扩散性危机影响下公众心理韧性空间特征初探

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.11.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

当前危机管理研究多从公共管理、社会学和心理学等角度揭示恐慌发生的规律，鲜有研究揭示其地理时空特征。因此，从地理学的视角出发，利用百度搜索指数，探索公众恐慌心理的基本空间结构和变动特征，并尝试捕捉心理韧性的空间影响因素。主要得到3点结论：① 在当前互联网高度通达的背景下，危机信息传播速度极快，由此引发的恐慌情绪已无明显空间扩散过程，而是瞬时传播至全国范围，且未出现明显的信息盲区；② 距危机发生地的距离显著影响公众心理韧性，随着距离的增加，公众面对危机的恐慌心理没有呈现出距离衰减的空间规律，也不完全符合“心理台风眼”假说，而是呈现出以疫情较严重的地区为多个中心的涟漪状起伏的圈层结构，恐慌波动指数（PR Index）在1.112~1.947变动；③ 公众恐慌心理对危机信息的韧性差异，受信息类型和空间距离交互影响，表现为紊流状的空间异质结构。建议未来危机信息管理需要重视政策措施的空间区划，根据与危机发生地的空间关系，来决定重点发布何种信息，从而最大效度地减少公众恐慌。

关键词: 扩散性危机, 恐慌心理, 空间涟漪, 空间紊流, 心理韧性

Abstract:

The outbreak of COVID-19 in late 2019 causes grave losses to life and property of Chinese, and also lead to many public panics. How to reduce panic in the process of epidemic prevention is a major challenge for crisis management departments and the public. Current researches mostly reveal the mechanism from the perspective of public management, sociology and psychology, whereas the geographical perspective is absent. Such a theoretical gap cannot support the spatial management of crisis information under the macro scale. Therefore, this paper aims to reveal the spatial structure and changing characteristics of public panic psychology, as well as the regional differences and influencing factors of psychological resilience. This paper uses Baidu search index of keywords related to the COVID-19 during the epidemic period, which are divided into four categories according to whether they are the direct impact of the epidemic, and explores the spatial structure and variation characteristic of public panic psychology. In this paper, the average of the daily fluctuation of the search index, namely the average of the change degree of the search index, was finally adopted, which is called the PR (Panic Ripple) index, to measure the panic degree of the people in all provinces (municipalities and autonomous regions). Secondly, in this paper, the linear distance of each province from the crisis core area is taken as the x-coordinate, and the PR index is taken as the y-coordinate to make a scatter plot, and then Matlab software is used to conduct smooth spline fitting so as to obtain the spatial influencing factors of mental resilience. The research findings are: 1) with highly accessible Internet, crisis information spreads so fast that there is no obvious spatial diffusion process, but is simultaneously spreading to the whole country. There is no obvious information blind spot; 2) With the increase of distance, the public’s panic psychology does not show the spatial law of distance decrease or increase, nor does it fully follow the “psychological typhoon eye” hypothesis. Instead, it presents a ripple and undulating circle structure with severe epidemic situation, like Wuhan as the center, and the resilience index fluctuates between 1.112 and 1.947; 3) The resilience of public panic psychology to crisis information is varied according to different types of information and spatial distance. This incurs a spatial turbulence effect that results in a heterogenous spatial structure of the panic. This study reveals the basic spatial structure of psychological resilience under diffusive crisis from a geographical perspective. The advice given in this paper is that future crisis management should pay crucial attention to spatial zoning when implementing relevant policies according to the spatial relationship with the crisis core area, so as to minimize the validity of public panic.

Key words: diffusive crisis, panic psychology, panic ripple, spatial turbulence, psychological resilience

中图分类号:

K909

刘逸, 孟令坤, 曹轶涵, 谢芷莹. 扩散性危机影响下公众心理韧性空间特征初探[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(11): 1763-1773.

Liu Yi, Meng Lingkun, Cao Yihan, Xie Zhiying. Exploring the Characters of Public Psychological Resilience Under Diffusive Crisis[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2020, 40(11): 1763-1773.

