镇域传统产业集群创新网络演进特征及形成机理——以安徽高沟镇电缆产业为例

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.06.013

地理科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 1039-1049.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.06.013

镇域传统产业集群创新网络演进特征及形成机理——以安徽高沟镇电缆产业为例

李俊峰¹(), 柏晶菁¹, 王淑婧¹^,²

1.安徽师范大学地理与旅游学院，安徽芜湖 241000
2.山东工商学院国际商学院，山东烟台 264000

收稿日期:2020-05-09 修回日期:2020-08-12 接受日期:2020-08-12 出版日期:2021-06-10 发布日期:2021-08-13
作者简介:李俊峰（1974-），男，安徽庐江人，教授，博导，主要从事城市地理和城市规划研究。E-mail： ljf2009@mail.ahnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(41671164);国家自然科学基金(41801154);国家自然科学基金(41901193)

Evolution Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Innovation Network of Township Cable Industry Cluster: A Case Study of Gaogou Town in Anhui

Li Junfeng¹(), Bai Jingjing¹, Wang Shujing¹^,²

1. College of Geography and Tourism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241003, Anhui, China
2. International Business College, Shandong Institute of Business and Technology, Yantai 264000, Shandong, China

Received:2020-05-09 Revised:2020-08-12 Accepted:2020-08-12 Online:2021-06-10 Published:2021-08-13
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41671164);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41801154);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41901193)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于专利合作数据和实地调研数据，借助UCINET对安徽高沟镇电缆产业集群创新网络进行量化分析，揭示镇域传统产业集群创新网络的构成与演化特征，并运用多维邻近性理论探究其演化机理。研究表明：① 产业集群创新网络是由网络主体、网络联结和网络结构三大要素构成，要素之间相互联系、协同发展；② 镇域传统产业集群创新网络形成时间久，经历了初生期、结成期和发展期3个阶段，创新主体由单一转向多元、联结方式由非正式转向正式、联结强度由弱变强、联结结构由星型转向网状；③ 受地理位置、产业性质及经济基础的限制，地理邻近在镇域传统产业集群创新网络形成中具有重要作用；认知邻近存在滞后性，且其作用发挥一定程度上受到地理邻近制约；由于镇域传统产业集群自我创新能力较弱，创新网络对政府及合作组织的依赖性更强，制度邻近及组织邻近作用有待进一步凸显。

关键词: 创新网络, 多维邻近性, 电缆产业集群, 高沟镇

Abstract:

Due to the lack of advanced technology and talent innovation elements, the evolution process and formation mechanism of industrial cluster innovation network in underdeveloped areas vary a lot from those in economically developed areas. How to break through the bottleneck restrictions of talent and technology and how to scientifically build its innovation network become to be very critical in the process of high-quality transformation. In order to enrich the research content and paradigm of traditional industrial cluster innovation network, as well as provide a theoretical basis for local governments in underdeveloped areas to enhance the development of cluster innovation, this article takes Gaogou Town in Anhui Province, a national cable town in underdeveloped areas has been selected as a case, and takes the traditional cable industry cluster has been taken as the object for this research. Based on patent cooperation and field survey data, with the help of UCINET, a quantitative analysis of the innovation network of the Gaogou cable industry cluster is carried out in this article to reveal the composition and evolution characteristics of the innovation network, and to explore its evolution mechanism as well from the perspective of multidimensional proximity theory. The research shows that: 1) The innovation network of industrial clusters is composed of three major elements; network main body, network connection and network structure, which are interrelated and develop synergistically; 2) the innovation network of traditional industry cluster in towns area has been formed for a long time, and has experienced the initial stage, networking stage and development stage. During above the period, the innovation subject changed from single to diversified, the mode of connection turned from informal to formal, the strength of connection grew from weak to strong, and the connection structure developed from sporadic sites to network. 3) Due to the limitation of regional scope, industrial nature and economic foundation, geographical proximity plays an important role in the formation of innovation network of traditional industrial clusters in towns; Cognitive proximity is in backward state, and its function is restricted by spatial proximity to a certain extent; The self-innovation ability of traditional industries in towns is quite weak, and the innovation network mainly depends on the government and cooperative organizations, and the role of institutional proximity and organizational proximity needs to be further highlighted.

Key words: innovation network, multidimensional proximity, cable industry cluster, Gaogou town, Anhui

中图分类号:

F129.9

李俊峰, 柏晶菁, 王淑婧. 镇域传统产业集群创新网络演进特征及形成机理——以安徽高沟镇电缆产业为例[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(6): 1039-1049.

