地理科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 1460-1467.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.09.007
肖凡1,2(), 陈家麟1, 夏丽丽1,*(
), 林剑铬1, 邓伟鹏3
收稿日期:
2019-03-14
出版日期:
2020-09-10
发布日期:
2020-12-05
通讯作者:
夏丽丽
E-mail:xiaofan2014@m.scnu.edu.cn;hslily@163.com
作者简介:
肖凡(1995−),男,广东韶关人,博士研究生,主要研究方向为高速铁路与区域创新创业。E-mail: 基金资助:
Xiao Fan1,2(), Chen Jialin1, Xia Lili1,*(
), Lin Jiange1, Deng Weipeng3
Received:
2019-03-14
Online:
2020-09-10
Published:
2020-12-05
Contact:
Xia Lili
E-mail:xiaofan2014@m.scnu.edu.cn;hslily@163.com
Supported by:
摘要:
以上市高新技术企业为例,通过建立Tobit模型,实证分析了股东技术水平对企业创新绩效的影响,进而探讨资金流带来的技术溢出机制。研究发现:高新技术企业与股东呈现出分离的空间布局特征,其中股东和资金流空间主要分布在中国的东部地区;股东技术水平对被投资企业创新绩效有正向影响并表现出稳健的结果;同时,股东作为区域外联系的对象,其投资行为使得创新主体之间相互作用的门槛更低,通过建立通畅的知识人才互动管道和更低的研发合作门槛,实现了技术溢出。并做出以下建议:资金流带动的技术外溢增加了技术学习的新路径,创新落后地区在引入高新技术企业限制的情况下,可引入携带技术的资金以达到补充效果。
中图分类号:
肖凡, 陈家麟, 夏丽丽, 林剑铬, 邓伟鹏. 伴随资金流的技术溢出[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(9): 1460-1467.
Xiao Fan, Chen Jialin, Xia Lili, Lin Jiange, Deng Weipeng. Another Alternative for Technology Spillover: Influence of Shareholders’ Technical Level on Innovation[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(9): 1460-1467.
表 1
变量定义及描述性统计"
变量类型 | 变量 | 单位 | 平均值 | 标准差 | 最小值 | 最大值 |
因变量 | ||||||
被投资企业的创新绩效 | 创新绩效 | 个 | 81.180 | 296.933 | 0 | 3376 |
专利数 | 个 | 73.854 | 292.597 | 0 | 3364 | |
软件著作权数 | 个 | 7.327 | 21.256 | 0 | 220 | |
自变量 | ||||||
股东技术水平 | 股东智慧产权数 | 个 | 259.744 | 2036.418 | 0 | 36267 |
控制变量 | ||||||
地理邻近 | 股东与企业距离 | km | 285.970 | 599.961 | 0.029 | 4049.799 |
最大股东持股比例 | 最大股东持股比例 | % | 45.327 | 19.308 | 0.710 | 99.700 |
公司年龄 | 公司年龄 | d | 5724.168 | 2216.391 | 1476 | 13736 |
企业规模 | 企业员工数 | 人 | 3746.130 | 14525.260 | 5 | 283637 |
营业收入 | 亿元 | 74.500 | 469 | 1.727×10?4 | 8580 | |
资产总额 | 亿元 | 112 | 555 | 9.895×10?3 | 8500 | |
研发投入 | 研发费用 | 亿元 | 1.310 | 6.480 | 4.528×10?5 | 103 |
知识存量 | 技术人员人数 | 人 | 789.996 | 4395.074 | 1.667 | 98162.660 |
企业性质 | 是否是国有企业 | 是/否 | 0.321 | 0.467 | 0 | 1 |
工具变量 | ||||||
股东年龄 | 股东年龄 | d | 5679.684 | 4157.749 | 135 | 43100 |
表 2
Tobit模型回归结果"
变量 | 模型 1(创新绩效) | 模型2(专利数) | 模型 3(软件著作权数) |
股东智慧产权数 | 0.057*** | 0.057*** | 0.001* |
股东与企业距离 | ?0.034* | ?0.036** | ?0.003 |
最大股东持股比例 | ?1.351** | ?1.613*** | ?0.192** |
公司年龄 | 0.001 | 0.005 | ?0.002*** |
营业收入 | 0.025 | ?0.026 | 0.004 |
资产总额 | ?0.058 | ?0.054 | ?0.018** |
研发费用 | 25.100*** | 24.400*** | 1.430*** |
技术人员人数 | ?0.015*** | ?0.015*** | 0.001 |
是否是国有企业 | 28.471 | 38.971 | 6.989** |
常数项 | 70.000 | 20.461 | 5.012 |
对数似然值 | ?4757.658 | ?4385.536 | ?1901.811 |
Likelihood ratio Chi2(df.) | 241.580*** | 231.410*** | 47.640*** |
样本量 | 794 | 794 | 794 |
[1] |
Lin J J, Feng C M, Lee Y N Influence of accessibility on innovation: Empirical study of electronics industry in northern Taiwan[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2007. 1994 (1): 74- 79.
