中越边境乡村民居景观的符号象征与认同建构——广西龙州县边境乡村案例

doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.04.013

地理科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 595-602.doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.04.013

中越边境乡村民居景观的符号象征与认同建构——广西龙州县边境乡村案例

万蕙¹(), 唐雪琼²()

1.华南农业大学人文与法学院,广东广州 510642
2.西南林业大学园林学院,云南昆明 650224

收稿日期:2016-04-28 修回日期:2016-08-10 出版日期:2017-04-25 发布日期:2017-04-25
作者简介:
作者简介：万蕙（1982-）,女,湖北武汉人,博士,讲师,主要从事女性主义地理学研究。E-mail: mamhei82@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41401135, 41261031, 41401136) 资助

The Symbolism and the Identity Construction of French-decorated Folk Houses Landscape on the Sino-Vietnamese Borderland in Longzhou, Guangxi Province

Hui Wan¹(), Xueqiong Tang²()

1.School of Humanities and Law, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China
2.School of Landscape, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, Yunnan, China

Received:2016-04-28 Revised:2016-08-10 Online:2017-04-25 Published:2017-04-25
Supported by:
National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (41401135, 41261031, 41401136)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以广西龙州县边境乡村的法式民居景观为例,从历史的角度分析法式民居景观兴盛的缘由,并探讨其象征意义及认同建构。研究发现,法式民居景观作为承载文化意义的符号,是财富和社会地位的象征;又因其宫殿式形态,成为当地人幻想更大权欲以获得自我满足的源泉。此外,法式民居景观强化了当地村民对自身身份的认同建构,并唤起了他们对历史的缅怀、对家的归属感和对地方的认同感。研究既是对新文化地理学关于景观研究向社会文化意义转向的例证,也是对新文化地理学中关于地方、景观与认同关系研究的回应。

关键词: 民居, 符号象征, 认同建构, 广西龙州

Abstract:

According to the new cultural geography, culture is not an intrinsic, unified whole, but composes of different. Although Longzhou’s French-decorated folk houses landscape is famous as ‘historic’, it is not a mere relic of the past but a landscape under continual reproduction. French-decorated folk houses adorned with sculptures and vibrant colors feature a variety of modern architectural styles with foreign and exotic imaginaries. The residential landscape plays an important role not just in a formal sense but also in terms of secular judgment of personal fortune where thrifty peasants become lavish spenders with the ability to discriminate, selecting high-quality decoration that reflect their economy strength. In addition, French-decorated folk houses also strengthen the personal identity and local identity of local peasants. The study is not only exemplified on the change of landscape research to the social and cultural significance in the field of new cultural geography, but also a response to the core research issue of the relationship between the locality, landscape and identity in the discipline of new cultural geography.

Key words: French-decorated folk house, symbolism, identity, Longzhou

中图分类号:

K901.6

万蕙, 唐雪琼. 中越边境乡村民居景观的符号象征与认同建构——广西龙州县边境乡村案例[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(4): 595-602.

Hui Wan, Xueqiong Tang. The Symbolism and the Identity Construction of French-decorated Folk Houses Landscape on the Sino-Vietnamese Borderland in Longzhou, Guangxi Province[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2017, 37(4): 595-602.