图/表 8

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 35

[1]	人人健康. 一百年前的东北鼠疫[J]. 人人健康, 2011(22): 24-25.
	Health for Everyone. Health for everyone plague in Northeast China 100 years ago. Health for Everyone, 2011(22): 24-25.
[2]	蓝燕, 刘县书. 中国内地抗非典大事记[N]. 中国青年报, 2003-06-25.
	Lan Yan, Liu Xianshu. Events of Anti-SARS in mainland China. China Youth Daily, 2003-06-25.
[3]	陈涛. 目前日本福岛核电站事故不会影响我国环境及境内公众健康[N]. 中国政府网, 2011-03-25.
	Chen Tao. At present, the accident at Japan's Fukushima nuclear power plant will not affect the environment and public health in China. Govnet of China, 2011-03-25.
[4]	丁香园·丁香医生. 截至8月11日15时新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情最新情况. [EB/OL]. 2020-09-27. https://ncov.dxy.cn/ncovh5/view/pneumonia?from=timeline&isappinstalled=0.
	DX Doctor. Update on COVID-19 epidemic as of 15: 00 on August11. https://ncov.dxy.cn/ncovh5/view/pneumonia?from=timeline&isappinstalled=0. 2020-09-27.
[5]	廖灿亮. 战胜恐慌: 重大突发公共卫生事件舆论引导[N]. 人民网, 2020-05-12.
	Liao Canliang. Overcoming Panic: Guidance of public opinion on major public health emergencies. People’s Daily Online, 2020-05-12.
[6]	魏玖长, 赵定涛. 危机信息的传播模式与影响因素研究[J]. 情报科学, 2006, 24(12): 1782-1785.
	Wei Jiuchang, Zhao Dingtao. Research on the crisis information communication model and its impact factors. Information Science, 2006, 24(12): 1782-1785.
[7]	Kilgo D K, Yoo J, Johnson T J. Spreading Ebola panic: Newspaper and social media coverage of the 2014 Ebola health crisis[J]. Health Communication, 2019, 34(8): 811-817. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1437524
[8]	Yuen K F, Wang X, Ma F et al. The psychological causes of panic buying following a health crisis[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(10): 3513 doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103513
[9]	Huo L, Lin T, Huang P. Dynamical behavior of a rumor transmission model with psychological effect in emergency event[J]. Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2013(2013): 4339-4344.
[10]	Dalrymple K E, Young R, Tully M. ‘Facts, Not Fear’: Negotiating uncertainty on social media during the 2014 Ebola crisis[J]. Science Communication, 2016, 38(4): 442-467. doi: 10.1177/1075547016655546
[11]	Brashers D E. Communication and uncertainty management[J]. Journal of Communication, 2001, 51(3): 477-497. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02892.x
[12]	Renn O. Risk communication: Insights and requirements for designing successful communication programs on health communication programs on health and environmental hazards[C]//Heath R L, O’Hair H D. Handbook of risk and crisis communication. New York: Routledge, 2009: 80-98.
[13]	张成福. 公共危机管理: 全面整合的模式与中国的战略选择[J]. 中国行政管理, 2003, 18(7): 5-10.
	Zhang Chengfu. Public crisis management: Comprehensive integration model and China's strategic choice. Chinese Public Administration, 2003, 18(7): 5-10.
[14]	赵路平. 公共危机传播中的政府、媒体、公众关系研究[D]. 上海: 复旦大学, 2007.
	Zhao Luping. A study on the relationship between government, media and public in the communication of public crisis. Shanghai: Fudan University, 2007.
[15]	史波. 移动互联网环境下公共危机信息传播行为的影响因素研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2013, 32(6): 14-18.
	Shi Bo. The influencing factors of public crisis information dissemination behavior under mobile internet environment. Journal of Intelligence, 2013, 32(6): 14-18.
[16]	廖卫民. 社会恐慌的传播机制与治理对策研究——基于谣“盐”风波的理论分析[J]. 当代传播, 2011(3): 50-53.
	Liao Weimin. Study on the spreading mechanism of social panic and its countermeasures—Based on the theoretical analysis of “salt” wave. Contemporary Communications, 2011(3): 50-53.
[17]	禹卫华. 从手机谣言到恐慌行为: 影响因素与社会控制——基于第三人效果框架的历时研究[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2011, 18(6): 57-64+110.
	Yu Weihua. The cellphone rumor, panic behavior, mechanism of Generation and the social control: The diachronic perspectives under the frame of Third Person Effect. Journalism & Communication, 2011, 18(6): 57-64+110.
[18]	苏斌原, 叶苑秀, 张卫, 等. 新冠肺炎疫情不同时间进程下民众的心理应激反应特征[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(3): 79-94.
	Su Binyuan, Ye Yuanxiu, Zhang Wei et al. Psychological stress response characteristics of people in different stages of COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of South China Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2020(3): 79-94.
