EN中文

地理科学 >

2009 , Vol. 29 >Issue 4: 545 - 549

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2009.04.545

论文

东北漫岗黑土区浅沟侵蚀发育特征

展开
  • 1. 济南大学城市发展学院, 山东 济南 250002;
    2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所黄土高源土壤与旱地 农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨陵 712100;
    3. 北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室, 北京 100875
胡 刚(1976- ),男,山东滨州人,博士,副教授,主要研究方向为土壤侵蚀、环境演变与区域规划。E-mail: hug2008@yahoo.com.cn

收稿日期: 2008-09-17

  修回日期: 2009-05-10

  网络出版日期: 2009-07-20

基金资助

本项目为国家自然科学基金重点项目(40235056)、中国博士后基金(20070410482)、教育部博士点基金(20030027015)、济南大学博士基金(B0620)、黄土高原土壤侵蚀与农业国家重点实验室基金项目(10501-237)、山东省重点学科基金项目资助。

收起

Growth Characteristics of Ephemeral Gully in Rolling Hills of Black Soils in Northeast China

Expand
  • 1. School of City Development, University of Jinan, Jinan, Shandong 250002;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Water and Soil Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministtry of water resources, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100;
    3. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875

Received date: 2008-09-17

  Revised date: 2009-05-10

  Online published: 2009-07-20

Fold

摘要

东北黑土区是中国重要商品粮基地之一,沟道恶性扩张,已成为导致该区土地退化主要原因之一。利用全球定位系统和传统方法测量浅沟形态参数,结合地理信息系统(GIS)平台计算流域尺度的沟蚀现状,分析东北黑土区浅沟侵蚀发育特征,并对比分析其与黄土高原浅沟侵蚀发生的地貌因子之间的异同。研究表明,研究区浅沟分布密度0.56~0.93 km/km2,年侵蚀模数达到118~199 m3/km2,浅沟破坏面积占流域面积比例达0.11%~0.19%,浅沟沟壑密度已经达到中度和强度侵蚀,处于快速发展时期;研究区浅沟的临界汇水面积大于黄土高原,分布的临界坡度小于黄土高原,这主要由黑土区坡长坡缓的特点决定。

关键词： 东北黑土区; 浅沟; 侵蚀特征

本文引用格式

胡刚, 伍永秋, 刘宝元, 郑秋红, 张永光, 魏欣 . 东北漫岗黑土区浅沟侵蚀发育特征[J]. 地理科学, 2009 , 29(4) : 545 -549 . DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2009.04.545

Abstract

With the deepen understanding of soil erosion at spatial scale, gully erosion has been attracted more interest than ever. The black soils in Northeast China is one of the important bases for food supplies, but now the soil erosion, especially the fast expansion of gully erosion, has been one of the most important reasons for soil degradation. This paper made use of Global Positioning System (GPS) to measure the shape characteristics of ephemeral gully(EG), the platform of Geographical Information System to calculate the status of EG erosion, and analysis the geomorphic factors to determine the occurrence of EG erosion. The results show that the distribution density of EG is 0.56-0.93 km/km2, its annual erosion modulus is between 118 m3/km2 and 199 m3/km2, and the proportion of the destroyed area by EG come up to 0.11%-0.19% of the watershed area. These indicated that gully density has reached middle and intensity degree erosion, being in rapid growth stage. It was also found that the threshold catchment area of EG in the study area is larger than that in the Loess Plateau, whereas the threshold slope smaller than that in the Loess Plateau. Meantime, the analyses indicated that the volume of ephemeral gully is determined mostly by its length that is mostly determined by the length of watershed. This means that mostly the length of the watershed determines the volume of ephemeral gully, which undoubtedly provides a referred thought for the construction of gully model.

