旅游“网红村”居民的怀旧、集体记忆与地方认同的特征及互动关系——以内蒙古呼和浩特市恼包村为例

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2022.10.012

地理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 1799-1806.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2022.10.012

旅游“网红村”居民的怀旧、集体记忆与地方认同的特征及互动关系——以内蒙古呼和浩特市恼包村为例

李猛¹^,²(), 乌铁红³(), 钟林生¹

1.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所，北京 100101
2.中国科学院大学资源与环境学院，北京 100049
3.内蒙古大学历史与旅游文化学院，内蒙古呼和浩特 010020

收稿日期:2021-12-28 修回日期:2022-03-11 接受日期:2022-07-07 出版日期:2022-10-10 发布日期:2022-12-06
通讯作者: 乌铁红 E-mail:limeng202@mails.ucas.ac.cn;tiehongwu@126.com
作者简介:李猛（1997-），男，蒙古族，内蒙古呼和浩特人，博士研究生，研究方向为旅游地理与国家公园。E-mail： limeng202@mails.ucas.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金项目(20BMZ131);内蒙古自然科学基金项目(2019MS04019)

Characteristics and Interaction of Nostalgia, Collective Memory and Place Identity Among Residents of Online Populartourism Village: A Case of Naobao Villiage of Hohhot, Inner Mongolia

Li Meng¹^,²(), Wu Tiehong³(), Zhong Linsheng¹

1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China
2. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3. College of History and Tourism Culture, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, Inner Mongolia, China

Received:2021-12-28 Revised:2022-03-11 Accepted:2022-07-07 Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-12-06
Contact: Wu Tiehong E-mail:limeng202@mails.ucas.ac.cn;tiehongwu@126.com
Supported by:
National Social Science Foundation of China(20BMZ131);Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia(2019MS04019)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以内蒙古呼和浩特市旅游“网红村”——恼包村为例，通过实验法和问卷调查法，探讨了旅游网红村居民的怀旧、集体记忆与地方认同3种情感的特征。运用结构方程模型，验证了在旅游效应作用下，3种情感之间内在的互动机理。研究显示，在非本地旅游景观融入地方旅游社区的情境下，居民依然非常认同当前的景观与建筑，并对旅游发展保持积极态度；怀旧、集体记忆如果失去了物质载体，会在文化载体上集中表现；旅游景观的嬗变没有隔断居民对从前村落的集体记忆，但旅游景观优化带来的旅游效应削弱了居民的怀旧情感；居民的怀旧与集体记忆呈显著的正向相关关系，居民的集体记忆显著影响地方认同，旅游发展效应对集体记忆与地方认同有显著的正向影响。

关键词: 旅游"网红村", 怀旧, 集体记忆, 地方认同

Abstract:

The emotional sustenance of rural residents is an important reference for the development quality of rural revitalization and rural tourism in China. The evolution of tourism landscape also provides a new perspective for the study of rural residents’ emotion and memory. Taking Huhhot Naobao village in Inner Mongolia as a case, this paper discusses the residents’ nostalgic, collective memory and place identity by means of experiment and questionnaire survey. The structural equation model is used to verify the internal interaction mechanism among the nostalgia, collective memory and place identity of residents in the online populartourism village under the effect of tourism. In the context of the integration of non-indigenous tourism landscape into local tourism communities, the research shows that: Residents still identify with the current landscape and architecture strongly, and maintain a positive attitude towards tourism development; If nostalgia and collective memory lose their material carrier, they will be concentrated on the cultural carrier performance. The evolution of tourism landscape does not cut off residents’ collective memory of former villages, but the tourism effect brought by tourism landscape optimization weakens residents’ nostalgic feelings. Residents’ nostalgia has a significant positive correlation with collective memory, residents’ collective memory has a significant positive impact on place identity, and tourism development has a significant positive impact on collective memory and place identity. This paper provides a theoretical reference for the development model of rural tourism and the reconstruction of rural tourism landscape under the strategy of rural revitalization.

Key words: online populartourism village, nostalgia, collective memory, place identify

中图分类号:

K901.2

李猛, 乌铁红, 钟林生. 旅游“网红村”居民的怀旧、集体记忆与地方认同的特征及互动关系——以内蒙古呼和浩特市恼包村为例[J]. 地理科学, 2022, 42(10): 1799-1806.

Li Meng, Wu Tiehong, Zhong Linsheng. Characteristics and Interaction of Nostalgia, Collective Memory and Place Identity Among Residents of Online Populartourism Village: A Case of Naobao Villiage of Hohhot, Inner Mongolia[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2022, 42(10): 1799-1806.