Li Junfeng, Bai Jingjing, Wang Shujing. Evolution Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Innovation Network of Township Cable Industry Cluster: A Case Study of Gaogou Town in Anhui[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2021, 41(6): 1039-1049.

图/表 8

图1

图2

图3

表1

高沟镇规上电缆企业创新网络的中心性与密度

时期	类型	企业	绝对度数中心度	相对度数中心度	绝对接近中心度	相对接近中心度	绝对中间中心度	相对中间中心度
注：为保护电缆企业信息，同时能更加方便分析数据，采用代码方式对登录企业进行标记。表中“-”表示孤立企业与其它企业没有关系，无接近中心度。
网络初生期	中心企业	HHTZ	3.000	30.000	71.000	14.085	4.000	8.889
	副中心企业	AHHL	2.000	20.000	72.000	13.889	3.000	6.667
		BSJT	2.000	20.000	73.000	13.699	0.000	0.000
		YAS	2.000	20.000	73.000	13.699	0.000	0.000
	次中心企业	NAN	1.000	10.000	75.000	13.333	0.000	0.000
	孤立企业	HXDL、CFDL、HGQ、HYTZ、X YDL、XKE	0.000	0.000	-	-	0.000	0.000
	网络度数中心性 = 25.56%；中间中心势指数 = 8.22%；网络密度= 0.0909
网络结成期	中心企业	SRDQ	4.000	5.634	4758.000	1.492	4.000	0.161
	中心企业	AHHY	4.000	5.634	4758.000	1.492	4.000	0.161
	副中心企业	DLDR	3.000	4.225	4759.000	1.492	0.000	0.000
	副中心企业	HNDL	3.000	4.225	4759.000	1.492	0.000	0.000
	次中心企业	FUX	1.000	1.408	5041.000	1.408	0.000	0.000
		AHHT	1.000	1.408	5041.000	1.408	0.000	0.000
		XYT	1.000	1.408	5041.000	1.408	0.000	0.000
		AHHYTZ	1.000	1.408	4762.000	1.491	0.000	0.000
		JHDL	1.000	1.408	5041.000	1.408	0.000	0.000
		DYDL	1.000	1.408	4762.000	1.491	0.000	0.000
	孤立企业	AHHL、HDXL、HYDL、KLDL等62家企业	0.000	0.000	-	-	0.000	0.000
	网络度数中心性= 5.39%；中间中心势指数= 0.16%；网络密度= 0.0039
网络发展期	中心企业	AHHY	6.000	8.451	4061.000	1.748	38.000	1.529
		SRDQ	5.000	7.042	4061.000	1.748	36.000	1.449
		HNDL	5.000	7.042	4058.000	1.750	62.000	2.495
		XYT	4.000	5.634	4066.000	1.746	39.000	1.569
	副中心企业	DYDL	3.000	4.225	4070.000	1.744	14.000	0.563
		DLDR	3.000	4.225	4064.000	1.747	0.000	0.000
		FUX	2.000	2.817	4070.000	1.744	14.000	0.563
		XTHY	2.000	2.817	4074.000	1.743	0.000	0.000
		AHHN	2.000	2.817	4074.000	1.743	0.000	0.000
		GHDL	2.000	2.817	4073.000	1.743	0.000	0.000
	次中心企业	HDXL	1.000	1.408	5041.000	1.408	0.000	0.000
		JHDL	1.000	1.408	4084.000	1.738	0.000	0.000
		HXDL	1.000	1.408	4080.000	1.740	0.000	0.000
		LYU	1.000	1.408	4080.000	1.740	0.000	0.000
		ANHL	1.000	1.408	5041.000	1.408	0.000	0.000
		HNHJ	1.000	1.408	5041.000	1.408	0.000	0.000
		AHHYTZ	1.000	1.408	4075.000	1.742	0.000	0.000
		HLXCL	1.000	1.408	5041.000	1.408	0.000	0.000
		AHHT	1.000	1.408	4080.000	1.740	0.000	0.000
		WTDL	1.000	1.408	4084.000	1.738	0.000	0.000
	孤立企业	SWDL、KLDL、XYDL、HLTZ等52家企业	0.000	0.000	-	-	0.000	0.000
	网络度数中心性= 7.81%；中间中心势指数= 2.42%；网络密度= 0.0086

