大理洱海旅游环境治理事件中的主体博弈与权益协商

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.09.008

地理科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 1468-1475.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.09.008

大理洱海旅游环境治理事件中的主体博弈与权益协商

孙九霞¹(), 陈景¹, 黄秀波²^,*()

1. 中山大学旅游学院/中山大学旅游休闲与社会发展研究中心，广东广州 510275
2. 广东财经大学地理与旅游学院，广东广州 510320

收稿日期:2019-10-09 出版日期:2020-09-10 发布日期:2020-12-05
通讯作者: 黄秀波 E-mail:sunjx@mail.sysu.edu.cn;huangxb@gdufe.edu.cn
作者简介:孙九霞（1969‒），女，山东寿光人，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要研究旅游人类学、社区旅游、旅游与乡村发展。E-mail： sunjx@mail.sysu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重大项目（15ZDB118）、国家自然科学基金项目（41801126，41771160，41671134）资助

The Bargain Between Subjects and Rights Negotiation in the Tourism Environmental Governance Issue of Erhai in Dali, Yunan Province

Sun Jiuxia¹(), Chen Jing¹, Huang Xiubo²^,*()

1. School of Tourism Management/Center for Tourism, Leisure and Social Development, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, China
2. School of Geography and Tourism, Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, Guangzhou 510320, Guangdong, China

Received:2019-10-09 Online:2020-09-10 Published:2020-12-05
Contact: Huang Xiubo E-mail:sunjx@mail.sysu.edu.cn;huangxb@gdufe.edu.cn
Supported by:
National Social Science Foundation (15ZDB118), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41801126, 41771160, 41671134)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以大理洱海环境治理事件为典型案例，基于半结构式访谈、观察法等质性方法，从环境正义视角切入分析洱海环境治理中的主体博弈与权益协商议题。研究发现，洱海的环境治理是一种以环境名义开展地社会治理与目的地管理过程，逐渐从治理水环境延伸至环境、民生、产业升级等多方面的综合治理；洱海治理隐含权力张力与利益冲突，本地村民、旅游经营者及地方基层政府三方基于合情、合理与合法性原则，围绕“情、理、法”逻辑进行利益博弈与协商；乡村旅游中的环境治理应置于乡村与社会治理框架体系下进行，关照民生与发展。环境正义理论可解释乡村旅游中的环境治理与冲突现象，为揭示环境治理背后的利益冲突与社会问题提供独特视角。

关键词: 环境治理, 环境正义, 乡村旅游, 权力博弈, 大理洱海

Abstract:

The relationships between human and nature, as well as development and environmental protection have become a major problem in the development of ethnic minority areas. Taking the Erhai Lake environmental governance issue in Dali,Yunan Province as a typical case, based on qualitative methods such as semi-structured interviews and observation methods, this paper analyzes the bargain between subjects and negotiation of rights in environmental governance of Erhai Lake from the perspective of environmental justice and power game. This research finds that, environmental governance of Erhai Lake is a process of social governance and destination management in the name of the environment, which gradually extends from water environment governance to comprehensive governance of environment, people’s livelihood and economic upgrading. Erhaigovernance implies power tension and conflicts of interest. Based on the principles of reasonableness, rationality and legality, local residents, tourism operators and local government play power games and negotiate interests according to the logic of ‘emotion, rationality and law’. Environmental governance in rural tourism should be carried out within the framework of rural and social governance to take care of people’s livelihood and development. The theory of environmental justice can be used to explain the phenomenon of environmental governance and conflicts in rural tourism, and also provides a unique perspective for revealing conflicts of interest and social issues behind environmental governance.

Key words: environmental governance, environmental justice, rural tourism, power game, Dali Erhai Lake

孙九霞, 陈景, 黄秀波. 大理洱海旅游环境治理事件中的主体博弈与权益协商[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(9): 1468-1475.

Sun Jiuxia, Chen Jing, Huang Xiubo. The Bargain Between Subjects and Rights Negotiation in the Tourism Environmental Governance Issue of Erhai in Dali, Yunan Province[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(9): 1468-1475.