图/表 5

图1

图2

表1

表2

图3

参考文献 29

[1]	刘阳, 赵振斌, 李小永. 基于PPGIS的乡村旅游社区景观价值变化研究——以丽江束河古镇为例[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(2): 328-339.
	Liu Yang, Zhao Zhenbin, Li Xiaoyong. Landscape value in rural community based on PPGIS: A case study on Shuhe Old Town of Lijiang. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(2): 328-339.
[2]	Vila S J, Rodriguez R, Varga D et al. Stakeholder perceptions of landscape changes in the Mediterranean Mountains of the North-Eastern Iberian Peninsula[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2015, 27(5): 1354-1365.
[3]	Westling E L, Surridg B W J, Sharol et al. Making sense of landscape change: Long-term perceptions among local residents following river restoration[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2014, 519: 2613-2623. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.029
[4]	刘沛林. 新型城镇化建设中“留住乡愁”的理论与实践探索[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(7): 1205-1212.
	Liu Peilin. The theory and practice exploration of ''remembering nostalgia'' in the construction of new urbanization. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(7): 1205-1212.
[5]	孙文秀, 武前波, 陈前虎, 等. 基于景观社会理论的浙江乡村振兴研究——以富阳“网红村”建设为例[J]. 城乡规划, 2020(4): 88-96. doi: 10.12049/j.urp.202004012
	Sun Wenxiu, Wu Qianbo, Chen Qianhu et al. Rural revitalization research in Zhejiang Province based on society of the spectacle theory: A comparative study on three internet-famous villages. Urban & Rural Planning, 2020(4): 88-96. doi: 10.12049/j.urp.202004012
[6]	Batcho K I. Nostalgia: A psychological perspective[J]. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1995, 80: 131-143. doi: 10.2466/pms.1995.80.1.131
[7]	李蕾蕾. “乡愁”的理论化与乡土中国和城市中国的文化遗产保护[J]. 北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2015, 13(4): 51-57.
	Li Leilei. Theorizing “nostalgia” and its implications on cultural heritage preservation of rural and urban China. Journal of Beijing Union University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2015, 13(4): 51-57.
[8]	赵宏杰, 吴必虎. 基于休闲时空涉入的地方认同模型之研究[J]. 旅游学刊, 2017, 32(3): 95-106. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2017.03.015
	Zhao Hongjie, Wu Bihu. A study on place identity model based on the leisure temporal-spatial involvement. Tourism Tribune, 2017, 32(3): 95-106. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2017.03.015
[9]	钱莉莉, 张捷, 郑春晖, 等. 灾难地居民集体记忆、地方认同、地方保护意愿关系研究——以汶川地震北川老县城为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(4): 988-1002. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180016
	Qian Lili, Zhang Jie, Zheng Chunhui et al. The relationships among post-disaster collective memory, place identity and place protection intention of local residents: A case study of Wenchuan earthquake ruined town of Beichuan. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(4): 988-1002. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020180016
[10]	孔翔, 卓方勇. 文化景观对建构地方集体记忆的影响——以徽州呈坎古村为例[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(1): 110-117.
	Kong Xiang, Zhuo Fangyong. Roles of cultural landscapes in the construction of local collective memory: A case study of Chengkan Village. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017, 37(1): 110-117.
[11]	Lasaleta J D, Sedikides C, Vohs K D. Nostalgia weakens the desire for money[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2014, 41(3): 713-729. doi: 10.1086/677227
[12]	Lowenthal D. Past time, present place: Landscape and memory[J]. Geographical Review, 1975, 65(1): 1-36. doi: 10.2307/213831
[13]	Boym S. The future of nostalgia[M]. New York: Basic Books, 2001: 1-404.
[14]	王新歌, 陈田, 林明水, 等. 国内外乡愁相关研究进展及启示[J]. 人文地理, 2018, 33(5): 1-11.
	Wang Xinge, Chen Tian, Lin Mingshui et al. Review of nostalgia research. Human Geography, 2018, 33(5): 1-11.
[15]	Halbwachs M. On collective memory[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992: 124-128.
[16]	赵瑜, 范静涵. 怀旧影片中集体记忆的呈现与建构[J]. 当代电影, 2019(5): 112-115.
	Zhao Yu, Fan Jinghan. Description and construction for the collective memories in nostalgia films. Contemporary Cinema, 2019(5): 112-115.
[17]	Winter C. Tourism, social memory and the great war[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2009, 36(4): 607-626. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2009.05.002
[18]	Stewart S. On Longing: Narratives of the miniature, the gigantic, the souvenir, the collection[J]. Durham, N C: Duke University Press, 1993: 23
[19]	张昱. 作为记忆媒介的博物馆: 对公共事件的叙事与传播[J]. 复旦学报(社会科学版), 2021, 63(3): 97-104.
	Zhang Yu. Museum as a media of memory: The narratives and communication of public events. Fudan Journal (Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 63(3): 97-104.
[20]	Wright J K. Terrae incognitae: The place of imagination in geography[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1947, 37(1): 1-15. doi: 10.1080/00045604709351940
[21]	唐文跃. 地方感研究进展及研究框架[J]. 旅游学刊, 2007, 22(11): 70-77. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2007.11.018
	Tang Wenyue. A study progress of sense of locality and research framework. Tourism Tribune, 2007, 22(11): 70-77. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2007.11.018
[22]	赵宏杰, 吴必虎. 大陆赴台自由行游客地方认同与休闲效益关系研究[J]. 旅游学刊, 2013, 28(12): 54-63.
	Zhao Hongjie, Wu Bihu. A study on the relationship between place identity and leisure benefits for individual visitors from Mainland China to Taiwan. Tourism Tribune, 2013, 28(12): 54-63.
[23]	杨立国, 刘沛林, 林琳. 传统村落景观基因在地方认同建构中的作用效应: 以侗族村寨为例[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(5): 593-598.
	Yang Liguo, Liu Peilin, Lin Lin. The effect of traditional village landscape genes in construction place identity: Taking the Dong Minority village as an example. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(5): 593-598.
[24]	Agnew J. Regions on the mind does not equal regions of the mind[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 1999, 23(1): 91-96. doi: 10.1191/030913299677849788
[25]	Ardakani M K, Oloonabadi S S A. Collective memory as an efficient agent in sustainable urban conservation[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 21(3): 985-988.
[26]	钱莉莉, 张捷, 郑春晖, 等. 地理学视角下的集体记忆研究综述[J]. 人文地理, 2015, 30(6): 7-12. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2015.06.002
	Qian Lili, Zhang Jie, Zheng Chunhui et al. A review of studies on collective memory from the perspective of geography. Human Geography, 2015, 30(6): 7-12. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2015.06.002
[27]	Steven Hoelscher, Derek H. Alderman, memory and place: Geographies of a critical relationship[J]. Social & Cultural Geography, 2004, 5(3): 347-353.
[28]	Gurler E E, Ozer B. The effects of public memorials on social memory and urban identity[J]. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 82: 858-863. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.361
[29]	徐彤, 陈晔, 龙潜颖. 旅游感知与地方依恋对主-客价值共创的影响[J]. 商业研究, 2020(7): 1-7.
	Xu Tong, Chen Ye, Long Qianying. The influence of tourism perception and place attachment on co-creation of host-guest value. Commercial Research, 2020(7): 1-7.