Key words： black soil; ephemeral gully; erosion characteristics; Northeast China

参考文献

[1] 刘宝元,张科利.土壤可蚀性及其在侵蚀预报中的应用[J].自然资源学报,1999, 14(4):345~350.
[2] Poesen J, Nachtergaele J, Verstraeten G,et al.Gully erosion and environmental change: importance and research needs[J].CATENA,2003, 50(2-4):91-133.
[3] Krause A K,Franks S W,Kalma J D,et al.Multi-parameter fingerprinting of sediment deposition in a small gullied catchment in SE Australia[J].CATENA,2003, 53(4):327-348.
[4] Li Y,Poesen J,Yang J C,et al.Evaluating gully erosion using 137Cs and 210Pb/137Cs ratio in a reservoir catchment[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2003,69(1-2):107-115.
[5] 郑粉莉,武 敏,张玉斌,等.黄土陡坡裸露坡耕地浅沟发育过程研究[J].地理科学,2006, 26(4):438~442.
[6] Valentin C,Poesen J,Li Y.Gully erosion:Impacts,factors and control[J].CATENA,2005, 63(2-3):132-153.
[7] 胡 刚,伍永秋,刘宝元,等.东北漫岗黑土区切沟侵蚀发育特征[J].地理学报,2007, 62(11):1165~1173.
[8] 陈永宗.黄河中游黄土丘陵区的沟谷类型[J].地理科学,1984,4(4):321~327.
[9] 张科利,唐克丽.黄土高原坡面浅沟侵蚀特征值的研究[J].水土保持学报,1991,5(2):8~13.
[10] 朱显谟.黄土区土壤侵蚀的分类[J].土壤学报,1956,4(2):99~115.
[11] Soil Science Society of America. Glossary of Soil Science Terms. Soil Science Society of America. Madison, WI,2001:http://www.soils.org/sssagloss/.
[12] Poesen J. Gully typology and gully control measures in the European loess belt[C]// Wicherek S (Ed). Farm Land Erosion in Temperate Plains Environment and Hills. Elsevier, Amsterdam,1993: 221-239.
[13] 刘兴土,阎百兴.东北黑土区水土流失与粮食安全[J].中国水土保持,2009,(1):17~19.
[14] 张永光.东北漫岗黑土区小流域浅沟侵蚀初步研究.北京师范大学,2006.
[15] 沈玉昌,龚国元.河流地貌学概论[M].北京:科学出版社,1986.
[16] 唐克丽,张科利.黄土丘陵区退耕上限坡度的研究论证[J].科学通报,1998, 43(2):200~203.
[17] 张科利.陕北黄土丘陵沟壑区坡耕地浅沟侵蚀及其防治途径.中国科学院西北水土保持研究所,1988.
[18] 胡 刚,伍永秋,刘宝元,等.东北漫川漫岗黑土区浅沟和切沟发生的地貌临界模型探讨[J].地理科学,2006, 26(4):449~454.
[19] 姜永清,王占礼,胡光荣,等.瓦背状浅沟分布特征分析[J].水土保持研究,1999,6(2):181~184.
[20] Nachtergaele J, Poesen J, Steegen A,et al.The value of a physically based model versus an empirical approach in the prediction of ephemeral gully erosion for loess-derived soils[J]. Geomorphology,2001,40(3-4):237-252.
[21] Foster G,Lane L.Erosion by concentrated flow in farm fields[C].//Li R M, Lagasse P F (Eds) . In Proceedings of the D.B. Simons Symposium on Erosion and Sedimentation. Colorado State University, Fort Collins,1983:965-982.
[22] Rauws G. The initiation of rills on plane beds of non-cohesive sediments[J].Rill erosion. Catena, Suppl,1987,8:107-118.
[23] Rauws G,Covers G.Hydraulic and soil mechanical aspects of rill generation on agricultural soils[J]. J.Soil Sci,1988,39:111- l24.
[24] Leopold L B,Wolman M G,Miller T P.Fluvial processes in geomorphology[M].San Francisco: W.H.Freeman,1964:522.
[25] 张永光,伍永秋,刘鸿鹄,等.东北漫岗黑土区地形因子对浅沟侵蚀的影响分析[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(1):35~38.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