doi: 10.3141/1994-10 |
[2] |
Nonaka I, Von Krogh G Perspective—Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory[J]. Organization Science, 2009. 20 (3): 635- 652.
doi: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0412 |
[3] |
Roper S, Hewitt-Dundas N Knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and innovation: Evidence from matched patents and innovation panel data[J]. Research Policy, 2015. 44 (7): 1327- 1340.
doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.03.003 |
[4] |
Asheim B T, Isaksen A Location, agglomeration and innovation: Towards regional innovation systems in Norway?[J]. European Planning Studies, 1997. 5 (3): 299- 330.
doi: 10.1080/09654319708720402 |
[5] |
Dos Santos Silvestre B, Dalcol P R T Geographical proximity and innovation: Evidences from the Campos Basin oil & gas industrial agglomeration—Brazil[J]. Technovation, 2009. 29 (8): 546- 561.
doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.01.003 |
[6] | 贺灿飞, 金璐璐, 刘颖 多维邻近性对中国出口产品空间演化的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2017. 36 (9): 1613- 1626. |
He Canfei, Jin Lulu, Liu Ying How does multi-proximity affect the evolution of export product space in China?[J]. Geographical Research, 2017. 36 (9): 1613- 1626. | |
[7] | 邹琳, 曾刚, 司月芳, 等 创新网络研究进展述评与展望[J]. 人文地理, 2018. (4): 7- 12, 67. |
Zou Lin, Zeng Gang, Si Yuefang, et al Literature review and prospect on innovation network[J]. Human Geography, 2018. (4): 7- 12, 67. | |
[8] | 周灿, 曾刚, 辛晓睿, 等 中国电子信息产业创新网络演化——基于SAO模型的实证[J]. 经济地理, 2018. 38 (4): 116- 122. |
Zhou Can, Zeng Gang, Xin Xiaorui, et al The dynamics of China’s electronic information industry innovation networks: An empirical research based on SAO model[J]. Economic Geography, 2018. 38 (4): 116- 122. | |
[9] | 胡杨, 李郇 多维邻近性对产学研合作创新的影响—广州市高新技术企业的案例分析[J]. 地理研究, 2017. 36 (4): 695- 706. |
Hu Yang, Li Xun The impact of multi-dimensional proximities on university-industry cooperative innovation: Case studies of high-tech enterprises in Guangzhou[J]. Geographical Research, 2017. 36 (4): 695- 706. | |
[10] | 张省 地理邻近促进产学研协同创新吗?——基于多维邻近整合的视角[J]. 人文地理, 2017,32. (4): 102- 107. |
Zhang Xing Does geographical proximity promote collaborative innovation of industry-university-research?[J]. Human Geography, 2017,32. (4): 102- 107. | |
[11] | 张艳辉, 李宗伟, 陈林 研发资金投入对企业技术创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2012. (11): 63- 67. |
Zhang Yanhui, Li Zongwei, Chen Lin The influence of D&D capital investment on enterprise technology innovation performance[J]. Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics, 2012. (11): 63- 67. | |
[12] | 刘斌斌, 左勇华 资金来源、创新模式对高新技术产业创新绩效影响研究——以江西省为例[J]. 江西社会科学, 2016. (7): 68- 72. |
Liu Binbin, Zuo Yonghua Research on the impact of fund sources and innovation models on innovation performance of high-tech industry: Taking Jiangxi Province as an example[J]. Jiangxi Social Sciences, 2016. (7): 68- 72. | |
[13] | 李华 创新驱动发展战略下研发支出资本化的实证研究[J]. 世界经济与政治论坛, 2015. (6): 126- 140. |
Li Hua An empirical study on the capitalization of R&D expenditure under the innovation driven development strategy[J]. Forum of World Economics & Politics, 2015. (6): 126- 140. | |
