
	Chen Xiaohong, Wan Luhe The interactive mechanisms for the coordination and vulnerability between regional urban and eco-environment[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013. 32 (12): 1450- 1457.
[13]	吴永生区域性城乡统筹的空间特征及其形成机制——以江苏省市域城乡为例[J]. 经济地理, 2006. (5): 810- 814. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8462.2006.05.019
	Wu Yongsheng A study on regional spatial characteristics and forming mechanism of planning overall cities and countryside—A case study of city area in Jiangsu Province[J]. Economic Geography, 2006. (5): 810- 814. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8462.2006.05.019
[14]	杨娜曼, 肖地楚, 黄静波城乡统筹发展视角下湖南省城乡协调发展评价[J]. 经济地理, 2014. 34 (4): 58- 64.
	Yang Naman, Xiao Dichu, Huang Jingbo Urban and rural balanced development evaluation in Hunan Province[J]. Economic Geography, 2014. 34 (4): 58- 64.
[15]	周蕾, 杨山, 陈升无锡市城乡系统耦合测度与耦合度变化规律研究[J]. 人文地理, 2011. 26 (6): 77- 82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2398.2011.06.015
	Zhou Lei, Yang Shan, Chen Sheng Research on the coupling measurement of urban and rural system and the variation of coupling degree in Wuxi[J]. Human Geography, 2011. 26 (6): 77- 82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2398.2011.06.015
[16]	王磊, 李涛, 曹小曙基于ESDA-GIS的广东省城乡统筹发展空间分异[J]. 经济地理, 2012. 32 (9): 44- 50.
	Wang Lei, Li Tao, Cao Xiaoshu Spatial difference of urban and rural harmonious development with ESDA-GIS framework in Guangdong Province[J]. Economic Geography, 2012. 32 (9): 44- 50.
[17]	张改素, 王发曾, 丁志伟河南省城乡统筹发展的时空特征与定位推进[J]. 人文地理, 2013. 28 (4): 89- 95.
	Zhang Gaisu, Wang Fazeng, Ding Zhiwei A study on spatial-temporal characteristics and positioning propulsion of urban-rural coordination development in Henan Province[J]. Human Geography, 2013. 28 (4): 89- 95.
[18]	国家统计局城市社会经济调查司. 中国城市统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2004-2018.
	Department of Urban Socio-economic Survey of National Bureau of Statistics. China urban statistics yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2004-2018.
[19]	辽宁省统计局. 辽宁统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2004-2018.
	Statistical Bureau of Liaoning Province. Liaoning statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2004-2018.
[20]	吉林省统计局. 吉林统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2004-2018.
	Statistical Bureau of Jilin Province. Jilin statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2004-2018.
[21]	黑龙江省统计局. 黑龙江统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2004-2018.
	Statistical Bureau of Heilongjiang Province. Heilongjiang statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2004-2018.
[22]	国家统计局农村社会经济调查局. 中国县市社会经济统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2004-2018.
	Department of Rural Socio-economic Survey of National Bureau of Statistics of China. China county statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2004-2018.
[23]	刘耀彬, 李仁东, 宋学锋中国区域城市化与生态环境耦合的关联分析[J]. 地理学报, 2005. 60 (4): 237- 247.
	Liu Yaobin, Li Rendong, Song Xuefeng Grey associative analysis of regional urbanization and eco-system coupling in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005. 60 (4): 237- 247.
[24]	毕其格, 宝音, 李百岁内蒙古人口结构与区域经济耦合的关联分析[J]. 地理研究, 2007. 26 (5): 995- 1004. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2007.05.016
	Bi Qige, Bao Yin, Li Baisui Relevancy analysis of the coupling between population structure and regional economy in Inner Mongolia[J]. Geographical Research, 2007. 26 (5): 995- 1004. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2007.05.016
[25]	黄晓军, 李诚固城市物质环境与人口结构耦合的关联分析——以长春市为例[J]. 人文地理, 2011. 26 (6): 114- 119. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2398.2011.06.021
	Huang Xiaojun, Li Chenggu A relevancy analysis of the coupling between physical environment and population structure—A case study of Changchun[J]. Human Geography, 2011. 26 (6): 114- 119. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2398.2011.06.021
[26]	吴连霞, 赵媛, 管卫华, 等江苏省人口–经济耦合与经济发展阶段关联分析[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2016. 35 (1): 57- 63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2016.01.011
	Wu Lianxia, Zhao Yuan, Guan Weihua et al Association analysis on the coupling types between population economic development and economic development stages in Jiangsu province[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2016. 35 (1): 57- 63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2016.01.011
[27]	范洪敏, 穆怀中中国人口结构与产业结构耦合分析[J]. 经济地理, 2015. 35 (12): 12- 17.
	Fan Hongmin, Mu Huaizhong The coupling between population structure and industrial structure of China[J]. Economic Geography, 2015. 35 (12): 12- 17.
[28]	吴连霞, 赵媛, 吴开亚人口结构与经济耦合发展空间演化特征研究——以江苏省县域尺度为例[J]. 人口与发展, 2018. 24 (2): 43- 53.
	Wu Lianxia, Zhao Yuan, Wu Kaiya Research on the spatial pattern of coupling between population structure and economic development—A case study of counties in Jiangsu Province[J]. Population and Development, 2018. 24 (2): 43- 53.
[29]	高翯,王士君,谭亮东北振兴以来吉林省区域经济差异的时空演变研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017. 37 (1): 1712- 1719.
	Gao He, Wang Shijun, Tan Liang Regional economic disparities and spatio-temporal evolution in Jilin Province since 2003[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017. 37 (1): 1712- 1719.
[30]	马仁锋, 周小靖, 李倩长江三角洲地区特色小镇地域类型及其适应性营造路径[J]. 地理科学, 2019. 39 (6): 912- 919.
	Ma Renfeng, Zhou Xiaojing, Li Qian Regional types of the characteristic towns and its adaptive path in the Yangtze River Delta Region[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019. 39 (6): 912- 919.

