整合景观生态学的核心概念是"整体人类生态系统",是全球生态各个阶层协同进化的最高水平,由生物圈景观和石油燃料驱动的技术圈景观组成,整合景观生态学致力于将两者从结构和功能上整合为一个和谐、可持续的生态圈。文章在讨论整合景观生态学产生的历史背景和发展意义的基础上,初步论述了整合景观生态学的理论基础,包括整合景观生态学的系统论基础、控制论和可持续发展理论基础、自组织理论基础、协同进化理论基础、等级理论基础、相互作用系统理论基础和隐含次序理论基础,目的是使整合景观生态(经济和自然景观)和其他跨学科一起,共同促进当今自然与人类社会的"共生"过程。
The central concept of holistic landscape ecology is the "Total Human Ecosystem". It is in the highest level of co-evolutionary complexity in the global ecological hierarchy with solar energy powered biosphere and fossil energy powered techno-sphere landscapes. By utilizing new insights in self-organization,Holistic landscape ecology could contribute to their structural and functional integration into a coherent sustainable ecosphere and there by to the establishment of a sustainable balance between attractive and productive biosphere landscapes and healthy and livable techno-sphere landscapes for this and future generation. On basis of the historical background of holistic landscape ecology formation and its development trend, the paper discussed the basic theories of holistic landscape ecology, such as general systemitic theory, cybernetics and sustainable theory, self-organization theory, co-evolution theory, general systems and hierarchy theory, interaction systems theory and implicate order theory ect. General systematics theory consider that,a system is always more than sum of its elements due to some relations, and it include some new emergent properties that each elements do not have. Cybernetics and sustainable theory consider that, feedback control can adjust culture in the whole nature and human, and can control and establish a stable mechanism, and through structure and function of biosphere and techno-sphere holistic, forming a sustainable biosphere. Self-organization theory consider that systems on a relatively high organization level that can renew, repair and replicate themselves as networks of interrelated component-producing processes in which the network is created and recreated in a flow of matter and energy are called autopioetic systems. The synergetic systems include landscape wholeness and hierarchy principle, landscape antagonism principle, landscape instability or multistability principle, landscape selection principle. Landscapes should be treated as a special case of mixed natural and cultural medium-number interaction systems, in this system, through the interaction of natural elements and human constructions, adaptation of humans and their natural environment in cultural Total Human Ecosystem landscapes created closely co-evolutionary process. Holistic landscape (economy and natural landscape) ecology together with other environmental sciences could promote the urgently needed symbiosis between nature and human society.
[1] Laszlo E. The Choice: Evolution or Extinction[M]. New York:Athinking Person's Guide to Global Issues. C.P. Putnam and Sons,1994.
[2] IALE Mission. IALE Mission Statement[J]. IALE Bulletin,1998,16:1.
[3] Kuhn T S. The Structure of the Scientific Revolution[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, IL,1970.
[4] Zonneveld I S. Land Ecolog[M]. Amsterdam:The Netherlands: SPB Academic Publishing, 1995.
[5] Li B L. Why is the holistic approach becoming so importantin landscape ecology? [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2000,50: 27-41.
[6] Naveh Z,Lieberman A. Landscape Ecology: Theory and Applications[M]. New York: 2nd Edition. Springer,1994.
[7] Naveh Z. Culture and landscape conservation - a landscape ecological perspective.Gopal B, Pathak P S, Saxena K G. (Eds.).Ecology Today: An Anthology of Contemporary Ecological Research. New Delhi: International Scientific Publications,1998. 19-48.
[8] Naveh Z. What is holistic landscape ecology? a conceptual introduction[J]. Landscape Urban Planning,2000,50:7-26.
[9] Bertalanffy L von. General Systems Theory. Foundations,Development and Applications[M]. New York: Braziller,1968.
[10] Weiss P A. The living system: determinism stratified. Koestler A,Smithies J R. (Eds.). Beyond Reductionism: New Perspectives in the Life Sciences. London: Hutchinson,1969. 2-55.
[11] Li B L,Müller F. Application of the pansystem entropy concept to hierarchical ecosystem analysis[J]. Advance System Science Application,1995,1: 13-18.
[12] Grossmann W D,Meiss M,Fraenzle S. Art,design and theory of regional revitalization within the information society[J]. Gaia ,1997,6: 105-119.
[13] Grossmann W D. Realizing sustainable development with information society [J]. Landscape Urban Planning,1999,50: 181-195.