[19]	方鹏, 史康, 朱霞, 等. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情中民众心态特点分析[J]. 传染病信息, 2020, 33(1): 30-35.
	Fang Peng, Shi Kang, Zhu Xia et al. Analysis on psychological characteristics of the public in the epidemic of COVID-19. Infectious Disease Information, 2020, 33(1): 30-35.
[20]	魏娜, 杨灿, 王晓珍. 重大突发公共危机事件中政府信息发布对公众心理的影响——基于COVID-19疫情的数据分析[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2020, 40(3): 10-22+241.
	Wei Na, Yang Can, Wang Xiaozhen. Impact of government information release on public psychology in major public crisis emergencies—Data analysis based on COVID-19 outbreak. Jiangsu Social Sciences, 2020, 40(3): 10-22+241.
[21]	何高奇, 边晓晖, 孙菲, 等. 基于传染病机制的突发事件下群体情绪感染模型[J]. 华东理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 44(6): 909-917+949.
	He Gaoqi, Bian Xiaohui, Sun Fei et al. Crowd emotional contagion model based on the epidemic mechanism under emergencies. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology, 2018, 44(6): 909-917+949.
[22]	陈卫明, 周豪洁, 张奕莹, 等. 基于传染病模型的恐慌情绪研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2019, 39(4): 629-636.
	Chen Weiming, Zhou Haojie, Zhang Yiying et al. Study on panic based on an epidemic model. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2019, 39(4): 629-636.
[23]	田晓睿, 王丹琛, 董安邦. 心理应激影响下公共危机信息传播机制研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(2): 59-65.
	Tian Xiaorui, Wang Danchen, Dong Anbang. Research on dissemination mechanism of public crisis information under the influence of psychological stress. Library and Information Service, 2014, 58(2): 59-65.
[24]	谢晓非, 郑蕊, 谢冬梅, 等. SARS中的心理恐慌现象分析[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2005(4): 628-639.
	Xie Xiaofei, Zheng Rui, Xie Dongmei et al. Analysis on psychological panic phenomenon of SARS. Acta Scicentiarum Naturalum Universitis Pekinesis, 2005(4): 628-639
[25]	李志宏, 何济乐, 吴鹏飞. 突发性公共危机信息传播模式的时段性特征及管理对策[J]. 图书情报工作, 2007, 51(10): 88-91+99.
	Li Zhihong, He Jile, Wu Pengfei. The time period characteristic of information communication model and it's management strategies of paroxysmal public crisis. Library and Information Service, 2007, 51(10): 88-91+99.
[26]	Huang Y L, Starbird K, Orand M et al. Connected through crisis: Emotional proximity and the spread of misinformation online[C]. Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing. Vancouver, B C. Canada: Association for Computing Machinery,2015:969-980
[27]	Holmes B J. Communicating about emerging infectious disease: The importance of research[J]. Health Risk & Society, 2008, 10(4): 349-360.
[28]	Holmes B J, Henrich N, Hancock S et al. Communicating with the public during health crises: Experts' experiences and opinions[J]. Journal of Risk Research, 2009, 12(6): 793-807. doi: 10.1080/13669870802648486
[29]	Sandman P M. Avoiding overconfidence in uncertain situations[EB/OL]. 2004. http://www.psandman.com/handouts/AIHA/page16.pdf.
[30]	Guedeney C, Mendel G. L'angoisseatomique et les centralesnucléaires: Contribution psychanalytique et sociopsychanalytique à l’étude d’un phenomena collecti [M]. Paris: Payot, 1973.
[31]	李薇. 对“非典恐慌”事件的社会学思考[J]. 学海, 2003(4): 176-179.
	Li Wei. Sociological thinking on the “SARS panic” event. Journal of Xuehai, 2003(4): 176-179.
[32]	李纾, 刘欢, 白新文, 等. 汶川“5.12”地震中的“心理台风眼”效应[J]. 科技导报, 2009, 27(3): 87-89.
	Li Shu, Liu Huan, Bai Xinwen et al. Psychological typhoon eye in 2008 Wenchuan earthquake of May 12. Science & Technology Review, 2009, 27(3): 87-89.
[33]	谢佳秋, 谢晓非, 甘怡群. 汶川地震中的心理台风眼效应[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 47(5): 944-952.
	Xie Jiaqiu, Xie Xiaofei, Gan Yiqun. Psychological typhoon eye effect in the Wenchuan earthquake. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2011, 47(5): 944-952.
[34]	李海垒, 张文新. 心理韧性研究综述[J]. 山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2006, 50(3): 149-152.
	Li Hailei, Zhang Wenxin. A review of psychological resilience. Journal of Shandong Teachers' University(Humanities and Social Sciences), 2006, 50(3): 149-152.
[35]	大卫·哈维. 后现代的状况——对文化变迁之缘起的探究[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2003: 46.
	David Harvey. Postmodern conditions—An inquiry into the causes of cultural change. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2003: 46.

影响类型	恐慌类别	词组	叠加关键词
直接影响	疫情恐慌	1	肺炎、新型冠状病毒、疫情
	防护恐慌	2	口罩、n95、医用外科口罩
	防护恐慌	3	酒精、消毒液、洗手
间接影响	药物恐慌	4	板蓝根、板蓝根颗粒、板蓝根冲剂
		5	维C、维生素C
		6	达菲、奥司他韦
		7	双黄连、双黄连口服液
	形势恐慌	8	“封城”、封路
		9	抢盐、抢盐事件、抢米
		10	蔬菜价格、物价