年份	城市对乡村		乡村对城市
年份	强作用要素	弱作用要素	强作用要素	弱作用要素
2003	X1; X3; X8	X2; X5; X10	X12; X13; X14	X16; X17; X21
2004	X1; X3; X8	X7; X10; X11	X12; X13; X14	X16; X17; X21
2005	X1; X4; X8	X3; X10; X11	X12; X13; X14	X16; X17; X21
2006	X1; X3; X8	X7; X10; X11	X12; X13; X14	X16; X17; X21
2007	X1; X4; X8	X9; X10; X11	X12; X13; X14	X17; X20; X21
2008	X1; X3; X8	X9; X10; X11	X12; X13; X14	X16; X17; X21
2009	X1; X3; X8	X9; X10; X11	X12; X13; X14	X16; X17; X21
2010	X1; X3; X8	X9; X10; X11	X12; X13; X14	X16; X17; X21
2011	X1; X3; X8	X9; X10; X11	X12; X13; X14	X16; X17; X21
2012	X1; X3; X8	X2; X9; X10	X12; X13; X14	X16; X17; X21
2013	X1; X3; X11	X2; X9; X10	X12; X13; X14	X17; X20; X21
2014	X1; X3; X11	X2; X9; X10	X12; X13; X14	X17; X20; X21
2015	X1; X3; X8	X2; X9; X10	X12; X13; X14	X17; X20; X21
2016	X1; X5; X11	X2; X9; X10	X12; X13; X14	X17; X20; X21
2017	X1; X5; X11	X2; X9; X10	X12; X13; X14	X17; X20;X21

城乡系统关联耦合的演化特征及地域类型划分

Evolution Characteristics and Division of Regional Types of Correlation Coupling of Urban-Rural Systems: A Case Study of the Three Provinces of Northeast China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	马丽, 田华征, 康蕾, 戚伟. 东北三省全面振兴的社会经济支撑能力评估[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(6): 863-873.
[2]	刘鉴, 杨青山, 张郁, 刘杰, 江孝君. 东北三省县级尺度人口老龄化空间格局演变及类型划分[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(6): 918-927.
[3]	江孝君, 杨青山, 刘杰, 沈方, 刘鉴. 东北三省区域经济差异的多尺度与多机制研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(3): 383-392.
[4]	古恒宇, 李琦婷, 沈体雁. 东北三省流动人口居留意愿的空间差异及影响因素[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(2): 261-269.
[5]	黄禹铭. 东北三省城乡协调发展格局及影响因素[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(8): 1302-1311.
[6]	马丽亚,修春亮,冯兴华. 基于母子企业联系的东北三省城市网络特征[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(7): 1129-1138.
[7]	陈卓,金凤君,王姣娥. 基于高速公路流的东北大都市区边界识别与结构特征研究[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(6): 929-937.
[8]	田俊峰, 王彬燕, 王士君. 东北三省城市土地利用效益评价及耦合协调关系研究[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(2): 305-315.
[9]	吴浩, 王秀, 周宏浩, 王颖, 陈晓红. 东北三省资源型收缩城市经济效率与生计脆弱性的时空分异与协调演化特征[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(12): 1962-1971.
[10]	韩增林, 孙嘉泽, 刘天宝, 彭飞, 钟敬秋. 东北三省创新全要素生产率增长的时空特征及其发展趋势预测[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(2): 161-171.
[11]	戚伟, 刘盛和, 金凤君. 东北三省人口流失的测算及演化格局研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(12): 1795-1804.
[12]	刘洋, 王雨飞, 刘勇, 王光辉. 基于生态位理论的东北三省政府干预强度与市场化水平格局演变研究[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(9): 1301-1309.
[13]	郑蕾, 刘毅, 刘卫东. 东北三省对外直接投资空间格局及影响因素[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(9): 1329-1337.
[14]	刘志高, 张薇, 刘卫东. 中国东北三省对外贸易空间格局研究[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(9): 1349-1358.
[15]	关伟, 曹佳宾, 许淑婷. 东北三省服务业发展空间极化的演变及驱动因子分析[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(6): 733-741.