豫陕鄂交界区县域综合发展水平测度及障碍因子分析

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2022.10.008

地理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 1757-1766.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2022.10.008

豫陕鄂交界区县域综合发展水平测度及障碍因子分析

李许红¹^,²^,³(), 王永生¹(), 刘释疑³

1.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所，北京 100101
2.中国科学院大学，北京 100049
3.中国农业大学土地科学与技术学院，北京 100193

收稿日期:2021-11-16 修回日期:2022-03-20 接受日期:2022-07-16 出版日期:2022-10-10 发布日期:2022-12-06
通讯作者: 王永生 E-mail:lxh137218@163.com;wangys@igsnrr.ac.cn
作者简介:李许红（2000−），男，河南南阳人，博士研究生，主要从事土地利用与乡村振兴研究。E-mail: lixuhong2479@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDA23070301);国家自然科学基金项目(41931293)

Comprehensive Measurement and Obstacle Factor Analysis of County-level Development of Junction Area in Henan-Shaanxi-Hubei

Li Xuhong¹^,²^,³(), Wang Yongsheng¹(), Liu Shiyi³

1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3. College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Received:2021-11-16 Revised:2022-03-20 Accepted:2022-07-16 Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-12-06
Contact: Wang Yongsheng E-mail:lxh137218@163.com;wangys@igsnrr.ac.cn
Supported by:
Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDA23070301);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41931293)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以豫陕鄂交界区为研究对象，测度2000—2017年豫陕鄂交界区县域的综合发展水平，探析其空间分异特征、演化趋势和障碍因素。结果表明：① 2000—2017年，豫陕鄂交界区县域综合发展水平逐步提升，年均增速为6.08%，县域间发展的空间差异逐渐增大；② 县域综合发展水平在空间上呈正相关性，热点显著区呈现由东南部向西南部再向东南部迁移变化特征，冷点显著区在2005年前主要分布在安康市和商洛市，之后主要聚集在南阳市；③ 人文和经济要素为中度和中高障碍水平，资源和环境要素为极低和低障碍水平；随着时间的推移，障碍因子在不同县域空间阻力的分异特征更加显著。④ 豫陕鄂交界区县域发展空间阻力模式可划分为3种类型，其中人文资源要素制约型是主要的空间阻力模式。最后，基于不同空间阻力模式特征解析，提出了分区发展策略。

关键词: 豫陕鄂交界区, 人地系统, 障碍因子, 空间阻力模式, 乡村振兴

Abstract:

Taking the Henan-Shaanxi-Hubei junction area as the research object, this paper measured the comprehensive development level of the counties in the Henan-Shaanxi-Hubei junction area from 2000 to 2017, and analyzed its spatial differentiation characteristics, evolutionary trends and obstacles. The results show that: 1) From 2000 to 2017, the comprehensive development level of the counties in the ??Henan-Shaanxi-Hubei junction area gradually improved, with an average annual growth rate of 6.08%, and the spatial difference between the county-level development gradually increased; 2) The comprehensive development level of counties showed a positive spatial correlation. The significant hotspot areas migrated from the southeast to the southwest and then to the southeast. The significant coldspot areas were mainly distributed in Ankang and Shangluo before 2005, and then mainly concentrated in Nanyang. 3) The humanistic and economic factors are at moderate to high barrier levels, while resources and environmental factors are at extremely low and low barrier levels; with the passage of time, the spatial resistance differentiation of obstacle factors in different counties became more significant. 4) The spatial resistance patterns of county development in the Henan-Shaanxi-Hubei junction area can be divided into 3 types, among which the low economic development level-human resource element restriction type is the main spatial resistance pattern, and on the basis of analyzing the characteristics of different spatial resistance patterns, a regional development strategy is proposed.

Key words: the junction area in Henan-Shaanxi-Hubei, human-land system, obstacle factor, spatial resistance pattern, rural revitalization

中图分类号:

K901.2

李许红, 王永生, 刘释疑. 豫陕鄂交界区县域综合发展水平测度及障碍因子分析[J]. 地理科学, 2022, 42(10): 1757-1766.

Li Xuhong, Wang Yongsheng, Liu Shiyi. Comprehensive Measurement and Obstacle Factor Analysis of County-level Development of Junction Area in Henan-Shaanxi-Hubei[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2022, 42(10): 1757-1766.