表1

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 28

[1]	Freeman C. Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues[J]. Research Policy, 1991, 20(5): 499-514. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(91)90072-X
[2]	王缉慈. 网络环境: 产业组织创新的崭新形式——兼评我国企业“上规模”的认识误区[J]. 战略与管理, 1997(3): 109-114.
	Wang Jici. Network environment: A new form of industrial organization innovation—Also commenting on the misunderstandings of Chinese enterprises “upgrading to above scale”. Strategy and Management, 1997(3): 109-114.
[3]	盖文启, 王缉慈. 从硅谷的成功看中国高新区的发展[J]. 中国工业经济, 1999(12): 38-42.
	Gai Wenqi, Wang Jici. Viewing the development of China’s high-tech zones from the success of Silicon Valley. China Industrial Economics, 1999(12): 38-42.
[4]	Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. The knowledge-creating company[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
[5]	Balland P A. Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks: Evidence from research and development project with in the Global Navigation Satellite System Industry[J]. Regional Studies, 2011, 46(6): 741-756.
[6]	Aken, J E, Weggeman M P. Managing learning in informal innovation networks: Overcoming the Daphne-dilemma[J]. R&D Management, 2000, 9(30): 24-27.
[7]	Rothwell R. Successful industrial innovation: Critical factors for the 1990’s[J]. R&D Management, 1992, 22(3): 21-24.
[8]	Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78(6): 1360-1380. doi: 10.1086/225469
[9]	Burt R S. Structural holes: The social structure of competition[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.
[10]	Rowley T, Behrens D, Krackhardt D. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(3): 369-386. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<369::AID-SMJ93>3.0.CO;2-M
[11]	Stefan H, 汪涛. 转型期中国科研机构融入国际学术知识网络的动力机制研究[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(9): 1043-1049.
	Stefan H, Wang Tao. Mechanism of integration of Chinese academic knowledge network into global research system during the transition period. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2011, 31(9): 1043-1049.
[12]	邹琳, 曾刚, 司月芳, 等. 创新网络研究进展述评与展望[J]. 人文地理, 2018, 33(4): 7-12+67.
	Zou Lin, Zeng Gang, Si Yuefang et al. Literature review and prospect on innovation network. Human Geography, 2018, 33(4): 7-12+67.
[13]	马海涛. 知识流动空间的城市关系建构与创新网络模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(4): 708-721. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202004004
	Ma Haitao. The theoretical construction and network simulation of intercity innovative relationships in knowledge flow space. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(4): 708-721. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202004004
[14]	吕国庆, 曾刚, 顾娜娜. 经济地理学视角下区域创新网络的研究综述[J]. 经济地理, 2014, 34(2): 1-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8462.2014.02.001
	Lyu Guoqing, Zeng Gang, Gu Nana. Literature review of regional innovation network: An economic geographical perspective. Economic Geography, 2014, 34(2): 1-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8462.2014.02.001
[15]	乔如娟. 广州新塘牛仔服装产业集群创新网络演化研究[D]. 广州: 广州大学, 2018.
	Qiao Rujuan. The evolution study about innovation network of Jeans Garment industry cluster in Xintang, Guangzhou—Based on evolution economic geography view. Guangzhou: Guangzhou University, 2018.
[16]	吕国庆, 曾刚, 郭金龙. 长三角装备制造业产学研创新网络体系的演化分析[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(9): 1051-1059.
	Lyu Guoqing, Zeng Gang, Guo Jinlong. Innovation network system of industry-university-research institute of equipment manufacturing industry in the Changjiang River Delta. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2014, 34(9): 1051-1059.
[17]	杨春白雪, 曹兴, 高远. 新兴技术合作创新网络演化及特征分析[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(7): 20-32.
	Yang Chunbaixue, Cao Xing, Gao Yuan. A research on the evolution path and characteristics of the emerging technology cooperation innovation network. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(7): 20-32.
[18]	汪秀婷. 战略性新兴产业协同创新网络模型及能力动态演化研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2012(11): 51-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6711.2012.11.010
	Wang Xiuting. Research on the model and dynamic evolution capability of collaborative innovation network for emerging strategic industries. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2012(11): 51-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6711.2012.11.010
[19]	周灿, 曾刚, 尚勇敏. 演化经济地理学视角下创新网络研究进展与展望[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(5): 27-36.
	Zhou Can, Zeng Gang, Shang Yongmin. Progress and prospect of research on innovation networks: A perspective from evolutionary economic geography. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(5): 27-36.
[20]	曹贤忠, 曾刚, 朱贻文. 上海高新技术企业创新结网影响因子实证分析[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(8): 1301-1309.
	Cao Xianzhong, Zeng Gang, Zhu Yiwen. Influencing factors of Shanghai high-tech industry innovation networking. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(8): 1301-1309.
[21]	叶琴, 曾刚. 不同知识基础产业创新网络与创新绩效比较——以中国生物医药产业与节能环保产业为例[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8): 1235-1244.
	Ye Qin, Zeng Gang. The comparison of innovation networks and innovation performance between different knowledge-based industries: Taking China’s biomedical industry and environmental industry as examples. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(8): 1235-1244.
[22]	顾伟男, 刘慧, 王亮. 国外创新网络演化机制研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(12): 1977-1990. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.12.013
	Gu Weinan, Liu Hui, Wang Liang. International research on the evolution mechanisms of innovation networks. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(12): 1977-1990. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.12.013
[23]	马慧, 曹兴, 李星宇. 中部地区新兴技术产业创新网络的协同度研究[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(9): 164-173.
	Ma Hui, Cao Xing, Li xingyu. Synergy degree of innovation network of emerging technology industry in central China. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(9): 164-173.
[24]	刘军. 整体网分析讲义: UCINET软件实用指南[M]. 上海: 格致出版社, 2009.
	Liu Jun. Lectures on whole network approach: A practical guide to UCINET. Shanghai: Truth & Wisdom Press, 2009.
[25]	韩玉刚, 焦华富, 李俊峰. 中国省际边缘区产业集群的网络特征和形成机理——以安徽省宁国市耐磨铸件产业集群为例[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(5): 814-826.
	Han Yugang, Jiao Huafu, Li Junfeng. Mechanism and network characteristics of industrial cluster in provincial border regions of China: A case study of wear-resisting casting industrial cluster in Ningguo of Anhui Province. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(5): 814-826.
[26]	Liu C Y, Yang J C. Decoding patent information using patent maps[J]. Data Science Journal, 2008(7): 14-22.
[27]	Hoekman J, Frenken K, Oort FV. The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe[J]. Annals of Regional Science, 2009, 43(3): 721-738. doi: 10.1007/s00168-008-0252-9
[28]	Boschma RA. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment[J]. Regional Studies, 2005, 39(1): 61-74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887

