中国城市人居环境质量特征与时空差异分析
作者简介: 李雪铭(1964-) ,男,江苏常熟人,教授,博士,主要从事城市人居环境、城市化与人工地貌环境变化研究与教学工作。E-mail: lixueming999@163.com
收稿日期: 2011-07-19
要求修回日期: 2012-04-20
网络出版日期: 2012-05-20
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目(41171137)、教育部人文社会科学基金项目(08ja790060)资助
Characteristics and Spatial-temporal Differences of Urban Human Settlement Environment in China
Received date: 2011-07-19
Request revised date: 2012-04-20
Online published: 2012-05-20
Copyright
城市人居环境已成为推动城市化发展进程,衡量城市化发展水平的重要因素。以社会经济环境、居住环境、基础设施和公共服务环境、生态环境4个一级指标,28个二级指标构建了城市人居环境质量综合评价指标体系,运用熵值法对中国286个地级以上城市在2000年、2003年、2006年和2009年4个时间断面的人居环境质量特征和时空差异变化进行了分析。结果表明:中国城市人居环境质量整体在逐步提高,城市之间人居环境质量得分差值缩小,各城市排名基本保持在一定范围;城市人居环境质量级别差异明显;城市人居环境质量时空差异显著,呈现出与经济发展水平相似的从东部到中、西部依次递减的地带性空间分布特征以及南高北低的分布状况,且各地区城市级别分布不均衡;人居环境质量水平较高的城市呈“团”状分布,与国家“十二五”规划纲要中城市化战略格局基本吻合;城市人居环境质量与城市规模无对应关系。
李雪铭 , 晋培育 . 中国城市人居环境质量特征与时空差异分析[J]. 地理科学, 2012 , 32(5) : 521 -529 . DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2012.05.521
This article establishes an evaluation system of urban human settlement environment with four first-level indexes as standard, including socio-economic environment, living condition, infrastructure and public service environment, and natural ecological environment, and 28 second-level indexes. With the method of entropy, the urban human settlement environment quality of 286 cities at prefecture level and above in 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009 is analyzed. The results show the urban settlement environment quality of Chinese cities is gradually improving in recent 10 years. Between citie, score gap is gradually narrowing, and the city rank changes within a certain range basically, but in the most of cities, urban human settlement environment construction is at a low development level. The spatial difference of urban human settlement environment quality is significant, and the distribution of cities at all city levels in each region is unbalance. With the urban human settlement environment quality decreasing from the eastern coastal regions to central and western regions, and from the south to the north. It shows that the eastern region has the advantages both in the number of cities belonged to the first three levels and in the proportion in different regions. Cities with the level of three, four and five dominate the central region, and those with the level of five and six dominate the western region. The economy is not deciding factor, but is the main factor resluting in the differences of urban human settlement environment, and is the prerequisite of improving urban human settlement environment. Therefore, to promote the economic development and to improve the urban economic strength is still the main development direction for cities. The cities with higher urban human settlement environment quality are distributed in the form of agglomeration, which fits well the urbanization strategy in China. There is correlation between urbanization level and urban human settlement environment quality: the level of urbanization is higher, the urban human settlement environment quality is higher. There is no correlation between urban human settlement environment quality and city size, sometimes, the quality of many small cities is higher than that of big cities. This means that city development should be coordinated with local conditions, and the process should be human-oriented, serve for human production and life, and not pursue the external scale. The process of urbanization is unbalanced, and many aspects need to be improved. Cities with higher grades have not been developing comprehensively, and ecological environment, infrastructure, public service, urban and rural gap do not develop sufficiently. This means many aspects of the process have not got enough attention, needing the elimination of the short boards to achieve the comprehensive improvement of urban human settlement environment quality.