图/表 2

表 1

图 1

参考文献 34

[1]	Kaika M. City of flows: Modernity, nature, and the city[M]. New York: Routledge, 2005: 11-25.
[2]	Riemer J W Chippewa spearfishing, lake property owner/anglers, and tourism—A case study of environmental social conflict[J]. Sociological Spectrum, 2004. 24 (1): 43- 70. doi: 10.1080/02732170370229751
[3]	Holden A The environment-tourism nexus: Influence of market ethics[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2009. 36 (3): 373- 389. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2008.10.009
[4]	林烺解决我国旅游环境治理困局的新思路: 旅游环境税[J]. 生态经济, 2016. 32 (4): 132- 138. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4407.2016.04.028
	Lin Liang New ideas to solve the dilemma of China’s tourism environmental governance: Tourism environmental tax[J]. Ecological Economy, 2016. 32 (4): 132- 138. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4407.2016.04.028
[5]	俞海滨基于复合生态管理的旅游环境治理范式及其实现路径[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2011. (10): 91- 96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2154.2011.10.012
	Yu Haibin The paradigm and enforcement of tourism environmental governance: Based on integrative eco-management[J]. Journal of Business Economics, 2011. (10): 91- 96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2154.2011.10.012
[6]	王维艳地役权视阈下湖滨旅游开发补偿机制研究——以大理洱海为例[J]. 云南地理环境研究, 2017. 29 (2): 1- 8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7852.2017.02.001
	Wang Weiyan Research on compensation mechanism of lakeside tourism development from the perspective of easement: Taking Erhai Lake in Dali as the example[J]. Yunnan Geographic Environment Research, 2017. 29 (2): 1- 8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7852.2017.02.001
[7]	杨学儒, 李浩铭乡村旅游企业社区参与和环境行为——粤皖两省家庭农家乐创业者的实证研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2019. 22 (1): 78- 88.
	Yang Xueru, Li Haoming Corporate community involvement of rural tourism enterprises and environmental behavior: An empirical research on family entrepreneurs of farmhouses in Guangdong and Anhui Province[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2019. 22 (1): 78- 88.
[8]	赵闯, 黄粹环境冲突与集群行为——环境群体性冲突的社会政治分析[J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 2014. 14 (5): 86- 100.
	Zhao Chuang, Huang Cui Environment conflict and cluster behavior: Social political analysis of environmental group conflict[J]. Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Science Edition), 2014. 14 (5): 86- 100.
[9]	张保伟利益、价值与认知视域下的环境冲突及其伦理调适[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2013. 23 (8): 154- 159. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2013.08.022
	Zhang Baowei Environmental conflict from the perspectives of interest, value and cognitive and its ethical adaptation[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013. 23 (8): 154- 159. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2013.08.022
[10]	约翰·罗尔斯. 正义论[M]. 何怀宏,等译. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2003: 7.
	John Rawls. A theory of justice. Translated by He Huaihong et al. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2003: 7.
[11]	叶超空间正义与新型城镇化研究的方法论[J]. 地理研究, 2019. 38 (1): 148- 156.
	Ye Chao The methodology on spatial justice and new-type urbanization[J]. Geographical Research, 2019. 38 (1): 148- 156.
[12]	王伯承民族村落生态经济的环境正义考量: 一个新的视角[J]. 贵州民族研究, 2016. (4): 131- 136.
	Wang Baicheng Environmental justice considerations on the ecological economy of the ethnic villages: A new perspective[J]. Guizhou Ethnic Studies, 2016. (4): 131- 136.
[13]	Wenz P S. Environmental justice[M]. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988.
[14]	Bryant B. Environmental justice: Issues, policies, and solutions[M]. Washington, D. C: Island Press, 1995: 6.
[15]	何艳玲对“别在我家后院”的制度化回应探析——城镇化中的“邻避冲突”与“环境正义”[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2014. (6): 56- 61.
	He Yanling Analysis of the institutional response to "not in my backyard"—The "NIMBY conflict" and "environmental justice" in urbanization[J]. Frontiers, 2014. (6): 56- 61.
[16]	王韬洋西方环境正义研究述评[J]. 道德与文明, 2010. (1): 126- 129.
	Wang Taoyang Review of environmental justice research in the west[J]. Morality and Civilization, 2010. (1): 126- 129.
[17]	朱力, 龙永红中国环境正义问题的凸显与调控[J]. 南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学), 2012. 49 (1): 48- 54.
	Zhu Li, Long Yonghong Environmental justice in China: Problems and solutions[J]. Journal of Nanjing University (Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences), 2012. 49 (1): 48- 54.
[18]	Bullard R D. Confronting environmental racism: Voices from the grassroots[M]. Boston: South End Press, 1993.
[19]	Schlosberg D. Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements and nature[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007: 3-45.
[20]	杨桂华, 张一群旅游生态不正义及其纠正[J]. 思想战线, 2012. 38 (3): 112- 115. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-778X.2012.03.023
	Yang Guihua, Zhang Yiqun Tourism ecological injustice and its correction[J]. Thinking, 2012. 38 (3): 112- 115. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-778X.2012.03.023
[21]	Bullard R D. Dumping in dixie: Race, class, and environmental quality[M]. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1990.
[22]	Sharma-wallace L Toward an environmental justice of the rural-urban interface[J]. Geoforum, 2016. 77, 174- 177. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.11.002
[23]	Schnegg M, Kiaka R D Subsidized elephants: Community-based resource governance and environmental (in)justice in Namibia[J]. Geoforum, 2018. 93, 105- 115. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.05.010
[24]	张香菊, 张康旭, 张红喜乡村振兴背景下乡村旅游环境正义实现途径[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019. 40 (11): 297- 302.
	Zhang Xiangju, Zhang Kangxu, Zhang Hongxi The realization approaches of environmental justice in rural tourism against the background of rural revitalization[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2019. 40 (11): 297- 302.
[25]	丁金华, 薛姜婷基于环境正义的乡村生态规划策略[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018. 46 (21): 290- 296.
	Ding Jinhua, Xue Jiangting Rural ecological planning strategy based on environmental justice[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2018. 46 (21): 290- 296.
[26]	周永博, 沙润, 梁幸平乡村旅游发展中的社会分化与整合——环境伦理视野下的西部农村实证研究[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2010. (2): 67- 75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2154.2010.02.010
	Zhou Yongbo, Sha Run, Liang Xingping The Social differentiation and integration in rural tourism development—An empirical study of western rural areas in China from the perspective of environmental ethics[J]. Journal of Business Economics, 2010. (2): 67- 75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2154.2010.02.010
[27]	中国财政科学研究院调研组云南大理洱海环湖截污治理(PPP)项目的运作模式与启示[J]. 财政科学, 2017. (10): 130- 134. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1391.2017.10.013
	The Investigation Research Group, Chinese Academy of Fiscal Science (PPP) Operation model and its reference—Based on the Ehai around lake sewage interception governance project located in Dali Yunnan Province[J]. Fiscal Science, 2017. (10): 130- 134. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1391.2017.10.013
[28]	陈小华, 钱晓雍, 李小平, 等洱海富营养化时间演变特征(1988-2013年)及社会经济驱动分析[J]. 湖泊科学, 2018. 30 (1): 70- 78. doi: 10.18307/2018.0107
	Chen Xiaohua, Qian Xiaoyong, Li Xiaoping et al Long-term trend of eutrophication state of Lake Erhai in 1988-2013 and analyses of its socio-economic drivers[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2018. 30 (1): 70- 78. doi: 10.18307/2018.0107
[29]	孙九霞, 刘相军生计方式变迁对民族旅游村寨自然环境的影响——以雨崩村为例[J]. 广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015. 37 (3): 78- 85.
	Sun Jiuxia, Liu Xiangjun Influence of changes in livelihood means on the natural environment of the ethnic tourist villages—Antourism anthropological investigation of Yubeng Village[J]. Journal of Guangxi University for Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2015. 37 (3): 78- 85.
[30]	孙九霞, 黄秀波民族旅游地社区参与中的空间协商与利益博弈——以丽江白沙村为例[J]. 广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017. 39 (2): 40- 48.
	Sun Jiuxia, Huang Xiubo Competing interests and spatial negotiation in ethnic tourism community: A case study of Baisha Village in Lijiang City[J]. Journal of Guangxi University for Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2017. 39 (2): 40- 48.
[31]	孙九霞, 黄凯洁乡村文化精英对旅游发展话语的响应——基于安顺屯堡周官村的研究[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版), 2019. 40 (3): 27- 33.
	Sun Jiuxia, Huang Kaijie The response of rural cultural elites to the discourse of tourism development: Research based on Zhouguan Village of Anshun Tunpu[J]. Journal of Southwest Minzu University(Humanities and Social Science), 2019. 40 (3): 27- 33.
[32]	Ioppolo G, Saija G, Salomone R From coastal management to environmental management: The sustainable eco-tourism program for the mid-western coast of Sardinia (Italy)[J]. Land Use Policy, 2013. 31, 460- 471. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.08.010
[33]	Wongthong P, Harvey N Integrated coastal management and sustainable tourism: A case study of the reef-based SCUBA dive industry from Thailand[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2014. 95, 138- 146.
[34]	Holifield R Environmental justice as recognition and participation in risk assessment: Negotiating and translating health risk at a superfund site in Indian Country[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2012. 102 (3): 591- 613. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2011.641892

