论文

地下水环境风险的模糊多指标分析方法

展开
  • 1. 合肥工业大学资源与环境工程学院, 安徽 合肥 230009;
    2. 合肥工业大学土木与水利工程学院, 安徽 合肥 230009
李如忠(1970- ),男,安徽怀远人,博士,博士后,教授,主要从事水环境保护的教学科研工作。E-mail:Lrz1970@163.com

收稿日期: 2009-04-12

  修回日期: 2009-08-05

  网络出版日期: 2010-03-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(50579009)、安徽省科技攻关计划重点项目(07010302165)、安徽省优秀青年科技基金项目(08040106830)资助。

Multi-variable Fuzzy Analysis Method for Groundwater Environmental Risk

Expand
  • 1. School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230009;
    2. School of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230009

Received date: 2009-04-12

  Revised date: 2009-08-05

  Online published: 2010-03-20

摘要

从影响地下水脆弱性的地质与水文地质条件、地貌特征、污染物性质、土地利用状况以及地下水社会价值功能等因素出发,筛选出22项评价指标,初步构建具有多层次结构特点的地下水环境风险评价指标体系。在将地下水环境风险定义为风险等级与风险重要性乘积的基础上,对风险等级与风险重要性等级的分级标准进行探讨,建立风险评价的模糊多属性决策分析模型。作为案例,将上述指标体系和评价模型应用于皖北3个城市浅层地下水环境风险的分析,取得较好效果,为地下水环境风险评价研究提供了新思路、新方法。

本文引用格式

李如忠, 汪明武, 金菊良 . 地下水环境风险的模糊多指标分析方法[J]. 地理科学, 2010 , 30(2) : 229 -235 . DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2010.02.229

Abstract

Groundwater environmental assessment is a useful tool for environmental planning and decision-making. Up to now, many studies have been carried out and several index models have been developed for assessing groundwater vulnerability worldwide. Because of the complicated characteristics of groundwater environmental system, however, there still has no a satisfactory methodology for the comprehensive assessment of groundwater environmental risk. In this paper, an index system, with multi-level structure, was first established for groundwater environmental risk assessment, by using twenty-two qualitative and quantitative indictors chosen from such fields as geology, hydrological geology, landform, pollution qualities, types of land use and social values of groundwater, etc. Meanwhile, the groundwater environmental risk was defined as a multiplication between grade of risk and importance of risk, and the classification standards for grade of risk and importance of risk were also primarily established, individually. On the bases, a fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making model was proposed for the assessment of groundwater environmental risk. As a case, above index system and model were utilized to evaluate the groundwater environmental risk of three cities, located in the north of Anhui Province. Study result showed that the index system and multi-attribute decision-making model established above were reasonable and effective for groundwater environmental risk assessment.

参考文献

[1] 范 琦,王贵玲,蔺文静,等.地下水脆弱性评价方法的探讨及实例[J].水利学报,2007,38(5):601~605.
[2] 张丽君.地下水脆弱性和风险性评价研究进展综述[J].水文地质工程地质,2006,(6):113~119.
[3] Martin L Collin,Abraham J Melloul.Combined land-use and environmental factors for sustainable groundwater management[J].Urban Water,2001,3(3):229-237.
[4] Secunda S,Collin M L.Groundwater vulnerability assessment using a composite model combining DRASTIC with extensive agricultural land use in Isreal’s Sharon region[J].Journal of Environmental Management,1998,54(1):39-57.
[5] 雷 静,张思聪.唐山市平原区地下水脆弱性评价研究[J].环境科学学报,2003,23(1):94~99.
[6] 付素蓉,王焰新,蔡鹤生,等.城市地下水污染敏感性分析[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2000,25(5):48~486.
[7] 杨 庆,栾茂田.地下水易污性评价方法——DRASTRIC指标体系[J].水文地质工程地质,1999(2):4~9.
[8] 钟佐燊.地下水防污性能评价方法探讨[J].地学前缘,2005,12(特刊):3~13.
[9] Lee Huey-ming.Applying fuzzy set theory to evaluate the rate of aggregative risk in software development [J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1996,79(3):323-336.
[10] Sadiq R,Husain T.A fuzzy-based methodology for an aggregative environmental risk assessment:a case study of drilling waste[J].Environmental Modelling and Software,2005,20(1):33-46.
[11] 胡蓓蓓,姜衍祥,周 俊,等.天津市滨海地区地面沉降灾害风险评估与区划[J].地理科学,2008,28(5):693~697.
[12] 李如忠,钱家忠.地下水降深的未确知风险分析[J].地理科学,2005,25(5):631~635.
[13] 冯 平,李绍飞,李建柱.基于突变理论的地下水环境风险评价[J].自然灾害学报,2008,17(2):13~18.
[14] 龚士良,杨世伦.地面沉降对上海黄浦江防汛工程的影响分析[J].地理科学,2008,28(4):543~547.
[15] 朱永恒,濮励杰,赵春雨.景观生态质量评价研究——以吴江市为例[J].地理科学,2007,27(2):182~187.
[16] 吴永娇,马海州,董锁成,等.城市化进程中生态环境响应模型研究[J].地理科学,2009,29(1):64~70.
[17] 张 从.环境评价教程[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002:108~110.
文章导航

/