论文

劳动力跨地区流动与地区差距

展开
  • 1. 浙江大学经济学院, 浙江 杭州 310027;
    2. 贵州财经学院金融学院, 贵州 贵阳 550004
严浩坤(1962-), 男, 江西新余人, 博士研究生, 副教授, 主要研究方向:金融与区域经济发展。E-mail:yhk1213@163.com

收稿日期: 2007-08-02

  修回日期: 2007-10-24

  网络出版日期: 2008-03-20

基金资助

贵州财经学院博士与在读博士基金项目资助。

Labor Interregional Mobility and Regional Disparity of China

Expand
  • 1. Economic College of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310027;
    2. Guizhou Finance and Economics Institute, Guiyang, Guizhou 550004

Received date: 2007-08-02

  Revised date: 2007-10-24

  Online published: 2008-03-20

摘要

中国区域间的劳动力流动对地区差距有着重要的影响。但是,劳动力流动对地区差距究竟是起了扩大作用,还是缩小作用,已有的研究并没能形成一致的结论。基于中国的转型背景,认为中国特有的户籍制度及其相应的配套政策构成了劳动力区际流动的制度约束,这种制度约束使不同类型的劳动力流动方式不同。进而分析了劳动力流动方式对地区差距的影响。研究结论表明:转型期中国区域之间劳动力流动,尽管流动方式不同,但都在一定程度上扩大了中国地区差距和城乡差距。

本文引用格式

严浩坤 . 劳动力跨地区流动与地区差距[J]. 地理科学, 2008 , 28(2) : 179 -184 . DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2008.02.179

Abstract

The labor interregional mobility in China has important effects on the interregional disparity of China. However, no common conclusion about the labor interregional mobility enlarging or shortening the interregional disparity is drawn from the present researches. Based on the background of institutional transformation of China, this paper suggests that the household register system and the supporting policies endemic to China constructed the system restraints on the labor interregional mobility. These characteristic systems, including the household resister system and the supporting policies, gradually became a kind of "permission system" for those labors who move from one region to another in China. There are two different modes of labor mobility restricted by the "permission system" of ingoing place during the period of institutional transformation of China. One is the mobility of labors qualified above the critical threshold of permission rules of ingoing place, and the other is under. Author calls the former one as the mode of labor migration mobility, and the latter the mode of labor wandering mobility. As the critical threshold of permission rules is mainly the requirement for labor's quality, the labors of high quality always use the mode of labor migration mobility while the labor of low quality can only use the mode of labor wandering mobility. This paper further analyzes the impact of mode of labor mobility on interregional disparity. This research result shows that high quality labors interregional mobility in the period of institutional transformation of China does enlarge the interregional disparity, which is in common with the conclusion of experience. The difference from previous research conclusion is that low quality labors interregional mobility in the period of institutional transformation of China can increase the average income level of comparatively undeveloped areas, and it also enlarge but not shorten the interregional disparity and the rural-urban disparity of China to some extent due to the characteristic system restraints in China.One significant attempt of this paper is to introduce the word "labor quality" into the analysis of the labor interregional mobility. It divides the labor mobility into high quality labor's interregional migration mobility and low quality labor's interregional wandering mobility on the base of the institutional transformation background of China, and further analyzes separately their effects on regional disparity. Therefore, it is probably much more close to the real situation of China, compared with those researches without considering the institutional transformation background of China and the quality differences of the labors who move interregionally. The significance of this paper also includes that author constructs a unified theoretically analytical framework aimed to analyze all kinds of labor mobility in China, which is different from most of the existing research documents.It is known that the rural-urban disparity and regional disparity of China are enlarging in recent years. There are many causes inducing this phenomenon. This paper explains the phenomenon from perspective of the labor interregional mobility, which is possible to help the governments make polices.

参考文献

[1] Barro, R. and X. Sala-i-Martin. Regional Growth and Migration: A Japan-United States Comparison[J]. Journal of the Japanese and International Economics 6, 1992:312~346.
[2] Barro, Robert J. and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. Economic Growth [M]. Magraw-Hill, 1995.
[3] 姚枝仲,周素芳. 劳动力流动与地区差距[J]. 世界经济,2003,(4):35~44.
[4] 樊纲. 既要扩大"分子" 也要缩小"分母"——关于在要素流动中缩小"人均收入"差距的思考[J].中国投资与建设,1995,(6):16~18.
[5] 刘强. 中国经济增长的收敛性分析[J]. 经济研究,2001,(6):70~77.
[6] 王德文,朱玮,叶晖. 1985-2000 年我国人口迁移对区域经济差异的均衡作用研究[J]. 人口与经济,2003,(6):1~9.
[7] 王小鲁,樊纲. 中国地区差距:20 年变化趋势和影响因素[M]. 北京:经济科学出版社,2004:1~108
[9].
[8] 赵伟(2005)等著. 中国区域经济开放:模式与趋势. 北京:经济科学出版社,2005:148~202.
[9] 杨云彦. 劳动力流动、人力资本转移与区域政策[J]. 人口研究,1999,(9):130~134.
[10] 蔡昉,王德文,都阳. 劳动力市场扭曲对区域差距的影响[J]. 中国社会科学,2001,(2):62~68.
[11] Cai, F., Wang, D., and Du, Y..Regional Disparity and Economic Growth in China: The Impact of Labor Market Distortions[J]. China Economic Reviews 13,2002:197-212.
[12] Samuelson, P. A..International Trade and the Equalization of Factor Prices[J]. Economic Journal 58, 1948: 163-184.
[13] Samuelson, P. A..International Factor Price Equalization Once Again[J]. Economic Journal 59, 1949: 181-197.
[14] Slaughter, Matthew J..Per Capita Income Convergence and the Role of International Trade. NBER Working Paper 5897,1999.
[15] 蔡昉,都阳. 中国地区经济增长的趋同与差异 [J]. 经济研究,2000,(10):30~37.
[16] 陈国阶. 我国东中西部发展差异原因分析[J]. 地理科学,1997, 17 (1): 1~7.
[17] 吴殿廷,宋金平,梁进社,张同升. 库兹涅茨比率的分解及其在我国地区差异分析中的应用[J]. 地理科学,2003,23(4):427~433.
[18] 鲁凤,徐建华. 基于二阶段嵌套锡尔系数分解方法的中国区域经济差异研究[J]. 地理科学,2005,25(4):401~407.
[19] 孟斌,王劲峰,张文忠,刘旭华. 基于空间分析方法的中国区域差异研究[J]. 地理科学,2005,25(4):393~400.
文章导航

/