图/表 8

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表2

图6

参考文献 32

[1]	王蔷, 丁延武, 郭晓鸣. 我国县域经济高质量发展的指标体系构建[J]. 软科学, 2021, 35(1): 115-119+133.
	Wang Qiang, Ding Yanwu, Guo Xiaoming. Construction of the indicator system of economic high-quality development of counties in China. Soft Science, 2021, 35(1): 115-119+133.
[2]	毛汉英. 县域经济和社会同人口、资源、环境协调发展研究[J]. 地理学报, 1991, 46(4): 385-395. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.1991.04.001
	Mao Hanying. Study on coordinating development of economic, social growth with population, resources and environment at county level. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1991, 46(4): 385-395. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.1991.04.001
[3]	刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 637-650. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
	Liu Yansui. Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 637-650. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
[4]	郭爱君, 毛锦凰. 新时代中国县域经济发展略论[J]. 兰州大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 46(4): 82-89. doi: 10.13885/j.issn.1000-2804.2018.04.009
	Guo Aijun, Mao Jinhuang. China’s county economic development in the new era. Journal of Lanzhou University (Social Sciences), 2018, 46(4): 82-89. doi: 10.13885/j.issn.1000-2804.2018.04.009
[5]	李宁, 李铁滨, 房艳刚, 等. 吉林省县域经济效率时空格局演化研究[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(8): 1293-1301. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.08.011
	Li Ning, Li Tiebin, Fang Yangang et al. Spatiotemporal pattern evolution of economic efficiency in county area of Jilin Province based on malmquist and ESDA. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39(8): 1293-1301. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.08.011
[6]	徐维祥, 刘程军. 产业集群创新与县域城镇化耦合协调的空间格局及驱动力——以浙江为实证[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(11): 1347-1356. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2015.11.001
	Xu Weixiang, Liu Chengjun. The spatial pattern and driving force of innovation of industrial cluster and county urbanization coupled coordination in Zhejiang Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(11): 1347-1356. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2015.11.001
[7]	辛岭, 王济民. 我国县域农业现代化发展水平评价——基于全国1980个县的实证分析[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2014, 35(6): 673-678. doi: 10.13872/j.1000-0275.2014.0054
	Xin Ling, Wang Jimin. Evaluation on agricultural modernization level of China’s counties—Based on empirical analysis of nationwide 1980 counties. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2014, 35(6): 673-678. doi: 10.13872/j.1000-0275.2014.0054
[8]	李瑞, 吴殿廷, 鲍捷, 等. 基于地理学视角的民族县域旅游发展评价研究——以黔东南州所辖民族县域为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2014, 28(1): 189-198. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7578.2014.01.033
	Li Rui, Wu Dianting, Bao Jie et al. Tourism development evaluation of ethnic county based on the geographic perspective—A case of ethnic counties of autonomous prefecture of Southeast Guizhou. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2014, 28(1): 189-198. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7578.2014.01.033
[9]	化祥雨, 金祥荣, 吕海萍, 等. 高质量发展耦合协调时空格局演化及影响因素——以浙江省县域为例[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(2): 223-231.
	Hua Xiangyu, Jin Xiangrong, Lyu Haiping et al. Spatial-temporal pattern evolution and influencing factors of high quality development coupling coordination: Case on counties of Zhejiang Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(2): 223-231.
[10]	史利江, 刘敏, 李艳萍, 等. 汾河流域县域经济差异的时空格局演变及驱动因素[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(10): 2361-2378. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190785
	Shi Lijiang, Liu Min, Li Yanping et al. The spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of economic difference at county level in Fenhe River Basin. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(10): 2361-2378. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190785
[11]	李正昕, 徐维祥, 刘程军. 长三角县域三次产业协调发展的空间特征及动力机制[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(3): 136-143.
	Li Zhengxin, Xu Weixiang, Liu Chengjun. Spatial characteristics and mechanism of the coordinated development of three industries at county level in the Yangtze River Delta. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(3): 136-143.
[12]	宋周莺, 虞洋. 中国边境地区的城镇化可持续发展态势[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(5): 55-64.
	Song Zhouying, Yu Yang. Urbanization sustainable development trend of urbanization in the border areas of China. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(5): 55-64.
[13]	陈钊. 行政边界区域刍论[J]. 人文地理, 1996, 11(4): 45-48. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.1996.04.010
	Chen Zhao. Research of administrative border regions. Human Geography, 1996, 11(4): 45-48. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.1996.04.010
[14]	曾冰. 基于NPP/VIIRS夜间灯光数据的湘鄂赣省际交界区县域经济空间格局及影响因素[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(6): 900-907.
	Zeng Bing. Spatial pattern evolution and influencing factors of county-level economy of border regions in Hunan-Hubei-Jiangxi based on nighttime light data. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(6): 900-907.
[15]	谢宝剑, 刘少楷. 省际边缘区域贫困的整体性治理途径[J]. 行政论坛, 2016, 23(3): 24-28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-460X.2016.03.005
	Xie Baojian, Liu Shaokai. A holistic approach to governance of poverty in inter-provincial marginal regions. Administrative Tribune, 2016, 23(3): 24-28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-460X.2016.03.005
[16]	周扬, 郭远智, 刘彦随. 中国县域贫困综合测度及2020年后减贫瞄准[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1478-1493. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201808007
	Zhou Yang, Guo Yuanzhi, Liu Yansui. Comprehensive measurement of county poverty and anti-poverty targeting after 2020 in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(8): 1478-1493. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201808007
[17]	郭远智, 刘彦随. 中国乡村发展进程与乡村振兴路径[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1408-1421. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106007
	Guo Yuanzhi, Liu Yansui. The process of rural development and paths for rural revitalization in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1408-1421. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106007
[18]	王永生, 文琦, 刘彦随. 贫困地区乡村振兴与精准扶贫有效衔接研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(11): 1840-1847.
	Wang Yongsheng, Wen Qi, Liu Yansui. Achieving effective connection between rural revitalization and targeted poverty alleviation in poverty-stricken regions. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(11): 1840-1847.
[19]	刘彦随. 现代人地关系与人地系统科学[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8): 1221-1234.
	Liu Yansui. Modern human-earth relationship and human-earth system science. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(8): 1221-1234.
[20]	周扬, 郭远智, 刘彦随. 中国乡村地域类型及分区发展途径[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 467-481.
	Zhou Yang, Guo Yuanzhi, Liu Yansui. Areal types and their development paths in rural China. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 467-481.
[21]	刘彦随. 新时代乡村振兴地理学研究[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 461-466.
	Liu Yansui. Research on the geography of rural revitalization in the new era. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 461-466.
[22]	国家统计局. 中国县域统计年鉴(县市卷)[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2001, 2006, 2011, 2018.
	National Bureau of Statistics. China statistical yearbook (county-level). Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2001, 2006, 2011, 2018.
[23]	国家统计局. 中国区域经济统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2006, 2011.
	National Bureau of Statistics. China statistical yearbook for regional economy. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2006, 2011.
[24]	陕西省统计局. 陕西区域统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2016, 2018.
	Shaanxi Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Shaanxi regional statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2016, 2018.
[25]	崔许锋, 张光宏. 城镇用地“经济−社会−生态”绩效空间分异与障碍诊断[J]. 人文地理, 2016, 31(1): 94-101.
	Cui Xufeng, Zhang Guanghong. Spatial differentiation and hindrance diagnosis of urban land use economic-social-ecological performance. Human Geography, 2016, 31(1): 94-101.
[26]	Ord J K, Getis A. Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: Distributional issues and an application[J]. Geographical Analysis, 1995, 27(4): 286-306.
[27]	李颉, 郑步云, 王劲峰. 2008—2018年中国手足口病时空分异特征[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(3): 419-430. doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2021.190778
	Li Jie, Zheng Buyun, Wang Jinfeng. Spatial-temporal heterogeneity of Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease in China from 2008 to 2018. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2021, 23(3): 419-430. doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2021.190778
[28]	赵宏波, 岳丽, 刘雅馨, 等. 高质量发展目标下黄河流域城市居民生活质量的时空格局及障碍因子[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(8): 1303-1313.
	Zhao Hongbo, Yue Li, Liu Yaxin et al. Spatial-temporal pattern and obstacle factors of urban residents’ quality of life in the Yellow River Basin under the background of high-quality development. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(8): 1303-1313.
[29]	刘彦随, 周扬, 李玉恒. 中国乡村地域系统与乡村振兴战略[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2511-2528. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912007
	Liu Yansui, Zhou Yang, Li Yuheng. Rural regional system and rural revitalization strategy in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2511-2528. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201912007
[30]	何龙斌. 省际边缘区“贫困陷阱”的形成与突破——以陕、鄂、川、甘省际边缘区为例[J]. 经济问题探索, 2016(9): 58-64.
	He Longbin. Formation and breakthrough of ‘Poverty Trap’ in interprovincial marginal areas: A case study of the interprovincial marginal areas of Shaanxi, Hubei, Sichuan and Gansu. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2016(9): 58-64.
[31]	杜国明, 刘美, 薛濡壕. 基于多维测度框架的贫困县脱贫质量评价[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(7): 1227-1236.
	Du Guoming, Liu Mei, Xue Ruhao. Evaluation of poverty alleviation quality of poor counties based on multi-dimensional measurement framework. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(7): 1227-1236.
[32]	郭远智, 周扬, 刘彦随. 贫困地区的精准扶贫与乡村振兴: 内在逻辑与实现机制[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(12): 2819-2832. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190644
	Guo Yuanzhi, Zhou Yang, Liu Yansui. Targeted poverty alleviation and rural revitalization in poverty-stricken areas: Internal logic and mechanism. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(12): 2819-2832. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190644