编号	性别	年龄	来源地	职业/身份	编号	性别	年龄	来源地	职业/身份
F01	女	约40	大理鹤庆	甜品店老板	L01	女	28	大理双廊	客栈前台
F02	男	35	重庆	餐馆老板	L02	男	55	大理双廊	零工
F03	男	31	上海	客栈老板	L03	男	39	大理双廊	木匠师傅
F04	女	26	江苏	客栈管家	L04	男	28	大理双廊	客栈老板
F05	男	约40	广东广州	客栈老板	L05	男	42	大理双廊	饭店老板
F06	女	45	湖南长沙	客栈管家	L06	男	25	大理双廊	客栈负责人
F07	男	约30	河北	客栈老板	L07	女	约30	大理双廊	客栈老板
F08	男	约50	云南昆明	客栈协会会长	L08	男	约40	大理双廊	饭庄老板
F09	男	约35	大理洱源	餐饮协会副会长	L09	男	56	大理双廊	退伍军人
F10	女	40	海南	客栈管家	L10	男	约45	大理双廊	客栈老板
F11	女	32	重庆	客栈店长	L11	男	约35	大理双廊	饭店老板
F12	男	45	广东广州	客栈老板	L12	男	89	大理双廊	艺术家
F13	男	约35	四川	客栈老板	L13	女	24	大理双廊	客栈店长
F14	男	约45	四川	大理川能旅游公司建设部部长	L14	男	约45	大理双廊	原双廊村玉几岛组长
F15	女	约37	广东佛山	客栈老板	L15	男	45	大理双廊	客栈老板
G01	男	约40	吉林长春	管委会副主任	L16	女	40	大理双廊	客栈店长
G02	男	约35	大理下关	双廊副镇长	L17	女	50	大理双廊	停车场经营者
G03	女	约30	大理下关	文化站宣传员	G05	男	约50	大理双廊	村委会主任
G04	女	25	大理双廊	客栈协会员工