图/表 1

参考文献 25

[1]	向岚麟,吕斌.新文化地理学视角下的文化景观研究进展[J].人文地理,2010,25(6):7-13.
	[Xiang Lanlin,Lyu Bin.Review on Culutral Landscape Study in the perspective of New Cultural Geography.Human Geography,2010,25(6):7-13.]
[2]	周尚意. 英美文化研究与新文化地理学[J].地理学报,2004,59(SI):1621-66.
	[Zhou Shangyi.Anglo-American Cultural Studies and the New Cultural Geography.Acta Geographica Sinica,2004,59(SI):1621-66.]
[3]	汤茂林. 文化景观的内涵及其研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2000,19(1):70-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6301.2000.01.010
	[Tang Maolin.The Inventory and Progress of Cultural Landscape Study.Progress in Geography,2000,19(1):70-79.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6301.2000.01.010
[4]	翁时秀,彭华.政府与村民的行为对古村落及景观变迁的影响:基于本土社会学理论视角[J].地理科学,2011,31(3):372-377.
	[Weng Shixiu,Peng Hua.Impact of behaviors of governments and villagers on ancient villages protection and landscape Changing: A perspective of native sociological theory.Scientia Geographica Sinica,2011,31(3):372-377.]
[5]	麦克·克朗.文化地理学[M].杨淑华,译.南京:南京大学出版社,2005.
	[Mike Crang.Cultural Geography.Translated by Yang Shuhua.Nanjing: Nanjing University Press,2005.]
[6]	杜芳娟,陈晓亮,朱竑.民族文化重构实践中的身份与地方认同:仡佬族祭祖活动案例[J].地理科学,2011,31(12):1512-1517.
	[Du Fangjuan,Chen Xiaoliang,Zhu Hong.Ethnic Identity and Place Identity in the Practice of Ethnic Cultural Reconstruction:A Case Study of Official Ancestor Worship of Gelao Minority in Wuchuan County.Scientia Geographica Sinica,2011,31(12):1512-1517.]
[7]	斯图尔特·霍尔.表征:文化表征和意指实践[M].徐亮,等译.北京:商务印书馆,2013.
	[Stuart Hall.Representation Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices.Translated by Xu Liang et al.Beijing: The Commercial Press,2013.]
[8]	沙润. 中国传统民居建筑文化的自然观及其渊源[J].人文地理,1997,12(3):25-29.
	[Sha Run.Outlook On the Nature and Origins of the Culture of Traditional Residential Architecture in China.Human Geography,1997,12(3):25-29.]
[9]	Cresswell T.Place: A short introduction[M].Oxford: Blackwell,2004.
[10]	毕燕,易烁君,梁丽文.边境旅游需求特征分析研究:以广西龙州县为例[J].广西师范学院学报(自然科学版),2010,28(1):68-74. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-8743.2011.01.015
	[Bi Yan, Yi Shuojun,Liang Liwen.Analysis and Research on Demand Characteristics of Frontier Tourism.Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University: Natural Science Edition,2010,28(1): 68-74.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-8743.2011.01.015
[11]	石维有,韦福安.中法战争与龙州城近代化的开启[J].玉林师范学院学报,2009,30(1):89-92.
	[Shi Weiyou, Wei Fuan.The Sino-French War and the Modernization of Longzhou.Journal of Yulin Normal University,2009,30(1):89-92.]
[12]	韦福安. 龙州近代化进程中的特征略论[J].广西社会科学,2008,(10):34-37.
	[Wei Fuan.On the characteristics of the process of modernization in Longzhou. Guangxi Social Sciences,2008,(10):34-37.]
[13]	广西通志馆.广西通志(外经贸志)[M].南宁:广西人民出版社,1997.
	[Annals of Guangxi Museum. Annals of Guangxi.Nanning: Guangxi People’s Publishing House, 1997.]
[14]	李蕾蕾. 从新文化地理学重构人文地理学的研究框架[J].地理研究,2004,23(1):125-134. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2004.01.015
	[Li Leilei.Re-constructing the Research Frame of Human Geography from Perspectives of New Cultural Geography. Geographical Research,2004,23(1):125-134.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2004.01.015
[15]	让·波德里亚.消费社会[M].刘成富,等译.南京:南京大学出版社,2001.
	[Jean Baudrillard. Consuming Society.Translated by Liu Chengfu et al.Nanjing: Nanjing University Press,2001.]
[16]	杨新忠. 透过传统民居看现代民居之人文思想尴尬[J].美术大观,2013,(1):64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2953.2013.01.026
	[Yang Xinzhong.On the Humanistic Thought of Modern Residence through the Traditional Residence.Art Panorama,2013,(1):64.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2953.2013.01.026
[17]	姜彩芬. 面子、符号与消费[J].广西社会科学,2008,(5):72-75.
	[Jiang Caifen.Face, Symbol and Consumption Guangxi Social Sciences,2008,(5):72-75.]
[18]	黄光国.面子:中国人的权力游戏[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
	[Huang Guangguo.Face: Power Game of Chinese People.Beijing: China Renmin University Press,2004.]
[19]	居伊德波. 景观社会[M].王昭风,译.南京:南京大学出版社,2006.
	[Guy Debord.Society of the Spectacle.Translated by Wang Zhaofeng.Nanjing: Nanjing University Press,2006.]
[20]	Naveh Z.Interaction of landscape cultures[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,1995,32(1):43-54.
[21]	朱竑,刘博.地方感,地方依恋与地方认同等概念的辨析及研究启示[J].华南师范大学学(自然科学版),2011,(1):1-8.
	[Zhu Hong,Liu Bo.Concepts Analysis and Research Implication:Sense on Place, Place Attachment and Place Indentity.Journal of South China Normal University(Natural Science Edition),2011,(1):1-8.]
[22]	秦晖.思无涯,行有制[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2002.
	[Qin Hui.Thinking without boundaries, Action limited.Tianjin: Tianjin People’s Publishing House,2002.]
[23]	王亮. 制度建构与个体的身份认同问题:我国二元的户籍制度对失地农民身份认同的影响[J].前沿,2010,(8):7-9.
	[Wang Liang.System construction and individual identity: The influence of the household registration systemon the identity of landless peasants. Forward Position,2010,(8):7-9.]
[24]	阿尔弗雷德·阿德勒.理解人性[M].陈太胜,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,2007.
	[Alfred Adler.Understanding Human Nature.Translated by Chen Taisheng.Beijing: China International Culture Press Limited,2007.]
[25]	段义孚. 经验透视中的空间与地方[M].潘桂成,译.台北:“国立”编译馆,1998.
	[Yi-Fu Tuan.Space and Place. Translated by Pan Guicheng.Taipei: “National” Institute for Compilation and Translation,1998.]

中越边境乡村民居景观的符号象征与认同建构——广西龙州县边境乡村案例

The Symbolism and the Identity Construction of French-decorated Folk Houses Landscape on the Sino-Vietnamese Borderland in Longzhou, Guangxi Province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 1

参考文献 25

相关文章 2

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	罗秋菊, 冯敏妍, 蔡颖颖. 旅游发展背景下民居客栈的空间生产——以大理双廊为例[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(6): 927-934.
[2]	沙润. 中国传统民居建筑文化的自然地理背景[J]. 地理科学, 1998, 18(1): 58-64.