指标	绝对拟合指数				简约拟合指数		相对拟合指数
指标	CMIN/DF	GFI	AGFI	RMR	PGFI	PNFI	CFI	NFI	IFI
注：CMIN/DF为卡方自由度比；GFI为拟合度指数；AGFI为调整后拟合度指数；RMR为残差均方和平根；PGFI为简约拟合指数；PNFI为简约规范适配指标；CFI为比较适配指数；NFI为规范拟合指数；IFI为增量适合度指数。
标准	≤5	＞0.8	＞0.8	＜0.05	＞0.5	＞0.5	＞0.8	＞0.8	＞0.8
模型	3.791	0.839	0.782	0.038	0.619	0.796	0.839	0.796	0.841

作用路径	非标准化估计	S.E	C.R.	标准化估计	P
注：S.E为标准误差；C.R.为临界比值； ^***为P<0.001水平下显著相关；←为变量间的作用路径；↔为变量间的相互作用关系。
怀旧↔集体记忆	0.239	0.036	6.622	0.624	^***
地方认同←怀旧	0.110	0.083	1.333	0.114	0.183
地方认同←集体记忆	0.353	0.073	4.871	0.481	^***
集体记忆←旅游效应	0.579	0.147	3.933	0.322	^***
地方认同←旅游效应	0.280	0.105	2.674	0.212	0.007

旅游“网红村”居民的怀旧、集体记忆与地方认同的特征及互动关系——以内蒙古呼和浩特市恼包村为例

Characteristics and Interaction of Nostalgia, Collective Memory and Place Identity Among Residents of Online Populartourism Village: A Case of Naobao Villiage of Hohhot, Inner Mongolia

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 29

相关文章 5

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	陈昊曦, 袁振杰, 蔡晓梅. 广州法系群体的日常生活与地方认同研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(12): 2027-2036.
[2]	孔翔, 卓方勇. 文化景观对建构地方集体记忆的影响——以徽州呈坎古村为例[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(1): 110-117.
[3]	杨立国, 刘沛林, 林琳. 传统村落景观基因在地方认同建构中的作用效应——以侗族村寨为例[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(5): 593-598.
[4]	蔡晓梅, 刘晨, 朱竑. 大学的怀旧意象及其空间性建构——以中山大学为例[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(6): 710-717.
[5]	杜芳娟, 陈晓亮, 朱竑. 民族文化重构实践中的身份与地方认同——仡佬族祭祖活动案例[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(12): 1512-1517.