大理洱海旅游环境治理事件中的主体博弈与权益协商

The Bargain Between Subjects and Rights Negotiation in the Tourism Environmental Governance Issue of Erhai in Dali, Yunan Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 2

参考文献 34

相关文章 13

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	程豪, 杨钊. 从大众旅游到乡村旅居:乡村区域旅游发展的新趋势——基于元方法的驱动力分析与旅居地假设[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 83-91.
[2]	吴吉林, 刘帅, 刘水良, 谢文海, 姚春桂. 张家界农户乡村旅游脆弱性评价与影响因素[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8): 1336-1344.
[3]	董文静, 王昌森, 张震. 山东省乡村振兴与乡村旅游时空耦合研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(4): 628-636.
[4]	樊立惠, 王鹏飞, 王成, 范艺娜. 中国农村空间商品化与乡村重构及其研究展望[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(2): 316-324.
[5]	刘美新, 蔡晓梅, 麻国庆. 乡村民宿“家”的生产过程与权力博弈:广东惠州上良村案例[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(12): 1884-1893.
[6]	张环宙, 李秋成, 黄祖辉. 亲缘网络对农民乡村旅游创业意愿的影响——基于浙江浦江农户样本实证[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(11): 1787-1795.
[7]	王文辉, 白冰, 张茵. 相对剥夺视角下的乡村旅游地居民不规范行为研究——以江西婺源县李坑、思溪为例[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(11): 1814-1821.
[8]	王新越,朱文亮. 山东省乡村旅游竞争力评价与障碍因素分析[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(1): 147-155.
[9]	吴吉林, 周春山, 谢文海. 传统村落农户乡村旅游适应性评价与影响因素研究——基于湘西州6个村落的调查[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(5): 755-763.
[10]	李巍, 赵敏, 严江平, 赵雪雁. 基于空间互动模型的兰州市乡村旅游网络中心性分析[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(7): 1059-1068.
[11]	李伯华, 刘沛林, 窦银娣, 王鹏. 景区边缘型乡村旅游地人居环境演变特征及影响机制研究——以大南岳旅游圈为例[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(11): 1353-1360.
[12]	谢莉, 杨载田. 南岳衡山景区周边古镇乡村旅游开发探索[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(5): 627-633.
[13]	吴必虎, 黄琢玮, 马小萌. 中国城市周边乡村旅游地空间结构[J]. 地理科学, 2004, 24(6): 757-763.