[14] | 张峰, 杨建君 股东积极主义视角下大股东参与行为对企业创新绩效的影响——风险承担的中介作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2016. 19 (4): 4- 12. |
Zhang Feng, Yang Jianjun Large shareholders’ participation behaviors, managers’ risk taking, and firm innovation performance: A shareholder activism perspective[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2016. 19 (4): 4- 12. | |
[15] | 胡曲应 公司治理结构、股利分配与企业创新绩效三元关系实证研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017. 34 (18): 88- 94. |
Hu Quying An empirical research on the ternary relationships between corporate governance structure, dividend distribution and corporate innovative performance[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2017. 34 (18): 88- 94. | |
[16] | 朱德胜, 周晓珮 股权制衡、高管持股与企业创新效率[J]. 南开管理评论, 2016. 19 (3): 136- 144. |
Zhu Desheng, Zhou Xiaopei Equity restriction, managerial ownership and enterprise innovation efficiency[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2016. 19 (3): 136- 144. | |
[17] |
Fritsch M, Franke G Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation[J]. Research Policy, 2004. 33 (2): 245- 255.
doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00123-9 |
[18] | Hagedoorn J, Duysters G The effect of mergers and acquisitions on the technological performance of companies in a high-tech environment[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2002. 14 (1): 67- 85. |
[19] |
Lee C, Park G, Kang J The impact of convergence between science and technology on innovation[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2018. 43 (2): 522- 544.
doi: 10.1007/s10961-016-9480-9 |
[20] | Zhu Shengjun, He Canfei, Zhou Yi How to jump further and catch up? Path-breaking in an uneven industry space[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2017. 17 (3): 521- 545. |
[21] | 史焱文, 李二玲, 李小建 地理邻近、关系邻近对农业产业集群创新影响——基于山东省寿光蔬菜产业集群实证研究[J]. 地理科学, 2016. 36 (5): 751- 759. |
Shi Yanwen, Li Erling, Li Xiaojian Impact of geographical proximity and relational proximity on innovation in agriculture industrial cluster based on the Shouguang vegetable-industrial cluster[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016. 36 (5): 751- 759. | |
[22] | 夏丽丽, 王润晓, 梁新怡, 等 全球−地方背景下东道国企业研发行为的演变及其影响因素研究——基于技术溢出视角的广州市本土制造企业微观实证[J]. 地理科学, 2019. 39 (2): 277- 284. |
Xia Lili, Wang Runxiao, Liang Xinyi, et al Evolution of R&D behavior and influential factors of indigenous enterprises of host countries under the global-local background: A case study of manufacturing enterprises in Guangzhou from the perspective of technology spillover[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019. 39 (2): 277- 284. | |
[23] |
Krafft J, Quatraro F, Saviotti P P The knowledge-base evolution in biotechnology: A social network analysis[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2011. 20 (5): 445- 475.
doi: 10.1080/10438599.2011.562355 |
[24] |
Boschma R, Neffke F, Henning M How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions[J]. Economic Geography, 2011. 87 (3): 237- 265.
doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x |
[25] |
Zhu Shengjun, Wang Chong, He Canfei High-speed rail network and changing industrial dynamics in Chinese regions[J]. International Regional Science Review, 2019.