准则层	指标层	单位	指标解释	权重	性质
注：“+”表示正向指标，“−”表示逆向指标；参考文献[20]的研究，将“年均降水量”定义为正向指标。
人文要素	万人在校中学生数（X₁）	人/万人	反映地区教育水平	0.0458	+
	万人医院床位数（X₂）	个/万人	反映医疗保障状况	0.1094	+
	万人福利院床位数（X₃）	个/万人	反映社会福利发展水平	0.1389	+
	人均固定资产投资（X₄）	元/人	反映人均资源投入水平	0.1131	+
经济要素	人均地区生产总值（X₅）	元/人	反映人均经济产出水平	0.1036	+
	二三产业占比（X₆）	%	反映产业结构	0.0218	+
	人均居民储蓄存款（X₇）	元/人	反映人均财富水平	0.0525	+
	万人规模以上工业企业数（X₈）	个/万人	反映工业发展水平	0.0931	+
	人均消费品零售额（X₉）	元/人	反映社会消费水平	0.0817	+
资源要素	年均降水量（X₁₀）	mm	反映水资源丰度	0.0431	+
	人均农林牧渔产值（X₁₁）	元/人	反映农业资源产出水平	0.0383	+
	人均粮食产量（X₁₂）	kg/人	反映粮食保障水平	0.0714	+
环境要素	人均二氧化碳排放量（X₁₃）	t/人	反映温室气体排放水平	0.0215	−
	PM_2.5年均质量浓度（X₁₄）	μg/m³	反映大气污染状况	0.0428	−
	NDVI指数（X₁₅）	无	反映植被覆盖状况	0.0230	+