Table 1 Index system of evaluation on urban human settlement environment quality表1 城市人居环境质量综合评价指标体系 |
一级指标 | 二级指标 |
---|---|
社会经济环境 | X1:人均GDP(元);X2:人均固定资产投资总额(元);X3:人均城乡居民储蓄存款额(元);X4:人均社会消费品零售额(元);X5:城镇居民人均可支配收入(元) |
居住环境 | X6:市区人口密度(人/km2);X7:人均居住面积(m2);X8:人均家庭生活用水量(t);X9:人均家庭生活用电量(千瓦小时);X10:人均房地产开发投资额(元) |
基础设施和公共服务环境 | X11:人均城市铺装道路面积(m2);X12:燃气普及率(%);X13:每万人拥有公共汽电车(辆);X14:每万人拥有出租车数量(辆);X15:每百人拥有固定电话数(部);X16:每百人拥有移动电话数(部);X17:城市互联网普及率(%);X18:每万人医院、卫生院床位数(张);X19:每万人医生数(人);X20:每万人医院数(个);X21:每百人公共图书馆藏书(册) |
生态环境 | X22:城市生活污水处理率(%);X23:工业固体废物综合利用率(%);X24:工业废水排放达标率(%);X25:生活垃圾无害化处理率(%);X26:人均园林绿地面积(m2);X27:建成区绿化覆盖率(%);X28:空气质量二级以上天数达标率(%) |
Table 2 The first and last 10 cities according to comprehensive score of the urban human settlement environment表2 中国城市人居环境质量综合得分前10名和后10名城市 |
排 名 | 2000年 | 2003年 | 2006年 | 2009年 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
城市 | 得分 | 城市 | 得分 | 城市 | 得分 | 城市 | 得分 | ||
前十名 | 1 | 深圳 | 1.000 | 深圳 | 1.000 | 深圳 | 1.000 | 深圳 | 1.000 |
2 | 佛山 | 0.462 | 东莞 | 0.443 | 东莞 | 0.621 | 东莞 | 0.805 | |
3 | 珠海 | 0.427 | 广州 | 0.411 | 上海 | 0.478 | 鄂尔多斯 | 0.667 | |
4 | 广州 | 0.385 | 上海 | 0.391 | 广州 | 0.477 | 上海 | 0.535 | |
5 | 东莞 | 0.376 | 北京 | 0.386 | 长沙 | 0.462 | 广州 | 0.532 | |
6 | 北京 | 0.353 | 克拉玛依 | 0.385 | 北京 | 0.438 | 沧州 | 0.525 | |
7 | 海口 | 0.351 | 珠海 | 0.383 | 厦门 | 0.422 | 厦门 | 0.506 | |
8 | 福州 | 0.343 | 福州 | 0.368 | 福州 | 0.420 | 长沙 | 0.496 | |
9 | 上海 | 0.340 | 无锡 | 0.359 | 苏州 | 0.416 | 北京 | 0.493 | |
10 | 昆明 | 0.340 | 长沙 | 0.357 | 无锡 | 0.416 | 珠海 | 0.485 | |
后十名 | 277 | 商洛 | 0.065 | 巴彦淖尔 | 0.071 | 忻州 | 0.123 | 昭通 | 0.139 |
278 | 安顺 | 0.064 | 保山 | 0.071 | 内江 | 0.121 | 安顺 | 0.139 | |
279 | 内江 | 0.063 | 绥化 | 0.067 | 商洛 | 0.119 | 贺州 | 0.137 | |
280 | 渭南 | 0.055 | 商洛 | 0.066 | 运城 | 0.117 | 绥化 | 0.134 | |
281 | 定西 | 0.054 | 内江 | 0.065 | 来宾 | 0.108 | 崇左 | 0.131 | |
282 | 昭通 | 0.052 | 渭南 | 0.065 | 巴中 | 0.100 | 商洛 | 0.130 | |
283 | 绥化 | 0.052 | 定西 | 0.051 | 绥化 | 0.098 | 贵港 | 0.122 | |
284 | 眉山 | 0.050 | 昭通 | 0.049 | 定西 | 0.097 | 巴中 | 0.115 | |
285 | 巴中 | 0.017 | 巴中 | 0.043 | 昭通 | 0.090 | 定西 | 0.077 | |
286 | 陇南 | 0.000 | 陇南 | 0.000 | 陇南 | 0.000 | 陇南 | 0.000 |
Table 3 Statistics of urban human settlement environment in China表3 中国城市人居环境质量得分分级统计 |
年份 | 一级城市 | 二级城市 | 三级城市 | 四级城市 | 五级城市 | 六级城市 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
个数 | 平均得分 | 个数 | 平均得分 | 个数 | 平均得分 | 个数 | 平均得分 | 个数 | 平均得分 | 个数 | 平均得分 | |
2000年 | 32 | 0.346 | 37 | 0.247 | 66 | 0.204 | 55 | 0.163 | 62 | 0.122 | 34 | 0.074 |
2003年 | 40 | 0.344 | 30 | 0.256 | 61 | 0.215 | 59 | 0.175 | 60 | 0.133 | 36 | 0.081 |
2006年 | 43 | 0.403 | 32 | 0.314 | 50 | 0.274 | 66 | 0.231 | 57 | 0.184 | 38 | 0.135 |
2009年 | 48 | 0.464 | 24 | 0.363 | 55 | 0.310 | 56 | 0.258 | 60 | 0.210 | 43 | 0.156 |
Fig.1 Distribution of cities at all urban settlement environment quality levels图1 各级别城市人居环境质量城市空间分布 |
Fig.2 Relation between urban settlement environment quality and city size图2 城市人居环境质量与城市规模关系 |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
国家统计局.中国城市统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2001,2004,2007,2010.
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
第十届全国人民代表大会常务委员会.中华人民共和国城乡规划法[M/OL].2007-10-28.
|
/
〈 | 〉 |