论文

地级以上城市土地利用结构特征及影响因素差异分析

展开
  • 1. 西南大学资源环境学院, 重庆 400715;
    2. 河南城建学院测绘与城市空间信息系, 河南 平顶山 467001;
    3. 西南大学地理科学学院, 重庆 400715

收稿日期: 2010-08-07

  修回日期: 2011-03-16

  网络出版日期: 2011-05-20

基金资助

国家"十一五"科技支撑计划(2006BAJ14B04-02)资助。

Characteristics and Driving Factors of Urban Land Use Structure of Cities at Provincial Level and Above

Expand
  • 1. College of Resource and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China;
    2. Department of Survey and Urban Spatial Information, Henan University of Urban Construction, Pingdingshan, Henan 467001, China;
    3. School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

Received date: 2010-08-07

  Revised date: 2011-03-16

  Online published: 2011-05-20

摘要

根据2007年地级以上城市的土地和社会经济数据,采用比较法、模型法和主成分法,分析其土地利用结构特征及影响因素。结果发现:①不同规模城市的居住用地、公共设施用地、工业用地、道路广场用地和绿地的比例差距明显,而仓储用地、对外交通用地、市政公用设施用地和特殊用地的比例差异较小;②随城市规模增大,居住用地、公共设施用地、工业用地比、道路广场用地的比例符合《城市用地分类与规划建设用地标准》(GBJ137-90)(以下简称《标准》)、《城市公共设施规划规范》(GB50442-2008)(以下简称《规范》)的程度呈上升趋势;③居住用地比例超出《标准》上限城市较多,且城市规模越小,超标比例越高;④中等规模以上城市的公共设施用地比例偏低,而中小城市公共设施用地比例偏高;⑤特大城市中工业用地比例超标城市数量较多,而中小城市低于《标准》下限的较多;⑥随城市规模增大,道路广场用地比例低于《标准》下限的城市所占比例降低;⑦地级以上城市中至少有1/3城市绿地比例不及《标准》下限;⑧城市规模越大,土地利用的多样化程度越高,土地利用类型越齐全,且土地利用结构多样性指数高的城市呈集聚状,呈现"群"状特点,土地利用结构均衡度递增,但优势度趋减;⑨经济因素、产业结构、交通设施水平和城市人口是影响土地利用结构的主要因素,但对不同规模城市的影响次序不同。

本文引用格式

鲁春阳, 文枫, 杨庆媛, 张鹏飞 . 地级以上城市土地利用结构特征及影响因素差异分析[J]. 地理科学, 2011 , 31(5) : 600 -607 . DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2011.05.600

Abstract

According to the land and socio-economic data of cities at provincial level and above in 2007, using the methods of comparison model and principal component analysis, this paper analyses the characteristics and driving factors of urban land use structure. The results showed: 1) the difference of the proportion of residential land, commercial land and public facilities space, industrial land, road and green space is large, but that of the proportion of warehouse, transportation, municipal utilities is small; 2) with the increasing of city size, the proportion of residential land, commercial land and public facilities space, industrial land and road rise consistenting with the Chinese standard and specification; 3) the cities of residential proportion does not conform to standard mainly beyond the standard cap cities, and the smaller city size, the more serious exceeding the Classification of Land-use and Standards of Urban Construction Land (Standard for short); 4) the cities with low commercial land and public facilities space are with medium sizes above, but it is high in medium and small cities; 5) the proportion of industrial land mainly exceeds the "Standard" in megalopolis, while the cities of industrial land proportion lower than the "Standard" are mainly with medium and small sizes; 6) as city size increases, cities with lower proportion of road and green space than the "Standard" decreases; 7) the proportion of green space is less than "Standard "limit at least 1/3 cities at prefecture level and above in China; 8) the larger the city size, the higher the diversification and the more complete of land use; 9) the cities with higher land use diversity index take on the form of agglomeration; 10) as city size increases, the bigger the equilibrium degree, the lower the dominance degree; 11) the main driving factors of urban land use structure are economic factors, industrial structure, transportion facilities level and urban population, however, the impact order and impact degree on cities withdifferent sizes are different.

参考文献

[1] 鲍丽萍,王景冈.中国大陆城市建设用地扩展动因浅析[J].中国土地科学,2009,23(8):68~72.
[2] George Galster.Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept[J].Housing Policy Debate, 2001,12: 681-717.
[3] Sutton P C.A scale-adjusted measure of "Urban sprawl" using nighttime satellite imagery[J].Remote Sensing of Environment,2003,8: 353-369.
[4] Chris Davis,Tim Schaub. A trans boundary study of urban sprawl in the Pacific Coastregion of North America: The benefits of multiple measurement methods[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation,2005,7(4): 268-283.
[5] 袁丽丽.城市化进程中城市用地结构演变及其驱动机制分析[J].地理与地理信息科学,2005,21(3):51~55.
[6] 宋吉涛,宋吉强,宋敦江.城市土地利用结构相对效率的判别性分析[J].中国土地科学,2006,20(6):9~15.
[7] 郑新奇,孙元军,付梅臣,等.中国城镇建设用地结构合理性分析方法研究[J].中国土地科学,2008,22(5):4~10.
[8] 孙元军,郑新奇,常伟倩.基于Weka的城市建设用地结构特征挖掘分析[J].计算机工程与应用,2008,44(27):231~235.
[9] 边学芳,吴 群,刘玮娜.城市化与中国城市土地利用结构的相关分析[J].资源科学,2005,27(3):73~78.
[10] 章 波,濮励杰,黄贤金,等.城市区域土地利用变化及驱动机制研究——以长江三角洲地区为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2005,14(1):28~33.
[11] 张新长,张文江.城市土地利用时空结构演变的驱动力研究[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),2005,44(1):117~120.
[12] 鲁春阳,杨庆媛,文 枫,等.城市用地结构与产业结构关联的实证研究—以重庆市为例[J].城市发展研究,2010,17(1):102~107.
[13] 张 洁.东京城市土地利用结构分析及其对中国大城市的启示[J].经济地理,2004,24(6):812~815.
[14] 姚士谋,陈 爽,吴建楠,等.中国大城市用地空间扩展若干规律的探索—以苏州市为例[J].地理科学,2009,29(1):15~21.
[15] 曾忠平,卢新海.武汉城市用地结构演变模式研究[J].中国土地科学,2009,23(3):44~48.
[16] 住房和城乡建设部综合财务司.中国城市建设统计年鉴(2007年)[J].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2008.
[17] 国家统计局城市社会经济调查总队.中国城市统计年鉴[J].北京:中国统计出版社,2008
[18] 国家统计局.中国统计年鉴[J].北京:中国统计出版社,2008.
[19] 曾 钢,焦萧黎.信息熵与分型理论在城市土地利用结构合理性分析中应用[J].科协论坛,2007,4(下):7~8.
[20] 卢纹岱.SPSS for Windows 统计分析[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2004.
文章导航

/