年份		前7项障碍因子
年份		1	2	3	4	5	6	7
注：变量含义见表1。
2000	障碍因子	X₃	X₄	X₅	X₂	X₈	X₉	X₇
	障碍度/%	15.53	13.44	11.97	11.49	9.86	9.41	6.07
2005	障碍因子	X₃	X₄	X₅	X₂	X₈	X₉	X₁₂
	障碍度/%	15.20	14.00	12.10	12.04	10.09	9.57	6.12
2010	障碍因子	X₄	X₃	X₂	X₅	X₉	X₈	X₁₂
	障碍度/%	14.63	13.34	12.39	11.65	9.28	9.26	6.09
2017	障碍因子	X₃	X₄	X₂	X₅	X₈	X₁₂	X₉
	障碍度/%	15.87	14.27	10.85	9.97	9.64	9.51	6.92

豫陕鄂交界区县域综合发展水平测度及障碍因子分析

Comprehensive Measurement and Obstacle Factor Analysis of County-level Development of Junction Area in Henan-Shaanxi-Hubei

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	佟伟铭, 郭加新, 苏飞, 徐维祥. 乡村振兴背景下人口迁移对乡村转型发展影响的研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学, 2022, 42(4): 662-669.
[2]	武前波, 叶佳钰, 陈玉娟. 乡村振兴背景下东部沿海发达地区乡村性空间格局——以浙江省为例[J]. 地理科学, 2022, 42(3): 466-475.
[3]	王兆峰, 史伟杰. 中国美丽休闲乡村的空间分布特征及影响因素[J]. 地理科学, 2022, 42(1): 104-114.
[4]	赵宏波, 岳丽, 刘雅馨, 董冠鹏, 苗长虹. 高质量发展目标下黄河流域城市居民生活质量的时空格局及障碍因子[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(8): 1303-1313.
[5]	赵书虹, 白梦, 阮梦枝, 钱海燕. 云南省旅游资源与生态安全协调发展的时空演化特征及障碍因子分析[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(3): 493-503.
[6]	李繁荣. 中国乡村振兴与乡村功能优化转型[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(12): 2158-2167.
[7]	徐少癸, 左逸帆, 章牧. 基于模糊物元模型的中国旅游生态安全评价及障碍因子诊断研究[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 33-43.
[8]	刘彦随. 现代人地关系与人地系统科学[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8): 1221-1234.
[9]	屠爽爽, 龙花楼. 乡村聚落空间重构的理论解析[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(4): 509-517.
[10]	叶超, 于洁. 迈向城乡融合:新型城镇化与乡村振兴结合研究的关键与趋势[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(4): 528-534.
[11]	曲衍波. 论乡村聚落转型[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(4): 572-580.
[12]	范建红, 梁肇宏, Steven B Emery. 第二次世界大战后英国乡村景观研究的脉络走向及启示[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(4): 590-598.
[13]	董文静, 王昌森, 张震. 山东省乡村振兴与乡村旅游时空耦合研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(4): 628-636.
[14]	麻学锋, 刘玉林, 谭佳欣. 旅游驱动的乡村振兴实践及发展路径[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(12): 2019-2026.
[15]	王永生, 文琦, 刘彦随. 贫困地区乡村振兴与精准扶贫有效衔接研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(11): 1840-1847.