doi: 10.1177/0160017619835908 |
[26] |
Rosenbusch N, Brinckmann J, Bausch A Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2011. 26 (4): 441- 457.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002 |
[27] | 姚铮, 王嵩 创业投资机构持股对企业研发绩效影响的实证研究[J]. 金融理论与实践, 2014. (2): 67- 70. |
Yao Zheng, Wang Song An empirical study on the impact of venture capital institutions’ shareholdings on corporate R&D performance[J]. Financial Theory & Practice, 2014. (2): 67- 70. | |
[28] | 王缉慈. 创新的空间: 企业集群与区域发展[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2001. |
Wang Jici. Enterprise clusters and regional development. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2001. | |
[29] |
Fishman E, Böcker L, Helbich M Adult active transport in the Netherlands: An analysis of its contribution to physical activity requirements[J]. PLoS One, 2015. 10 (4): e0121871.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121871 |
[30] | 梁育填, 樊杰, 孙威, 等 西南山区农村生活能源消费结构的影响因素分析——以云南省昭通市为例[J]. 地理学报, 2012. 67 (2): 221- 229. |
Liang Yutian, Fan Jie, Sun Wei, et al The influencing factors of rural household energy consumption structure in mountainous areas of southwest China: A case study of Zhaotong City of Yunnan Province[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012. 67 (2): 221- 229. | |
[31] | 吕拉昌. 创新地理学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017. |
Lu Lachang. The geography of innovation. Beijing: Science Press, 2017. | |
[32] | 赵勇, 白永秀 知识溢出测度方法研究综述[J]. 统计与决策, 2009. (8): 132- 135. |
Zhao Yong, Bai Yongxiu Review on the measurement of knowledge spillovers[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2009. (8): 132- 135. | |
[33] |
Feldman M P The new economics of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration: A review of empirical studies[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1999. 8 (1-2): 5- 25.
doi: 10.1080/10438599900000002 |
[34] | 符文颖 福特−后福特二元生产系统下的企业创新行为——以珠江三角洲电子产业为例[J]. 地理科学, 2013. 33 (8): 942- 948. |
Fu Wenying Firm innovation behavior under the Fordism-post Fordism dual production system: A case study of electronics industry in the Zhujiang River Delta[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013. 33 (8): 942- 948. | |
[35] | 林兰, 曾刚, 吕国庆 基于创新“二分法”的中国装备制造业创新网络研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017. 37 (10): 1469- 1477. |
Lin Lan, Zeng Gang, Lyu Guoqing Innovation network of the Chinese equipment manufacturing industry: Based on the dichotomy of innovation[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017. 37 (10): 1469- 1477. |
[1] | 辛晓华, 吕拉昌. 中国主要城市技术创新影响环境污染的空间分异与机理[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 129-139. |
[2] | 叶琴, 曾刚. 不同知识基础产业创新网络与创新绩效比较[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8): 1235-1244. |
[3] | 仇方道, 张春丽, 郭梦梦, 郑紫颜, 单勇兵. 中国再生性资源型城市创新能力与工业转型耦合协调分析[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(7): 1092-1103. |
[4] | 刘心怡. 粤港澳大湾区城市创新网络结构与分工研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(6): 874-881. |
[5] | 王晓辰, 韩增林, 彭飞, 蔡先哲. 中国海洋科技创新效率发展格局演变与类型划分[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(6): 890-899. |
[6] | 李二玲. 中国农业产业集群演化过程及创新发展机制——以“寿光模式”蔬菜产业集群为例[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(4): 617-627. |
[7] | 范斐, 连欢, 王雪利, 王嵩. 区域协同创新对创新绩效的影响机制研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(2): 165-172. |
[8] | 李在军, 姜友雪, 秦兴方. 地方品质驱动新时期中国城市创新力时空演化[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(11): 1812-1821. |
[9] | 盛彦文, 苟倩, 宋金平. 城市群创新联系网络结构与创新效率研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(11): 1831-1839. |
[10] | 俞立平. 区域创新政策评价的框架、测度与检验[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(10): 1610-1617. |
[11] | 段德忠, 杜德斌, 杨凡, 谌颖. 产业技术变迁与全球技术创新体系空间演化[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(9): 1378-1387. |
[12] | 马双,曾刚. 网络视角下中国十大城市群区域创新模式研究[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(6): 905-911. |
[13] | 刘树峰, 杜德斌, 覃雄合, 侯纯光. 基于创新价值链视角下中国创新效率时空格局与影响因素分析[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(2): 173-182. |
[14] | 孙瑜康, 李国平, 席强敏. 技术机会、行业异质性与大城市创新集聚——以北京市制造业为例[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(2): 252-258. |
[15] | 夏丽丽, 王润晓, 梁新怡, 肖凡. 全球-地方背景下东道国企业研发行为的演变及其影响因素研究——基于技术溢出视角的广州市本土制造企业微观实证[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(2): 277-284. |
|