[14] Brown L R,Flavin H F,French H. State of the World: A Worldwatch Institute Report on Progress Toward a Sustainable Society[M]. New York: Norton and Company,1999.
[15] Laszlo E. The Systems View of the World: A Holistic Vision for Our Time[M]. Cresskill: Hampton Press,N J,1996. 103.
[16] Naveh Z,Lieberman A. Landscape Ecology: Theory and Applications[M]. New York: 1st Edition. Springer,1984.
[17] Bak P,Tang C,Wiesenfeld K. Self-organized criticality[J]. Physics Review 1988A, 38: 364-374.
[18] Werner B T. Complexity in natural landform patterns[J]. Science,1999,284: 102-104.
[19] O'Neill R V,Johnson A R,King A W. A hierarchical framework for the analysis of scale[J]. Landscape Ecology,1989,3:193- 205.
[20] Mauersberger P. Entropy control of complex ecological processes. Patten B C,Jorgensen S E(Eds.).Complex Ecology: The Part-Whole Relation in Ecosystems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs,N J,1995. 130-165.
[21] Laszlo E. Introduction to Systems Philosophy: Toward a New Paradigm of Contemporary Thought[M]. New York : Harper Torchbook ,1972.
[22] Egler F E. The Way of Science: A Philosophy for the Layman[M]. New York : Hafner,1970.
[23] Pimentel D. Conserving biological diversity in agricultural systems[J]. BioScience,1992,42: 354-362.
[24] Vitousek P M,Mooney H A,Lubchenco J. Human domination of Earth's systems[J]. Science,1997,277: 494-499.
[25] Naveh Z. Transdisciplinary landscape-ecology education and the future of post-industrial landscapes. Farina A,Naveh Z (Eds.). Symposium on Educating Landscape Ecologists for the 21st Century: The Role of Landscape Ecology in Scientific and Professional Training. Bollet. Del Museo di Storia Naturale della Lunigiana,Supplemento,Aulla,1995. 9,13-26.
[26] Naveh Z. Interactions of landscapes and cultures[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,1995,32: 43-54.
[27] Peat F D. Infinite Potential:The Life and Times of David Bohm[M]. Helix Books. Addison-Wesley,Reading Massachusetts. 1997.
[28] Bohm D. Wholeness and the Implicate Order[M]. London: Routledge and Kegan,1980.
[29] Bohm D,Peat F D. Science,Order,and Creativity: A Dramatic Look at the Roots of Science and Life[M]. New York: Bantam Books,1987.
[30] Caldwell L K. Landscape,law and public policy: conditions for an ecological perspective[J]. Landscape Ecology,1990,5: 3-8.
[31] Forman R T T,Godron M. Landscape Ecology[M]. New York : Wiley,1986.
[32] Mandelbrot B H. The Fractal Geometry of Nature[M]. New York: Freeman,1982.
[33] Burrough P A. Fractal dimensions of landscapes and other environmental data[J]. Nature,1981,294:243.
[34] Loehle C. Homerange: a fractal approach[J]. Landscape Ecology,1990,5: 39-52.
[35] Milne B T. The utility of fractal geometry in landscape design[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,1991, 21:81-90.
[36] Allen T F H,Hoekstra T W. Toward a Unified Ecology[M]. New York: Columbia University Press,1992. 348.
[37] Farina A. Principles and Methods in Landscape Ecology[M]. London: Chapman and Hall,1998.
[38] 喻 红,曾 辉,江子瀛.快速城市化地区景观组分在地形梯度上的分布特征研究[J].地理科学,2001, 21(1): 64~69.
[39] 陈 浮,葛小平,陈 刚等.城市边缘区景观变化与人为影响的空间分异研究[J].地理科学,2001,21(3):210~216.
[40] 白永平.甘肃省武威市绿洲生态环境综合评价及其整治方略[J].地理科学,2001,21(3):251~258.
[41] 李团胜,肖笃宁.沈阳市城市景观结构分析[J].地理科学,2002,22(6):717~723.
[42] 陈国阶.论地理学面临的挑战与发展[J].地理科学,2003,23(2):129~135.
[43] 张秋菊,傅伯杰,陈利顶.关于景观格局演变研究的几个问题[J].地理科学,2003,23(2):264~270.
[44] Naveh Z. From biodiversity to ecodiversity: a landscape ecological approach to conservation and restoration [J]. Restoration Ecology,1994,4: 180-189.
