论文

中国入境旅游规模空间分布变化及因素分析

展开
  • 1. 长沙学院旅游管理系, 湖南 长沙 410003;
    2. 中山大学地理科学与规划学院, 广东 广州 510275

收稿日期: 2010-08-15

  修回日期: 2011-03-24

  网络出版日期: 2011-05-20

基金资助

长沙学院人才引进项目(SF0910)资助。

Evolution and Its Factors of Spatial Distribution of Inbound Tourism Size in China

Expand
  • 1. Tourism Management Department, Changsha University, Changsha, Hunan 410003, China;
    2. School of Geographical Science and Planning, SUN Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510275, China

Received date: 2010-08-15

  Revised date: 2011-03-24

  Online published: 2011-05-20

摘要

基于地市入境旅游人数和相关经济统计数据,运用基尼系数和主成份回归等分析方法,探讨了1999~2008年中国入境旅游规模空间分布和内部结构变化的规律及相关因素。结果表明,全国、三大地带和大部分省份的空间分布都属集聚型,但其集中性基本呈现下降趋势,且这种变化趋势体现在内部结构的变化上也有明显地一致性。进一步分析表明,总体上,不同规模等级和空间层次的空间分布不平衡程度越低,趋向分散的态势就越明显。这种空间分布变化与旅游发展条件的不断改善存在正的相关性。在各地区旅游业得到全面发展、旅游需求发生结构性变化的转型时期,经济发展、产业结构优化、对外经济开放度、市场发展和基础设施条件等因素对缩小地区入境旅游规模空间差异的作用日益凸现,旅游发展机制向多元化因素驱动转变。

本文引用格式

陈刚强, 许学强 . 中国入境旅游规模空间分布变化及因素分析[J]. 地理科学, 2011 , 31(5) : 613 -619 . DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2011.05.613

Abstract

Based on the prefecture-level data of inbound tourism population and relative economic statistics, this paper investigates the evolution and its factors of the spatial distribution disparity and its interior structure of inbound tourism size in China using Gini coefficient and principal component regression model in 1999-2008. The conclusions are drawn as follows: 1) On the whole, the spatial disparity remains large but becomes smaller and smaller in China and the Three Zones in the past 10 years, and the evolutions of interior structure for the different sizes are consistent with its whole trend. On the other hand, as the sizes increase, the imbalance of spatial distribution is smaller, while the dispersive trend is more significant. 2) The change between the imbalance of spatial distribution and the dispersive trend remains samilar in different spatial levels. As a whole, the spatial disparity is largest in the Western Zone, and is smallest in the Middle Zone. While the dispersive trend is most significant in the Middle Zone, and is most inapparent in the West Zone. On the same time, the analysis on the provincial disparity and its evolution testify the above conclusions. Then the distribution type is presented based on the provincial disparity and its evolution. But the situation becomes slightly complicated. The spatial disparity is largest in the Eastern Zone when the size is above 10 000 person-time, and the dispersive trend is most significant in the Western Zone when the size is 200 000 person-time. 3) The positive relation is existed between the spatial distribution change of inbound tourist size and tourism development condition improvement. In the transition period of the holistic development of local tourism industry and the structural change of tourist demand, the influences of the factors, such as economic development, industry structure optimizing, the degree of economic open, market development and infrastructure construction and so on, are more and more significant for reducing the spatial disparity of local inbound tourism size, indicating that the mechanism of tourism development has been drived by multi-factors.

参考文献

[1] Vasiliadis C H A,Kobotis A. Spatial analysis—An application of nearest-neighbour analysis to tourism locations in Macedonia[J]. Tourism Management,1999,20: 141-148.
[2] Dredge Dianne. Destination place planning and design[J]. Annals of Tourism Research,1999,26(4):772-791.
[3] 王 瑛,王 铮.旅游业区位分析——以云南为例[J]. 地理学报,2000,55(3):346~353.
[4] Pearce D. Towards a geography of tourism[J]. Annals of Tourism Research,1979,6(3):245-272.
[5] Murphy P E,Andressen B. Tourism development on Vancouver Island:An assessment of the core-periphery model[J]. The Professional Geographer,1988,40(1):32.
[6] 吴必虎,黄琢玮,马小萌.中国城市周边乡村旅游地空间结构[J].地理科学,2004,24(6):757~763.
[7] Weaver D. Peripheries of the periphery:Tourism in Tobogo and Barbuda[J]. Annals of Tourism Research,1998,25(2):292-313.
[8] 史春云,张 捷,尤海梅,等. 四川省旅游区域核心-边缘空间格局演变[J]. 地理学报,2007,62(6):631~639.
[9] 朱 竑,吴旗韬. 中国省际及主要旅游城市旅游规模[J]. 地理学报,2005,60(6):919~927.
[10] 杨国良,张 捷,艾南山,等. 旅游流齐夫结构及空间差异化特征——以四川省为例[J]. 地理学报,2006,61(12):1281~1289.
[11] 陆 林,余凤龙. 中国旅游经济差异的空间特征分析[J]. 经济地理,2005,25(3):406~410.
[12] 陈秀琼,黄福才. 中国入境旅游的区域差异特征分析[J]. 地理学报,2006,61(12):1271~1280.
[13] 保继刚,甘萌雨. 改革开放以来中国城市旅游目的地地位变化及因素分析[J]. 地理科学,2004,24(3):365~370.
[14] 许学强,周一星,宁越敏. 城市地理学[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2001.
[15] Ramanathan R. Introductory Econometrics with Applications[M]. London:Thomson Learning Press,2002.
[16] Chatterjee S,Hadi A S,Price B.Regression Analysis by Example[M]. Beijing:China Statistics Press,2003.
[17] Johnson R A,Wichern D W. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis[M]. Beijing:China Statistics Press,2003.
[18] 国家统计局国民经济综合统计司. 中国区域经济统计年鉴(2000~2009). 北京:中国统计出版社.
[19] 陈刚强,李 郇,许学强. 中国城市人口的空间集聚特征与规律分析[J]. 地理学报,2008,63(10):1045~1054.
[20] Khadaroo John,Seetanah B. Transport infrastructure and tourism development[J]. Annals of Tourism Research,2007,34(4):1021-1032.
[21] Zhang H Q,Chong K,Ap John. An analysis of tourism policy development in modern China[J].Tourism Management,1999,20:471-485.
[22] Goodall B,Asworth G. Marketing in the Tourism Industry[M]. London:Routledge,1990.
文章导航

/