镇域传统产业集群创新网络演进特征及形成机理——以安徽高沟镇电缆产业为例

Evolution Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Innovation Network of Township Cable Industry Cluster: A Case Study of Gaogou Town in Anhui

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 28

相关文章 12

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王庆喜, 胡志学. 多维邻近下浙江城市创新网络演化及其机制研究[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(8): 1380-1388.
[2]	卓云霞, 刘涛, 古维迎. 多维邻近性与城-城流动人口的流入地选择——基于嵌套Logit模型的实证分析[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(7): 1210-1218.
[3]	叶琴, 曾刚. 不同知识基础产业创新网络与创新绩效比较[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8): 1235-1244.
[4]	刘心怡. 粤港澳大湾区城市创新网络结构与分工研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(6): 874-881.
[5]	马双,曾刚. 网络视角下中国十大城市群区域创新模式研究[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(6): 905-911.
[6]	曹贤忠, 曾刚, 朱贻文. 上海高新技术企业创新结网影响因子实证分析[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(8): 1301-1309.
[7]	段德忠, 杜德斌, 谌颖, 翟庆华. 中国城市创新网络的时空复杂性及生长机制研究[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(11): 1759-1768.
[8]	叶琴, 曾刚, 杨舒婷, 陈弘挺. 东营石油装备制造业创新网络演化研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(7): 1023-1031.
[9]	周灿, 曾刚, 王丰龙, 司月芳, 宓泽锋. 中国电子信息产业创新网络与创新绩效研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(5): 661-671.
[10]	林兰, 曾刚, 吕国庆. 基于创新“二分法”的中国装备制造业创新网络研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(10): 1469-1477.
[11]	马双, 曾刚, 吕国庆. 基于不同空间尺度的上海市装备制造业创新网络演化分析[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(8): 1155-1164.
[12]	吕国庆, 曾刚, 郭金龙. 长三角装备制造业产学研创新网络体系的演化分析[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(9): 1051-1059.