选择城市化进程不断加快的陕西关中地区为研究区,依据"压力-状态-响应"模型建立了格网化区域生态安全评价体系,在格网GIS技术的支持下,对评价体系中各指标进行1 km×1 km尺度下的网格化表达,运用基于栅格数据的空间叠加方法实现生态安全模型评价,得到格网化关中地区1990年、2000年和2007年生态安全指数空间数据,在此基础上结合关中地区实际,定性与定量相结合地确定了生态安全评价等级划分阈值。对计算结果进行分析,总结出1990~2007年间关中地区生态安全特点有三,一是总体呈现出生态安全状况逐渐转好态势,但仍处于不安全状态;二是区域内生态安全变化存在明显差异;三是不同年份生态安全影响因素有所差别。研究结果表明,格网GIS用于研究生态安全能更好地反映其内部差异,优于传统研究方法。
For recent years, there were still some deficiencies in the ecological security research. For example, the spatial scales were not quite reasonably selected and the thresholds of ecological security ranks were determined with the lack of practical significance. And all these maybe decrease the credibility of research results. Therefore, for the current lacks of ecological security research, choosing the Guanzhong region with accelerating the urbanization process as study area which is located in Shaanxi Province, this paper built up the regional ecological security evaluation system on the basis of "pressure-status-response" model and gridding methods. In support of the gridding GIS technology, this paper gave each index in the evaluation system the spatial expression of 1 km?1 km grid scale. Subsequently, using the spatial overlaying technology based on grid data, this paper achieved the modeling evaluation of ecological security and acquired the gridding spatial data of every ecological security indexes for Guanzhong region in the year of 1990, 2000 and 2007. With the software of GIS, the paper carried out the spatial overlay analysis based on raster data and acquired the gridding data of ecological security of Guanzhong region. Combined with the reality of Guanzhong region, and referred to the current situation and circumstances of national forest parks and nature reserves, the paper tried to determine the threshold used to classify the ranks of ecological security by means of qualitative and quantitative methods. The results show that there are three features of ecological security of Guanzhong region. First , the ecological security of Guanzhong region is overall becoming better and better, but it is still unsafe; Second, the ecological security changes have the significant differences within the region. Third, there are different factors of affecting ecological security in different years.
[1] Shi X Q, Zhao J Z, Ouyang Z Y. Assessment of eco-security in the Knowledge Grid[J]. The Journal of Systems and Software,2006,(79):246-252.
[2] Huang Q, Wang R H, Ren Z Y, et al. Regional ecological security assessment based on long periods of ecological footprint analysis [J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,2006,(1):1-18.
[3] 任志远,黄 青,李 晶.陕西省生态安全及空间差异定量分析[J].地理学报,2005,60(4):597~606
[4] 左 伟,王 桥,王文杰,等.区域生态安全综合评价模型分析[J].地理科学,2005,25(2):209~214.
[5] 贾艳红.基于格网GIS的生态安全评价研究——以甘肃牧区草原生态安全评价为例[D].兰州:西北师范大学,2005
[6] 王 耕,吴 伟.基于GIS格网技术的流域生态安全可视化评价[J].大连理工大学学报,2006,46(5):667~672.
[7] 任志远,黄 青.陕西关中地区生态安全定量评价与动态分析[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(4):169~172.
[8] 杨 勇,任志远.西部资源型城市生态安全评价与对策[J].生态学杂志,2006,25(9):1109~1113.
[9] 田萍萍.基于生态足迹分析的陕西关中地区生态安全与生态补偿研究.西安:西北大学,2006.
[10] 陕西师范大学地理系.陕西省地理志[M],西安:陕西人民出版社, 1984.
[11] 左 伟, 王 桥, 王文杰,等. 区域生态安全评价指标与标准研究[J]. 地理学与国土研究, 2002, 18(1):67~71.
[12] 高 娟.浅水湖泊湿地生态安全评价研究[D].北京:首都师范大学,2006.
[13] 陈述彭,陈秋晓,周成虎.网格地图与网格计算[J].测绘科学,2002,27(4):1~6.
[14] 刘 宇,李成名.空间信息格网研究进展[J].测绘科学,2007,32(4):187~189.
[15] 赵 荣,董 春.统计信息与空间信息按地理格网集成的方法研究[J].测绘科学,2007,32(4):69~71.
[16] 左 伟,张桂兰,万必文,等.中尺度生态评价研究中格网空间尺度的选择与确定[J].测绘学报, 2003,32 (3):267~271.
[17] 田建中.观音山国家森林公园成为"国际生态安全旅游示范基地" [J].国土绿化,2006,(10):45~45.
